On another thread, an interesting article from the Hollywood Reporter was posted. It talks about how studios are going to try harder to have budgets less than 200 mill. The article comments on WWZ, Star Trek, and MOS. All of them had their profits hampered somewhat by their huge budgets. The article mentions capping a WWZ sequel at 160. Paramount will also try to save money on a Star Trek Sequel.
It says the MOS sequel is shooting in Michigan to save money. The first film did not receive comparable rebates from the three shooting locations as it will with Michigan.
agreedI think its about time really. Production budgets really went nuts in the past 6 years or so (starting with Spider-Man 3's 258 millions in 2007).
When you think about what someone like Snyder was able to achieve visually, in terms of scale with a 130 millions budget on Watchmen, nothing really justifies, in terms of production values, the extra 100 millions or so that was spent on Man Of Steel (or the extra 40 millions Star Trek Into Darkness got compared to the 2009 film for that matter).
It's about time studios regain some control over how they spend their money.
Man Of Steel logically ended up in the "Toss-up" category of BoM's breaking down on summer's releases:
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=3724&p=.htm
it cost 35mil less to make and mos made 253mil more so a.strech in deedYou would have to take in account that Pacific Rim was less expensive to produce than MoS (by a 35m margin) and is an original film. Therefore the film carried completely different expectation and that's probably one of the reasons why PR got the safer spot in July in the first place.
Now I don't know how Pacific Rim was funded and all the financial engineering behind it, but given that it made most of its business overseas, particularly in China, I think that despite those 400 millions it still translates onto a significant loss for WB/Legendary. At least until they can factor in the side revenues.
So I would have to agree it's a bit of a stretch indeed.
So any numbers on Japans BO this week guys? Or a Japan total so far?
Foreign numbers tend to come in on Monday afternoon. For the last few weeks WB has been waiting until late Monday to release the numbers for MoS even for domestic, so we won't know until Late Monday or early Tuesday to have a clear picture of the weekend box office.
Domestically it is almost at a standstill, yet movies like STID are in a 1000 or so theaters and are still making decent money. Just to add, STID has been out nearly 30 days longer than MOS.
WW boxoffice and user/rating is pretty much pointless. Who the f cares how much a studio pays to make a film. It's not my money. It's not the fans money. If the movie flops at the box office yeah we might not get a sequel to that film but at the end of the day you the fan will own it on home video no matter how money it makes. (that's if you like it).
The same goes for user/critic rating. I like the Transformers movies and with all the critic and fan complaining look how popular those movies are and the huge amount of money they have made. Alot of people must like/love those movies but you read here and other internet places that those films suck.
Who are in the right consensus the "Fans here" or the general movie going public. What makes or labels someone a fan???
Everybody I've met f n'g loved MOS. Loved that Superman killed Zod. Loved the action. They loved the things that most Internet fans complain about. They would of had to of liked Superman in some way or another to go see MOS be it they might not watch the animated shows or read the comic books but are still fans of the character.
Yeah, last week was kind of a shock considering the regal "re-release". It lost a lot of screens. Of interesting note, is that it was averaging more per screen than STiD and WWZ while having a much small screen count. I am curious to how the money was counted for the STiD/WWZ double feature. Was the money split or do they both get to count the full amount the brought in for the double feature?
Domestically, it is pretty likely that MoS is pretty much done. I will crawl over 291 unless there is true rerelease to push the blu ray release which I don't feel is likely to happen.
But like I said in an earlier post...the only number that matters to me at this point is 07172015!
WW boxoffice and user/rating is pretty much pointless. Who the f cares how much a studio pays to make a film. It's not my money. It's not the fans money. If the movie flops at the box office yeah we might not get a sequel to that film but at the end of the day you the fan will own it on home video no matter how money it makes. (that's if you like it).
The same goes for user/critic rating. I like the Transformers movies and with all the critic and fan complaining look how popular those movies are and the huge amount of money they have made. Alot of people must like/love those movies but you read here and other internet places that those films suck.
Who are in the right consensus the "Fans here" or the general movie going public. What makes or labels someone a fan???
Everybody I've met f n'g loved MOS. Loved that Superman killed Zod. Loved the action. They loved the things that most Internet fans complain about. They would of had to of liked Superman in some way or another to go see MOS be it they might not watch the animated shows or read the comic books but are still fans of the character.
Didn't understand your point buddy... I´m a fan and I loved the movie...You are only a fan if you think the movie was terrible. True story.
Man of Steel did as well at the Box Office as I expected. It made 266 million more than Returns. I'd say it's a success. But judging Wu's decision to put Batman in the sequel, it's evident that WB is hungry for that billion dollar gross.