TheSmoothKnight
Sidekick
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 4,091
- Reaction score
- 8,896
- Points
- 103
I don't know. When asked about Pattinson possibly joining the DCU he kinda gave off an "I'd rather not" vibe, while trying to stay polite and professional.Truth be told I'm having a hard time reading Matt here. Can't tell if he's just giving a PC, non-committal answer, or if there is genuine heat to these rumors.
As if DC will ever let that happenI need a Catwoman show
How do we think a Matt Reeves Mr. Freeze might look like?
If they decide to have Pattinson be the DCU Batman, I'd rather have them scrap the "Brave and the Bold" idea for now, and have his story progress organically by introducing Dick as his first Robin, etc .But Pattinson is too young for the DCU Batman.
How do we think a Matt Reeves Mr. Freeze might look like?
 
	 
	 
	To me this would make the most sense. Actually use Dick Grayson instead and build up front there.How do we think a Matt Reeves Mr. Freeze might look like?
If they decide to have Pattinson be the DCU Batman, I'd rather have them scrap the "Brave and the Bold" idea for now, and have his story progress organically by introducing Dick as his first Robin, etc .
Who cares? Let people speculate. Gives us stuff to talk about during dry spells for news. It really doesn't harm anyone.I love Matt and James but I really need both of them to just says specifically that Battison either will or won’t be in the DCU. Cause this kinda stuff is just gonna cause more speculation and stuff
That's interesting; because I find it very easy to believe the Clayface movie will not be attached to (any) Batman; exactly because he's a D-lister. Also from the little info about it, it seems like it's being approached as a horror movie first, DC property second (... or third). Somewhat similar the the Joker films.I just have a tough time believing they are making a clayface movie without attaching it somehow to batman,
This alone gets me so excited. It could make for some really terrifying stuff.-Cryonics researcher.
-Suit protects him from deep cold instead of keeping him cold. Disfigured from long exposure to deep cold.
-Liquid nitrogen gun, more for self defense.
-I really like Gotham's take on Freeze, where his victims are people he experiments on in order to find a cure and save Nora. But the traditional revenge angle where Nora is already frozen works just as well for me.
While cryonics is squarely a pseudoscience, it is very much a real thing and there are people out there that have actually frozen their bodies. If reimagined through this real-world application, Freeze could be genuinely unnerving.



The can keep it vague.That's interesting; because I find it very easy to believe the Clayface movie will not be attached to (any) Batman; exactly because he's a D-lister. Also from the little info about it, it seems like it's being approached as a horror movie first, DC property second (... or third). Somewhat similar the the Joker films.
-Cryonics researcher.
-Suit protects him from deep cold instead of keeping him cold. Disfigured from long exposure to deep cold.
-Liquid nitrogen gun, more for self defense.
-I really like Gotham's take on Freeze, where his victims are people he experiments on in order to find a cure and save Nora. But the traditional revenge angle where Nora is already frozen works just as well for me.
While cryonics is squarely a pseudoscience, it is very much a real thing and there are people out there that have actually frozen their bodies. If reimagined through this real-world application, Freeze could be genuinely unnerving.



 
	Definitely sounds like they’re staying mum on the DCU topic because they’re in full “wait and see” mode before Superman
It would’ve been very easy to double down and give a flat out denial to that, but he left the door open… Which means it’s very much in play I’d say
But Pattinson is too young for the DCU Batman.
I think he's simply waiting to have more on his plate, such as cameras rolling on Clayface and further progression on any project where the DCU Batman will make his debut, in order to properly present the idea of two parallel Batmen instead of just talking about it without much to show.Agreed. I suspect that Gunn's come to realize that way too many people just are not onboard with the idea of there being two separate live action Batmen out there at the same time.
I agree.Definitely sounds like they’re staying mum on the DCU topic because they’re in full “wait and see” mode before Superman
It would’ve been very easy to double down and give a flat out denial to that, but he left the door open… Which means it’s very much in play I’d say
I don't think it will.I think it will end up happening.
 
				