The Amazing Spider-Man 2 How should the Goblin look???

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think if it works for Mission Impossible, it can for a Spider-Man Movie. Though I would prefer the transformation.

Perhaps. But this was always a very cartoony part of the MI movies anyways. What would be Osborn's rationale for inventing a latex mask with exagerrated goblin features that adhered to his own facial muscles giving him the ability to emote? Because he's "crazy"?

For this go around, I actually think I'd prefer the transformation route where he has the same general appearance as the "classic" green goblin/glider/weapons, etc...
 
I think it can even work even if you make him completely sane. I thought they pulled it off well in Spectacular Spider-Man. With Norman successfully testing the Goblin formula on himself and his growing ambitions to have more control and power. So he invented the Green Goblin persona, to do things he could never do has Norman Osborn. And you can say he made the Green Goblin so ridiculous, so that no one in their right mind would ever suspect him to be the Goblin.
 
I think it can even work even if you make him completely sane. I thought they pulled it off well in Spectacular Spider-Man. With Norman successfully testing the Goblin formula on himself and his growing ambitions to have more control and power. So he invented the Green Goblin persona, to do things he could never do has Norman Osborn. And you can say he made the Green Goblin so ridiculous, so that no one in their right mind would ever suspect him to be the Goblin.

In other words, the original comic books. lol.
 
An even better video, starting at around 08:00

EDIT: Video contained cursings, lots of them. Dude's crazy

EDIT 2: That guy was ****ing scary, not because of the mask :S
 
Last edited:
yeah if that happens, i will just pretend this movie entirely doesn't exist. they got Carnage I think in the same line, so it's not really tied to the movies.

I mean if Webb did even do an Ultimate Goblin, he wouldn't be having fire all over and big horns on his head. even without all that, the character is physically silly.

I've never got Ultimate Goblin, I don't see how it adds anything at all to the character. what's the payoff supposed to be with that?

Without that he's Hulk.

Whats the payoff with the 616 costume?
 
I like both masks. The eyes are the only things that give it away otherwise it'd be great for Chameleon as well!
 
You could have him physically mutate, but not make him look like the Hulk. Maybe he tests some kind of serum on himself, and it slowly starts to make him look more like an actual Goblin, closer to the comics costume? That could be really creepy and unnerving the see, especially if it causes him extreme physical and mental pain.
 
Design is leaked. It's the Ultimate version. Also, Carnage and Beetle will be in the film. Thanks, Hasbro!
 
You being sarcastic? It's already been proven they were comic figures


Then NVM. I guess it's like the Wolverine figures that weren't related to the film at all. That's probably for the best since Carnage appearing before Venom would be kind of weird. I still just want to know what Green Goblin and Rhino look like.
 
For this go around, I actually think I'd prefer the transformation route where he has the same general appearance as the "classic" green goblin/glider/weapons, etc...

I'm still quite partial to this idea. We could get a "616-ish" Goblin without the need to explain how a latex mask moves so fluidly and how Norman can change in and out of his Goblin gear so quickly.

Besides, I like the idea of a 616 and Ultimate hybrid.

Anybody remember the part in the Ultimate comics where Norman has Peter come to his penthouse and reveals that he knows who Peter is and intimidates him by transforming into Goblin right in front of him? That moment made Norman intimidating in his own right. It was intense and I would LOVE to see it adapted for this film series.
 
Why would a mask need to be explained? You show him putting it on, or taking it off. Problem solved in about 1.3 seconds.
 
Why would a mask need to be explained? You show him putting it on, or taking it off. Problem solved in about 1.3 seconds.

Except latex masks don't move naturally with the wearer. Any high quality latex work (like Amalgamated Dynamics' work) sometimes takes hours to put on so it will work right. So unless we want the kind of mask you find in a costume store, it's going to be questionable how he is able to get a mask that works that way. Of course, they could just as easily have something about all the Goblin's gear, including the mask, being some sort of high tech something-or-other that molds to his face. But I find the transformation to be much more straightforward.

It seems Vid and SpideyFan866 have already covered this in the last page or so. And they're absolutely correct.
 
Well firstly, people don't have spider powers or turn into giant lizardmen either but audiences don't have a problem accepting that so they certainly aren't going to balk at a mask, and second, yes they can move quite realistically as demonstrated in the already posted video where a kid just puts one on without spending hours doing so.

If you're outright against a mask for whatever reason that's fine but I keep seeing this "not realistic" argument and it doesn't hold water.
 
I'm still quite partial to this idea. We could get a "616-ish" Goblin without the need to explain how a latex mask moves so fluidly and how Norman can change in and out of his Goblin gear so quickly.

Besides, I like the idea of a 616 and Ultimate hybrid.

Anybody remember the part in the Ultimate comics where Norman has Peter come to his penthouse and reveals that he knows who Peter is and intimidates him by transforming into Goblin right in front of him? That moment made Norman intimidating in his own right. It was intense and I would LOVE to see it adapted for this film series.
i'm glad you brought that scene up, that's actually the one thing that I think really worked about Ultimate Goblin. that was a great scene and I was wondering earlier what the payoff was with that direction, physically, and that's true. that scene kinda says it perfectly.

but I think it's far better to have the Goblin be an outwardly normal guy. that is psychologically twisted into a different form.

and for masks and all that. I'd say that some small amount of costume shop mask might work, but that the Goblin shouldn't be portrayed by a mask or a physical transformation, but by the actor's performance.
with some subtle help from fx, of course. but the real Goblin is that, to me.

how do you find an actor like that tho? but I've seen people go from one face to a whole different person once a certain head takes over. and it's scary. it feels like you're tripping balls off and really their bones seem to be different once they do this. it's not bones but it's all your face muscles.

and that's really what the Ultimate Goblin transformation is trying to convey to us in an exaggerated and fittingly dramatic way. and it works in it's way for the comics.

but in a movie, the transformation would have to be way way less silly and less about the body becoming huge and more about the actor's performance. so much so that I think it basically comes down to what I'm saying anyways. even if they go with a physical transformation, why would you want that to overshadow the person playing the role? and any straight adaptation of Ultimate Goblin is going to do that.

plus another thing about 616 Goblin that is just perfect, is that he's wearing a costume. psychologically, this obivously says a lot about him and it is something that I feel is fundamental in him. he's the dirty side. and you could say Ultimate Goblin is a dirty side too, but it's a dirty side of brute power, an over projection of Norman's straight side. where the mask moves it to a dirty side of shadow and repression.

I guess thinking of it like this, it really has more to do with whether you want the Goblin somewhat self aware or not. cuz each version can't be used in the other's headspace. why would a self aware Goblin wear a mask, and an unaware Ultimate Goblin is really just more like the Hulk, Mr Hyde or something.

and actually looked at this way, I think that Webb's universe is only gonna make sense with a relatively self aware Goblin and that probably means we are gonna be seeing a physical transformation to some degree.

it makes a lot more sense to me when i look at it like that.
 
Well firstly, people don't have spider powers or turn into giant lizardmen either but audiences don't have a problem accepting that so they certainly aren't going to balk at a mask, and second, yes they can move quite realistically as demonstrated in the already posted video where a kid just puts one on without spending hours doing so.

If you're outright against a mask for whatever reason that's fine but I keep seeing this "not realistic" argument and it doesn't hold water.

yeah reality isn't the word to ever use about this kind of stuff.
what it has to be is true to the character, and true to how that character is gonna fit into this whole thing they've set up.

but realistic is always the wrong way to frame things. i agree
 
Yes, a teenager bitten by a radioactive Spider develops superpowers. A scientist turns into a ten-foot tall man-Lizard, and a nerdy electrical engineer falls into a vat of eels and gains god-like electrical powers, but a mask is too unbelievable, riiiiggghht.
 
Having a 616/UCS mashup would be great.

Keep the Glider
Have the Fire powers maybe
Keep the transformation, but not hulk size
Keep his intelligence when transformed

Something like this would be awesome...

2868912-the_amazing_spider_man_2_fan_poster_by_imperium_hero_d56x5gw.jpg
 
Last edited:
Why would a mask need to be explained? You show him putting it on, or taking it off. Problem solved in about 1.3 seconds.

Well firstly, people don't have spider powers or turn into giant lizardmen either but audiences don't have a problem accepting that so they certainly aren't going to balk at a mask, and second, yes they can move quite realistically as demonstrated in the already posted video where a kid just puts one on without spending hours doing so.

If you're outright against a mask for whatever reason that's fine but I keep seeing this "not realistic" argument and it doesn't hold water.

Preach it! This "it's unrealistic" talk and mentality is stupid and extremely unimaginative. I'm very sure some creative guys could come up with something to make the mask work perfectly in a movie.
 
Reminds me of the people that said Nolan's Joker wouldn't wear purple because "its an unrealistic colour"
 
Well firstly, people don't have spider powers or turn into giant lizardmen either but audiences don't have a problem accepting that so they certainly aren't going to balk at a mask, and second, yes they can move quite realistically as demonstrated in the already posted video where a kid just puts one on without spending hours doing so.

If you're outright against a mask for whatever reason that's fine but I keep seeing this "not realistic" argument and it doesn't hold water.

Here's the thing, Spider powers and lizard transformations have to be explained as well. It's not about realism. It's about making something impossible, or improbably, believable. While that mask is impressive, it still only expressive with the mouth. The rest of the face is unexpressive. So transformation is still more fitting imo.

Not once did I say it was "not realistic." I'm firmly against the "grounded and realistic" fad that is crippling the imaginative spirit in so much of the film industry right now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"