CapedCrusader14
...
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2008
- Messages
- 5,154
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
Sweet lord Anne

I like Anne's make up and hair but that dress is not good.
Yeah, that's the typical reaction with Anne stuff.Sweet lord Anne
![]()
I like Anne's make up and hair but that dress is not good.
What does that mean, his most mature Film?One last thing I'll add before I tuck myself into bed like a baby: if you DON'T like Nolan's films, this is not the movie to change that. It's a very Nolan style movie. However, if you usually buy what Nolan is selling, this will be right up your alley. It's also his most mature film to date. McConaughey is fantastic, and he and Hathaway have a great rapport with each other.
Magnificent Anne.
It does kind of look like an alien fungus is growing up the one side.
The dress is definitely not flattering Anne's figure. Chastain's dress is surprisingly boring for her.Yeah there's too much going on and it's not flattering to her waist. Her best so far is the one at the London premiere. Not a fan of Chastain's gown either (outdated). Both have great makeup and look stunning though.
http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/nov/04/-sp-christopher-nolan-interstellar-rebooted-blockbusterNo green screens were used during Interstellar, the majority of which was shot with real locations, miniatures, or sets using massive projectors. Its actually old film-making craft, says Quentin Tarantino, one of the directors Nolan called when he heard that Kodak, the last remaining manufacturer of celluloid film, was about to go under. Hes calling up directors who dont give a ****, and dealing with their apathy, and trying to explain to them how important it is. I would want to punch them in the ****ing face. But being British, he actually rises above all of that and tries to be diplomatic about it. I think it goes very well to the respect that they hold him in. Its not just a dollars and cents thing. Christopher Nolan would be just as good of a filmmaker as he is, just as a potent filmmaker as he is if he was making movies in 1975. Or, if he was making movies in 1965. Id like to see Chris Nolans version of The Battle of Bulge. That would be ****ing awesome.
At the same time, alongside this dedication to film craft lies the other strand of Nolans personality: the sceptic, pulling the rug from under the audiences feet with carefully planted secrets and second-act twists that allow his movies to build, almost with the inevitability of logical arguments, and sustain their two-to-three hour running times. Online, where deconstruction of Nolans films approaches the density of a collapsed star, argument still rages as to the significance of the endings of Memento and Inception. Part of the appeal of Memento is hes challenging you in a game to poke holes in the mystery, and the scenario, and the storytelling, said Tarantino. As opposed to something like The Sixth Sense or Fight Club where you watch it, and then you want to see it a second time to poke holes in it. Hes actually challenging you to do that. If you find a hole in it thats almost as much fun as not finding a hole.
That explains how he comes in under budget. As far as I know, budgets always have some reshoots figured in just in case.Quote from McConaughey about Nolan:
"He won't go reshoot anything. Even if he found out something was wrong I don't think he'd reshoot it."
![]()
No green screens were used during Interstellar, the majority of which was shot with real locations, miniatures, or sets using massive projectors. Its actually old film-making craft, says Quentin Tarantino, one of the directors Nolan called when he heard that Kodak, the last remaining manufacturer of celluloid film, was about to go under. Hes calling up directors who dont give a ****, and dealing with their apathy, and trying to explain to them how important it is. I would want to punch them in the ****ing face. But being British, he actually rises above all of that and tries to be diplomatic about it. I think it goes very well to the respect that they hold him in. Its not just a dollars and cents thing. Christopher Nolan would be just as good of a filmmaker as he is, just as a potent filmmaker as he is if he was making movies in 1975. Or, if he was making movies in 1965. Id like to see Chris Nolans version of The Battle of Bulge. That would be ****ing awesome.
At the same time, alongside this dedication to film craft lies the other strand of Nolans personality: the sceptic, pulling the rug from under the audiences feet with carefully planted secrets and second-act twists that allow his movies to build, almost with the inevitability of logical arguments, and sustain their two-to-three hour running times. Online, where deconstruction of Nolans films approaches the density of a collapsed star, argument still rages as to the significance of the endings of Memento and Inception. Part of the appeal of Memento is hes challenging you in a game to poke holes in the mystery, and the scenario, and the storytelling, said Tarantino. As opposed to something like The Sixth Sense or Fight Club where you watch it, and then you want to see it a second time to poke holes in it. Hes actually challenging you to do that. If you find a hole in it thats almost as much fun as not finding a hole.
Schmoes know don't really know anything.![]()
Wonder what RedLetterMedia will think.
Quote from McConaughey about Nolan:
"He won't go reshoot anything. Even if he found out something was wrong I don't think he'd reshoot it."
![]()
They only thrashed the horrid films like ASM2, Bayformers, and Baymnt. Everything else they have liked or loved.
Wait, they endoresd Rises? I am more sceptical now.
I cannot find his review, where did he say he hated it .?In other news, Harry Knowles seems to have hated the movie. For some reason this makes me giddy with anticipation.
In other news, Harry Knowles seems to have hated the movie. For some reason this makes me giddy with anticipation.