Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]460413[/split]
There won't be. Contracts are already in place. It's Snyder and Goyer or bust.
Well, I'm still glad for that. The question is, what kind of interference will they run into this time around?
God, I'm already not looking forward to the sequel now and that's sad because Man of Steel, I think, really ****ing works.
Well, I'm still glad for that. The question is, what kind of interference will they run into this time around?
God, I'm already not looking forward to the sequel now and that's sad because Man of Steel, I think, really ****ing works.
Thanks for continue the doom and gloom. We get it. You want a different creative team.
Well with Legendary out of the picture and Nolan having little to no creative input (his choice) there's currently no one around to interfere. It'll be all Snyder and Goyer, until WB states otherwise or hires someone to oversee DC movies. But we all know how well that worked out last time
Why is it that when someone disagrees or find certain aspects of MOS not ideal suddenly translate to that person either 'a hater' or 'doom and gloom'...
Lots of people wasn't enthralled by goyer's script... and lots of people wanted him to be at least teamed up with someone else... that is one very consistent complain about MOS...
The movie is good, but could have been great!!!! And goyer doesn't have my vote to get to 'great'...
I'm I in understanding that without Legendary, the new creative force for future DC movies will be from the same folks who helped produce GL?
Originally Posted by robot
I highly doubt they demanded 80%...
Not necessarily. Different producers, directors and writers. But it is similar in the way that GL was a fully financed WB movie unlike MOS and TDK trilogy
Disney did. for Iron Man 3. That's why AMC stopped all pre-sales and "refunded" people's orders. But Disney called their bluff
Oh so you're the one
How do you think it got to 200 million worldwide?
because tobias has been saying the same thing for 20 pages. That's why. Not saying he can't have an opinion but sheesh, 20 pages of the same thing?
Ryan Reynolds bought 1.2 million tickets. In 3D.
And you saw it the other 12 times.
I meant in the sense that they were run by DC entertainment. With Legendary gone would DC Entertainment take over in some capacity? You would think it would be a good thing if DC got more heavily involved in their films but, yea...Green Lantern.
Not necessarily. Different producers, directors and writers. But it is similar in the way that GL was a fully financed WB movie unlike MOS and TDK trilogy
Disney did. for Iron Man 3. That's why AMC stopped all pre-sales and "refunded" people's orders. But Disney called their bluff
In addition to new leadership at the studio under the helm of CEO Kevin Tsujihara, Warner Bros. is looking to take more control over films based on DCs superheroes and not offer the projects up to co-financiers the way it let Legendary back Christopher Nolans Batman trilogy, Superman Returns and Man of Steel.
Doesn't say anything about DC Entertainment running the movie-verse. As it looks WB will handle the films from now on the same way they handle all of their other movies. That studio likes to operate on a one-strike policy. DCE had their chance with GL and botched it every way imaginable. And remember, WB let them call ALL the shots with the exception of hiring Martin Campbell.
Not necessarily. Different producers, directors and writers. But it is similar in the way that GL was a fully financed WB movie unlike MOS and TDK trilogy
Disney did. for Iron Man 3. That's why AMC stopped all pre-sales and "refunded" people's orders. But Disney called their bluff
The decision comes a week after AMC and Regal Entertainment, the nation's largest theater chain, stopped selling advance tickets for the movie, amid objections over how much revenue Disney wanted to collect on "Iron Man 3" and other upcoming films.
Sources said Disney was seeking up to 65% of ticket sales for "Iron Man 3," well above the 50% to 55% that studios typically collect.
AMC's Chief Executive Gerry Lopez told the Los Angeles Times during the CinemaCon convention last week that Disney's stance "puts us in a very, very uncomfortable situation."
Why is it that when someone disagrees or find certain aspects of MOS not ideal suddenly translate to that person either 'a hater' or 'doom and gloom'...
Lots of people wasn't enthralled by goyer's script... and lots of people wanted him to be at least teamed up with someone else... that is one very consistent complain about MOS...
The movie is good, but could have been great!!!! And goyer doesn't have my vote to get to 'great'...
Do you have a source for the 80%? I still find it hard to believe...
Yup. It has to be great. There will be even more riding on MOS2's BO than on MOS. If it doesn't get huge numbers that puts JL in jeopardy as well as MOS3. Like you I don't see Goyer getting to great either.
I hope someone from WB is at ComiCon to answer some questions. So far I can't find where they will be there. That Snyder isn't apparently going to be there from what I've seen so far, they could add him at the last minute, I don't think WB will issue any announcement about their next film at next month's ComiCon.
Yup. It has to be great. There will be even more riding on MOS2's BO than on MOS. If it doesn't get huge numbers that puts JL in jeopardy as well as MOS3. Like you I don't see Goyer getting to great either.
I hope someone from WB is at ComiCon to answer some questions. So far I can't find where they will be there. That Snyder isn't apparently going to be there from what I've seen so far, they could add him at the last minute, I don't think WB will issue any announcement about their next film at next month's ComiCon.