antsman41
CONCUBINE
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2006
- Messages
- 15,337
- Reaction score
- 10,421
- Points
- 103
What issue is that!?
Graham Nolan era (best artist ever), probably between 96-99...
What issue is that!?
But see, here's the thing. Bruce Wayne doesn't come across with as many detective skills as Mac Taylor, Horatio Caine or Gil Grissom. I put them in that order because Gil Grissom was more of a lab nerd and wasn't a formally qualified detective, and Horatio Caine is more of an over-the-top supercop. Mac Taylor is the most down-to-earth of the three.
I did mention CSI in my first post when I was comparing them.
I wasn't suggesting Batman be an old school detective with a magnifying glass though. That's why I mentioned Detective Goren (Vincent D'Onofrio) from Law and Order: Criminal Intent. He is a modern detective, but brilliant, able to think on his feet, very observant etc. He would ideally be the template for Bruce Wayne's abilities, as he comes from a very troubled background and can be very unorthodox with his methods.
I also mentioned the RDJ Sherlock Holmes franchise as that is more like Batman with the physicality.
The only reason I mentioned Murder She Wrote was because Jessica Fletcher was an amateur detective who wasn't formally qualified as such, but stuck her nose into police business because she just couldn't help her curiosity. The modern version of her is Richard Castle (Nathan Fillion), but even he has a lot of help and support from the police and their resources.
I could've also mentioned Cal Lightman (Tim Roth, "Lie to Me") but he is more of a specialist who has studied his craft on micro expressions for years. There's also Patrick Jane (Simon Baker, "The Mentalist"), or any of the NCIS team - particularly Leroy Gibbs (Mark Harmon). All of these are modern "detectives".
My point before is that Bruce Wayne should be at least have the same detective abilities as these characters I've listed.
I think given the breath and weight of both movies, Batman showed sufficient detective skills with the time allotted. Remember, in BB they had to show his whole growth as a character and how he came to be, while simultaneously setting up the villains, plot & secondary characters.
TDK was even worse, with a much more frenetic pace, but oddly, I think he showed even more intellect. Sure, Fox gives him the tech, but he took it further by developing the sonar on a citywide scale by himself. He did the forensics with the bullet basically by himself. He quickly deciphered the Joker's antics with switching the hostages, and showed some quick thinking in order to deal with that situation. He gave Gordon the marked bills to track the mob money.
I don't think there's ever going to be enough time to show Batman in detective mode to the extent most of you guys want, not in a live action movie. However I think he's still shown himself as being quite sharp
In Nolan's Batman, Bruce's technology does all the detective work for him. I think what alot of fans want is a Batman who proves he's the "world's greatest detective" because he figures out things and unravels mysteries with his mind and not always with the help of expensive tech.
Mental prowess is what would decides if someone is the greatest detective, not expensive forensic equipment.
In Nolan's Batman, Bruce's technology does all the detective work for him. I think what alot of fans want is a Batman who proves he's the "world's greatest detective" because he figures out things and unravels mysteries with his mind and not always with the help of expensive tech.
Mental prowess is what would decides if someone is the greatest detective, not expensive forensic equipment.
I recall back when Aronofsky was "attached" to the project that the idea for the films was much smaller, more character oriented, more 'of the street'. While Nolan has made good films, one can argue they are Bond-esque summer fare and TDKR looks to be more of the same. No thinking man's Batman here, just fists and explosions. I suppose that's the nature of these sorts of things, look at what they did to Sherlock Holmes. Again, a decent enough film, but... meh, maybe one day someone will make CSI: Gotham.I don't think there's ever going to be enough time to show Batman in detective mode to the extent most of you guys want, not in a live action movie. However I think he's still shown himself as being quite sharp
My favorite Bruce moment is BEGINS is when he researching allies and enemies in his study room and all of the scene hanging out and spying on people. Also, he totally was "detecting" the drugs by scooping out that apartment...
Nolan's Batman does in fact do things like interrogate people, investigate leads, and examine evidence in both Batman Begins & The Dark Knight. Things like identifying prints are far more efficient for a computer with a database to do than a person. Plus he did come up with ideas like the marked bills, et cetera. He's a smart crime-fighter of the 21st century. He's shown plenty of mental prowess in the Nolan films.
Screw Kane that is what Bill Finger wanted and wrote. Bob Kane was the most over appreciated man in the biz. All he came up with was the name.
I recall back when Aronofsky was "attached" to the project that the idea for the films was much smaller, more character oriented, more 'of the street'. While Nolan has made good films, one can argue they are Bond-esque summer fare and TDKR looks to be more of the same. No thinking man's Batman here, just fists and explosions. I suppose that's the nature of these sorts of things, look at what they did to Sherlock Holmes. Again, a decent enough film, but... meh, maybe one day someone will make CSI: Gotham.
The Sonar system Bruce concocted in TDK was a damn fine accomplishment on his part.
I can only assume that in TDKR Bruce will only get more clever and sly with his intellect.
Do you know the issue though?Graham Nolan era (best artist ever), probably between 96-99...
But his interrogation doesn't seem quite as effective as, say, someone like Det Goren from Criminal Intent. I would've loved a scene between Batman and the Joker (or any other criminal) in the same vein as you'd get with Goren when he's facing off against the criminals in the end and playing all kinds of psychological mind games.
Also, we didn't see Batman observing inconsistencies or profiling criminals. He doesn't have to do all the donkey work of processing evidence and DNA, but he should be the one figuring out how it all points to someone and the one breaking a case.
Yeah, not sure if that works with the Joker.
Also, don't see what case Batman would of had to break in the first two films. The enemies make themselves apparent from the word go.
And even if he is like Holmes, he doesn't need to be like the traditional version. Robert Downey Jr portrayed Holmes almost like a version of Batman who was also skilled in fighting etc. That's how Nolan's Dark Knight should really be.