OnLeatherWings
Sidekick
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2020
- Messages
- 1,351
- Reaction score
- 2,541
- Points
- 78
I will say that the Reeves Universe just feels very lost/out of place in the shuffle of what DC/WB has decided to do with its direction going forward.
A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
I mean, who cares? There's a massive chance it'll be significantly more successful than the direction DC/WB have decided they're going in for the next five minutes until the first thing goes wrong, they panic and everything changes. The Elseworlds projects are both safer bets than anything announced for the DCU.I will say that the Reeves Universe just feels very lost/out of place in the shuffle of what DC/WB has decided to do with its direction going forward.
To each their own, but this is pretty much the only recent superhero film I ever see brought up online. No way home kind of feels like it came and wentEh...not to be a downer, but I don't think The Batman had much cultural staying power. And I'm saying this as a fan.
As a fan, it bummed me out that it felt like by late April and May - the film was out of sight, out of mind in pop culture.
Spider-Man: No Way Home would take the cake as far as staying power since Joker. That film was a phenomenon.
I care. Because I don't trust WB a single bit.I mean, who cares?
Not from what I see. The only superhero film talk I see is how 'bad' all of them are these days.To each their own, but this is pretty much the only recent superhero film I ever see brought up online. No way home kind of feels like it came and went
I will say that the Reeves Universe just feels very lost/out of place in the shuffle of what DC/WB has decided to do with its direction going forward.
I mean, I do think the genre is dead but The Batman and Spider-Verse feel like some of the sole outliers. And, as bad as I may think it looks, Deadpool 3 too.Not from what I see. The only superhero film talk I see is how 'bad' all of them are these days.
Yeah see this is what I’m talking about. We’re gonna have a year 3 Batman older than bale was in his last movieFun and useless facts :
- When The Batman Part II is released, Robert Pattinson will be only 7 months younger than Ben Affleck was when he was announced as the grumpy old Batman for BvS. (40 years old and 5 months vs. 41 years)
- There will have been two months more between Reeves' signing on to the Batman franchise and the release of The Batman Part II than between Nolan's arrival in the same franchise and the release of his last film for it. (9 years and 8 months vs. 9 years and 6 months)
More to come as I'm obsessed by the passage of time and procrastinate very easily...
You're probably right, it can't be helping though if in fact Gunn does indeed want to introduce his own Batman. I am probably wrong but I just get the feeling that the delay is more than just about the script.I am deeply cynical about the relationship between the DCU and The Batman but I don't think a delay to another solid release date would be indicative of that.
OKAY? SIMPLY OK…Yeah see this is what I’m talking about. We’re gonna have a year 3 Batman older than bale was in his last movie
Batman to Batman Returns, 2 classics, 3 year wait. Nolan delivered a whole trilogy AND the prestige AND goddamn inception in the time it’s taking Matt Reeves to make 2 okay Batman movies. Like cmon at a certain point I start to fantasize a world where they gave the job to captain fantastic director Matt Ross instead. (CF is a beautiful film, one of my favorites, if anyone hasn’t seen it put it on your watchlist)
It said 3 picture deal dude. This has always been a trilogyWhat’s the word on Pattinon’s deal being extended for 4 films, in total now?
Yeah see this is what I’m talking about. We’re gonna have a year 3 Batman older than bale was in his last movie
Batman to Batman Returns, 2 classics, 3 year wait. Nolan delivered a whole trilogy AND the prestige AND goddamn inception in the time it’s taking Matt Reeves to make 2 okay Batman movies. Like cmon at a certain point I start to fantasize a world where they gave the job to captain fantastic director Matt Ross instead. (CF is a beautiful film, one of my favorites, if anyone hasn’t seen it put it on your watchlist)
Fun and useless facts :
- When The Batman Part II is released, Robert Pattinson will be only 7 months younger than Ben Affleck was when he was announced as the grumpy old Batman for BvS. (40 years old and 5 months vs. 41 years)
- There will have been two months more between Reeves' signing on to the Batman franchise and the release of The Batman Part II than between Nolan's arrival in the same franchise and the release of his last film for it. (9 years and 8 months vs. 9 years and 6 months)
More to come as I'm obsessed by the passage of time and procrastinate very easily... which is a terrible combo.