James Bond In Skyfall - - - - - Part 14

[Drizzle]

 

[Dave McFly]

that got a great reaction in the theater

 

[A Necessary Evil]

LOL

Can you upload the gif of Silva laughing at the graves?

 

[A Necessary Evil]

LOL

Can you upload the gif of Silva laughing at the graves?

 

[dark_b]

Deakins Roger Deakins

 

[dark_b]

and of course the best shot of the last 50 years. its perfect. its something that Tarantino and Nolan couldnt do with their camera.

 

[Gianakin_]

You had to put down other directors to prove the magnificence of this shot, eh?

 

[dark_b]

You had to put down other directors to prove the magnificence of this shot, eh?

when 90% of directors complain about digital camera yes. and Tarantino and mr. fanboy favorite Nolan are the leaders. Skyfall has perfect cinematography and Deakins got impossible shots because he used a digital camera. he got those shots because the camera was able to do what Tarantino and Nolan are saying can only be done with a film camera. he beat them .

and i love Django's look. love it.

 

[Gianakin_]

You think that shot is not possible with film? Really?

 

[jacobed]

Maybe one of the best shots of the year but the last 50 years mmmm no

 

[Mrs. Sawyer]

Dark, did you really have to troll this thread and incite an argument with that statement? You know you could have left out the mention of Nolan and Tarantino.

 

[jacobed]

That could easily be done with film. Easily

 

[Octoberist]

I'm shocked that we still haven't heard anything from EON in regards to Bond 24.

 

[Roose Bolton]

when 90% of directors complain about digital camera yes. and Tarantino and mr. fanboy favorite Nolan are the leaders. Skyfall has perfect cinematography and Deakins got impossible shots because he used a digital camera. he got those shots because the camera was able to do what Tarantino and Nolan are saying can only be done with a film camera. he beat them .

and i love Django's look. love it.

Thank God Deakins was able to win!

 

[dark_b]

You think that shot is not possible with film? Really?

read what lights they used and how much exposure would be needed to get a clear image with silluete's. and it was still a lot of effects combined with a clean clear image. impossible with film.

 

[Gianakin_]

Thank God Deakins was able to win!

Deakins vs. Predators: Whoever wins, we lose.

 

[Gianakin_]

read what lights they used and how much exposure would be needed to get a clear image with silluete's. and it was still a lot of effects combined with a clean clear image. impossible with film.

You... have no idea how film works, do you?

 

[Roose Bolton]

Deakins vs. Predators: Whoever wins, we lose.

Destroying downtown Tokyo in their rampage.

 

[dark_b]

You... have no idea how film works, do you?

there are two articles that i remember. in one he used the word ''impossible'' for film. i am searching for it right now.

here is the info from American Cinematography
''[FONT=&quot]Although a good light level was achieved on the set, Deakins speculates that he would have struggled to shoot this scene on film. “Not only were there extreme ranges of contrast and color, but there was also very little light at the far side of the set from the LED panels, as there were something like 10 sheets of very thick glass in the way,” he says. “That was a situation where seeing the exact image I was shooting and knowing exactly where my exposure was in terms of the contrast of the image on the LED screen was a real advantage. For me, the difference with digital is the comfort factor of seeing it and the freedom to push it further than I might on film. That Shanghai set made me realize we’d made the right choice of format. It was one of the first things we shot and was quite complicated, so it was a relief when we managed to get through 12 setups and it all looked pretty good.”
[/FONT]

 

[Gianakin_]

You do realize that he "just" lit the whole scene differently because digital requires different lghiting setup and adjustments, right? You can get this kind of image on film, but you have to go about it differently.

Not only did you misread him, you misquoted him, too.

 

[redhawk23]

and of course the best shot of the last 50 years. its perfect. its something that Tarantino and Nolan couldnt do with their camera.

.... Have you seen Kill Bill Volume One?

[YT]JwXALGorHV8[/YT]

The dynamic set decoration in the skyfall shot is interesting, but really its nothing that hasn't been seen before.

Deakins is in fact a master cinematographer, but he was just as much of a master when working on film. The instant readout from the digital camera essentially gave the benefit of making it easier to set up the shots. He says nothing about the inability of film to capture the image itself.

 

[dark_b]

You do realize that he "just" lit the whole scene differently because digital requires different lghiting setup and adjustments, right? You can get this kind of image on film, but you have to go about it differently.

Not only did you misread him, you misquoted him, too.

they were able to use more natural lighting. boom

 

[Gianakin_]

You are impossible. Or a troll. And I know it's not a language barrier. Either way, I'm done.

 

[dark_b]

.... Have you seen Kill Bill Volume One?

[YT]JwXALGorHV8[/YT]

The dynamic set decoration in the skyfall shot is interesting, but really its nothing that hasn't been seen before.

Deakins is in fact a master cinematographer, but he was just as much of a master when working on film. The instant readout from the digital camera essentially gave the benefit of making it easier to set up the shots. He says nothing about the inability of film to capture the image itself.

i dont remember seeing a movie where the background had a high contrast led display . very different with Kill Bill.

what do you mean he says nothing about the inability of film to capture the image? didnt i wrotte that i am right now searching for that article ?

 

[dark_b]

You are impossible. Or a troll. And I know it's not a language barrier. Either way, I'm done.

this exact shot with the exact same set with the same lighting rig and led displays couldnt be done with film. fact. i dont care what they would have to change on the set with film. they couldnt be able to get the soft shadows on the actors and they wouldne be able ot get the interactive soft glossy reflections on the set and floor. and so on. noone forced Nolan and Tarantino to talk in the last 5 years that with the film camera you can capture everything and with the digital not. onone.

Troll ? i on purpose wrotte Trantino and Nolan. especially Nolan . becuase i know how it is on SHH after TDK and TDKR and this f.. expensive IMAX camera that distracts actors from acting on the set. grrrrrrrrrrrr