• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

The Dark Knight Rises Hugo Strange

Legends of the Dark Knight #15: Prey, Part 5

What a shame. After me talking about how the previous instlament set the stage for a killer finale, what we ended up getting couldn't help but feel a little disappointing.

The biggest problem with the issue is likely the decision to take out the strongest aspect of the story - Hugo Strange - in the early stages, and have the weakest aspect of the story - Night-Scourge - emerge as the climactic Big Bad for the bulk of this concluding issue. But until his premature departure, Hugo Strange again makes for a marvelously vile villain, both in his treatment of the Mayor's daughter (he says she "has some bruising" - just a beating, or rape? The way he's prowling on the bed on top of her before the cutaway alludes to the latter) and in his personal, knowing jibes towards Batman. Of course, as I said in my last review, everyone knew in truth he was no match for Batman aside from Batman himself, and Batman's realisation of this meant that Hugo Strange no longer held any power over him, hence him being promptly cut down to size.

I liked the starting sequence too, with Batman on the road to renewed self discovery. It was hampered by the captions being hard-to-read in places (long have I hated that gimmicky "illegible handwriting caption" trend) but the general message was a strong one. Also note the contrast in how Batman assumes the mantle in a primal, almost animalistic fashion - the bats surrounding him, in a scene reminiscent of Batman Begins - whereas Hugo Strange is framed as just a guy in a silly suit. The difference is highlighted in Batman being framed in numerous "flattering" shots - low angle looking up, or with him bathed in shadows - while Hugo Strange is put in various distinctly UNflattering shots - kneeling on the bed to make his outfit look like kinky bedroom wear, running down the stairs handcuffed, or lying flat on his face having tripped over, cape draped over his head, his underpants-over-tights arse exposed to the wind. All emphasizing how much of a poseur Hugo Strange is, and replacing Batman is about more than putting on a costume and beating people up. An idea reinforced by Batman's later dominance of Night-Scourge.

In the end, everything is wrapped up neatly in a bow, all the loose ends I never thought they'd be able to address in a single issue addressed in one form or another. Prey wasn't an all-time classic, but it was a very enjoyable read, and Hugo Strange made for a great villain. I'm definitely keen to give the follow-up - Terror - a go.
 
Last edited:
I'd like to read them too but I haven't read the series yet so I don't want to get any spoilers.
 
Well, if Hugo Strange winds up being the villain, and Catwoman turns out to be the hinted-at female villain... Then The Dark Knight will have featured references to both of The Dark Knight Rises' villains.

Maybe Nolan knew it all along.
 
Well, if Hugo Strange winds up being the villain, and Catwoman turns out to be the hinted-at female villain... Then The Dark Knight will have featured references to both of The Dark Knight Rises' villains.

Maybe Nolan knew it all along.

Wait...did I miss something?

I know the "cats" line, but where was the Strange hint? :huh:
 
pope_face_palm.jpg


double-facepalm1.jpg
 
Apparently that wasn't enough

TripleFacePalm.jpeg
 
I see what's going on here. The unfunny guy is trying to make someone else (who wasn't trying to be funny, by the way) look unfunny.

Or is it that you just find predictable trolling hilarious?
 
I see what's going on here. The unfunny guy is trying to make someone else (who wasn't trying to be funny, by the way) look unfunny.

Or is it that you just find predictable trolling hilarious?

You clearly just don't get it, dude. I'm not even attempting to be funny, it's a declaration of the sad fact that some of you think Catwoman is really being referenced in TDK. Until(or unless) she is officially cast in DKR, I will always post a facepalm pic whenever someone says that what Fox says is a reference to Catwoman. And thanks for telling me that you weren't trying to be funny, because now I know you were serious about the Strange reference as well.

:facepalm:
 
You clearly just don't get it, dude. I'm not even attempting to be funny, it's a declaration of the sad fact that some of you think Catwoman is really being referenced in TDK. Until(or unless) she is officially cast in DKR, I will always post a facepalm pic whenever someone says that what Fox says is a reference to Catwoman. And thanks for telling me that you weren't trying to be funny, because now I know you were serious about the Strange reference as well.

:facepalm:

Look up the word "speculation".

Until then, have fun getting your rocks off on trolling other people who simply think something might have possibly occurred in a movie.

I'm pretty sure none of my posts said, "Lucius said Catwoman will be there" or "Joker announced the Hugo Strange cast listing". So, instead of making a terrible attempt at humor, you just thought you'd belittle people on a forum? And get all pissy and high-and-mighty because someone speculated something?

No wonder everyone on the rest of these forums hates the Batboards. Is your Blood Elf Paladin's gear better than mine too?
 
"...simply makes you stranger?"

Does that mean the Joker becomes Hugo Strange? :wow:

Obviously, why else would be be referencing Hugo Strange? Then he will taste venom and become Bane!:wow:
 
Until then, have fun getting your rocks off on trolling other people who simply think something might have possibly occurred in a movie.
It's not trolling for someone to have a disagreement with you. Maybe the facepalms weren't exactly warranted, but I still think that it's overreacting to call that trolling. You do realize that SHH even has facepalm emoticons, right?
No wonder everyone on the rest of these forums hates the Batboards. Is your Blood Elf Paladin's gear better than mine too?
But it's nice that you decided to pretty much insult all of the regulars here because of your dispute with one person, immediately after accusing said person of trolling... I mean, that's not the pot calling the kettle black or anything.
 
I don't see why "Should do fine against cats" can't be a reference to Catwoman. It can certainly be seen as such.

Incidentally, why didn't Joel Schumacher use Crazy Quilt?
 
I seriously doubt that line was meant as a reference to Strange. It completely pertained to Joker, unlike the "cats" line which was a throw-away joke that could have been a Catwoman nod.
 
It's not trolling for someone to have a disagreement with you. Maybe the facepalms weren't exactly warranted, but I still think that it's overreacting to call that trolling. You do realize that SHH even has facepalm emoticons, right?
But it's nice that you decided to pretty much insult all of the regulars here because of your dispute with one person, immediately after accusing said person of trolling... I mean, that's not the pot calling the kettle black or anything.

I was a regular here for quite a while, over a year or so ago. I stopped posting because it got to be annoying that I couldn't really find a single thread where everyone didn't try to flame the other, troll, /facepalm, etc. It's been well-known since the announcement of The Dark Knight that this part of SHH has been a hot-spot for that kind of issue.

There was no issue. I made a harmless statement, and because of it ALP felt the need to flex his e-peen and declare me a tool. Instead of just saying, "I disagree", or something of the sort. Not a half hour ago, I made the same statement to my brother (someone who's actually really quick witted and funny in person, rather than using the internet to take his time and hide behind his keyboard). You know what he said? "Oh yeah, that is pretty weird". Replies like that would be nice every once in a while, just like the two before me:

I don't see why "Should do fine against cats" can't be a reference to Catwoman. It can certainly be seen as such.

Incidentally, why didn't Joel Schumacher use Crazy Quilt?

I seriously doubt that line was meant as a reference to Strange. It completely pertained to Joker, unlike the "cats" line which was a throw-away joke that could have been a Catwoman nod.

That's fine that he disagreed. I'm completely okay with that. He didn't come in and begin /facepalming and trying to insult others. I made a statement. Just a simple, harmless statement. Not meant to flame, not meant to troll, not meant to stir up some conspiracy. This happened regularly when I used to post here often. There was an incredibly small percentage of posters here (regwec, Rachel_Dawes, Crook, etc.) with whom decent conversations could be held. Other than that, it was nitpicking at every single little thing someone disagreed with and providing 500 links as to why they're wrong, trying to be the first to /facepalm someone and then /facepalming them again when someone calls them out on it (like someone will probably quote this same post and do), and complete belligerence. So, no, it's not the pot calling the kettle black. It's me thinking it's a damn shame that I tried to give the users on these forums another chance but had to give up on that after my FIRST post.
 
Look up the word "speculation".

That's exactly what it is, just people having fun speculating. I kind of guessed that it was thrown in there just for the fans, NOT to say she'll be in the next one but as a joke and nothing more.

No wonder everyone on the rest of these forums hates the Batboards. Is your Blood Elf Paladin's gear better than mine too?

:lmao:
 
Last edited:
Look up the word "speculation".

Until then, have fun getting your rocks off on trolling other people who simply think something might have possibly occurred in a movie.

I'm pretty sure none of my posts said, "Lucius said Catwoman will be there" or "Joker announced the Hugo Strange cast listing". So, instead of making a terrible attempt at humor, you just thought you'd belittle people on a forum? And get all pissy and high-and-mighty because someone speculated something?

No wonder everyone on the rest of these forums hates the Batboards. Is your Blood Elf Paladin's gear better than mine too?

I was a regular here for quite a while, over a year or so ago. I stopped posting because it got to be annoying that I couldn't really find a single thread where everyone didn't try to flame the other, troll, /facepalm, etc. It's been well-known since the announcement of The Dark Knight that this part of SHH has been a hot-spot for that kind of issue.

There was no issue. I made a harmless statement, and because of it ALP felt the need to flex his e-peen and declare me a tool. Instead of just saying, "I disagree", or something of the sort. Not a half hour ago, I made the same statement to my brother (someone who's actually really quick witted and funny in person, rather than using the internet to take his time and hide behind his keyboard). You know what he said? "Oh yeah, that is pretty weird". Replies like that would be nice every once in a while, just like the two before me:


That's fine that he disagreed. I'm completely okay with that. He didn't come in and begin /facepalming and trying to insult others. I made a statement. Just a simple, harmless statement. Not meant to flame, not meant to troll, not meant to stir up some conspiracy. This happened regularly when I used to post here often. There was an incredibly small percentage of posters here (regwec, Rachel_Dawes, Crook, etc.) with whom decent conversations could be held. Other than that, it was nitpicking at every single little thing someone disagreed with and providing 500 links as to why they're wrong, trying to be the first to /facepalm someone and then /facepalming them again when someone calls them out on it (like someone will probably quote this same post and do), and complete belligerence. So, no, it's not the pot calling the kettle black. It's me thinking it's a damn shame that I tried to give the users on these forums another chance but had to give up on that after my FIRST post.

Really... just really?

You said you made "harmless statement" so by that same regard I posted a harmless photo. Yet it has apparently sent you on a massive multi-post rant. This is just a message board. But the fact that you're now on a tirade leaves me only one option...

:facepalm:


I'm glad some people can find the humor in life.:cwink:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"