I dunno about this casting. I always pictured Gordon as an Irish descendant. This is way off cours for me. I like the actor, but he doesn't scream Gordon to me.
Who's been played about five times in live-action by caucasian actors. Him being played by an actor of different race in this really shouldn't be an issue.While I'd agree Gordon being white isn't crucial to his character, nevertheless, he has been a white guy.
Everybody was a white guy in comics back then. For unfortunate reasons. No reason they should stay that way.While I'd agree Gordon being white isn't crucial to his character, nevertheless, he has been a white guy.
Everybody was a white guy in comics back then. For unfortunate reasons. No reason they should stay that way.
I actually do remember some fans being up in arms about Bane. I even remember Hardy commenting on it.Wright is a great choice for Gordon. I don't care about his skin color.
Nolan also white washed Bane when he cast Tom Hardy to play him, and I didn't hear a lot of people being up in arms over that.
I don't see how. If you can argue pro a casting based on not seeing it yet and/or a non popular casting choice being doing what's considered by a lot of people to be well done, why not is the flip side not appropriate?This has to be one of the worst counter-arguments I've ever heard.
Jeffrey Wright has terrific acting chops. Letoker was a combination of a number of things that eventually resulted in a horrible interpretation of the character, even Jared Leto's acting included.
It's not unreasonable to assume that Wright might deliver a good performance rather than a bad one. The former is more likely to happen than the latter given his previous roles. You seem to be presenting your opinion as neutral, yet it's clear you're disguising it as such because you dislike this choice that much and aren't willing to give it a chance thus far.
Never change, Batman fandom.
I can absolutely guarantee you that if social media existed back in 2005, there'd have been a lot of complaints about Ra'sI actually do remember some fans being up in arms about Bane. I even remember Hardy commenting on it.
I don't remember hearing so much about it with Ra's, though.
Well, that and it's a new interpretation of the character.
You want to see a white Gordon? You've got a lot of actors from previous live-action Batman media to choose from.
I think that's similar to saying I should be fine with Leto's Joker or Eisenberg's Lex because there are perceived better versions out there. I don't agree with either statement. What's wrong with not being pro casting based on it not looking like the character, whether by skin color, height, weight, body type or facial structure? Am I wrong for not wanting Adam Driver as Batman based on his facial features?Who's been played about five times in live-action by caucasian actors. Him being played by an actor of different race in this really shouldn't be an issue.
Yeah. A lot of people are either unintentionally or maliciously ignoring the fact that most these characters were created in the 40-60's period. America was strictly an apartheid state then.
Hollywood is approaching it as if these characters were made today. That's what a reboot is. It's the same reason why you won't see every character with a cigarette in their mouth. Or every male slapping a woman in the ass. They are approaching these characters ANEW from a 21st century standpoint.
what does that connect to? If the character was done now, whose to say he wouldn't be white?Of course he was. He was created in 39. I don't have to go into a history lesson to know why he and everyone was white.
the character's drawn as white. As far as I know Blade being black isn't based in some deeply rooted character heritage thing, but that character is black and I don't see why that should be changed. Same with Jim.Also, how the hell is Gordon a "white" character? Is he a reformed KKK member? Is that a part of his character? LMAO.
I don't see why needing to be white is the point. The character of Jim is white. I don't see why it needs to be changed. Though I'd argue when you're saying Bruce needs to be white but others don't, that you're picking and choosing. I wouldn't want it, but if one can be race changed by your perception, why not everyone?Which doesn’t add up at all. Their characters don’t need to be white. I’d argue that Bruce Wayne needs to be white. But Gordon doesn’t.
I take it as a case by case basis, depending either/or on the actor cast/ the role they're cast in.I brought up both Bane and Ra's so many times. I always got the "Nolan is god, so who cares" comments. But now people are going straight to racism. Bizarre.
...It’s like Michael Caine playing Leo’s father...just doesn’t add up.

D...do you really not know basic history?what does that connect to?
He wouldn't only be white. He can now be more than simply white. There are no legal barriers any moreIf the character was done now, whose to say he wouldn't be white?
the character's drawn as white.
Talk like this undermine your argument about race not mattering in choosing an actor. Comparing hair color or whether or not someone has a beard to another persons racial heritage is like comparing what clothes someone wears or doesn't wear to as if he is right for the part.And Thor is drawn beardless. Is Hemsworth therefore miscast?
Harvey Dent is drawn with dark hair. Was blonde Eckhart miscast?
You can't use the way a character is drawn as a crutch to casting flesh and blood actor.