Interstellar - Part 6

Status
Not open for further replies.
He loved Gravity in spite of its scientific inaccuracies and Interstellar is supposed to adhere to accurate science so Im gonna bet that Neil loved the movie.
 
Cooper and his kid.

zyu5Ckz.jpg
 
Let's have a look back at a...gem from early in Matthew's career so that we can truly appreciate how far he has come.

[YT]6ZmRY2Ia9Oo[/YT]
 
What do you think guys if this movie has aliens too. I mean Edge of tomorrow has no aliens in its trailer.So, I just thought of it..
 
He loved Gravity in spite of its scientific inaccuracies and Interstellar is supposed to adhere to accurate science so Im gonna bet that Neil loved the movie.

Expect to see a lot of articles of the science in Interstellar. I predict that there will be two classes.

- Discussion as to the environmentalist prognosis. Wecan expect right wingers to say that hypothesizing environmental catastrophe is unrealistic.
- Rebuttals from other physicists. Are worm holes in this movie? They're legitimate solutions of general relativity, but that doesn't mean they exist.

It's similar to how magnetic monopoles are legitimate solutions of Maxwell's equations, yet we have never seen a north pole without a south pole.

All of that is ok I guess.
 
Hahaaa he sure does.

Now that's how you do a photoshoot though.
 
zyu5Ckz.jpg


Matthew McConaughey looks extremely tired in this pic...
 
If the closing song for this movie isn't Rocket Man, I'm flipping tables.
 
Nah, Nolan definitely has aged a bit in the last decade. I think his face is probably digitally touched up on the mag cover.
 
Nah, Nolan definitely has aged a bit in the last decade. I think his face is probably digitally touched up on the mag cover.

Nolan would hate that. He'd much rather his face be touched up with practical effects.
 
Can I say that other than a few very specific lighting choices, the film wouldn't look all that different if Wally filmed it?

Nolan has a noticeable visual style. The shot selection seems to be classic Nolan that you could trace back to Following.

i dunno, i agree that Nolan has a noticeable visual style and Interstellar does fit within that in terms of the shot selection (from what i've seen, anyways), but i definitely think Hoyte brings something different to the table. the two main components of cinematography are composition and lighting and i think there is a significant difference between how Hoyte used light on Interstellar as opposed to what Wally would have done.

the color palette of Interstellar is a bit distinct for Nolan and overall the images are a bit softer. like Wally, Hoyte doesn't shy away from contrast, but his use of it isn't as sharp or defined, it's a bit less precise and a bit more painterly. and i do think there are a few shots unlike anything i've seen in a Nolan movie before in terms of composition, like that one medium wide shot of Lithgow in silhouette sweeping the porch as dust blows through, reminded me of Spielberg and i've never said that about any shot in a Nolan movie before. i dunno if i should credit Hoyte for that or Nolan just visually exploring some of his other influences a bit more...or maybe it's a combination of the two factors.
 
After looking at Her and then looking at Interstellar I can see Hoyte's mark on the film. Mainly in colors and I guess its contrast. There are an abundance beige, yellows, browns, creames and a smattering of deep red everywhere - Hoyte's sensibilities are all over this film.

Wally's lighting and choices of colors are very different from Hoyte's in my opinion. As for the framing and layout I'd need to compare Her and Interstellar more closely and compare those two films to TDKR to really get an idea of how differently Wally and Hoyte frame things.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"