regwec
Make Mine Marble
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2005
- Messages
- 28,473
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 33
All of which can be achieved by a projector- as seen in every professional conference everywhere.Massive tellys allow for more varied uses.
Pounds.MI6 may be paid for by tax dollars,
but if you think everything they do and pay for is on the level and the knowledge of tax auditors you're fooling yourself.
Their funding comes from the Treasury. They have to show the Treasury auditors, in detail, how they are spending their budget and why the budget needs to be retained. They might try to "cook the books", and enter the cost of a giant telly as something else, but it would still incur a cost that they could not then spend on something useful.
Government organizations routinely come up with jargon to cover up expenses and bury things to hide expenses
Which logical train are you on?
(a) MI6 can afford massive TVs because they have secret income that allows them such indulgences.
(b) MI6 uses massive TVs because it is commonplace in the public sector, and it would elicit no alarm on the part of the auditors.
(c) MI6 acquires massive TVs because it "cooks the books", and enters them on the balance sheet as paper clips or Walther PPKs.
You have suggested all three, but they each incur a measure of incompatibility with one another.
I never disputed the existence of the technology, but the plausibility of it in this context.It's irrelevent though, because that tech is current,
Not in impoverished Blighty.and is in use in the public sector.
Hell bigger TVs than that have been used, and lets not even get into projectors that run upwards of $10,000 a piece.
http://www.projectorcentral.com/conference-video-projectors.htm
Not in the public sector.



