Hello spidey!
Obviously I am aware of the Avengers origins, but the simple fact of the matter is that Loki means more to the Thor franchise than he ever will to the Avengers franchise.
If you have Thor beat Loki in the Thor movie then its going to be underwhelming (to say the least) using Loki as the villain of the Avengers movie.
I never said Thor should beat Loki in the Thor film. I think all of these solo films should lead into the Avengers film. Have Thor fail to stop Loki in the Thor film and then pick up persuing him in the Avengers.
Whereas Kang IS the quintessential Avengers villain, with Ultron a close second.
So vilain wise, you'd just wanna go on and blow your wad with the first movie, huh? ooo-kay.

Can you not be patient and let these things happen in their due time? If Kang IS the ultimate Avengers villain, wouldn't you want to save him for the 2nd or 3rd film, really wrap up the trilogy with a bang? Guess not. I bet you LOVED X3.
I'm not saying that you couldn't do an Avengers movie with Loki as the main antagonist, simply that I think it would hurt the Thor franchise to use Loki therein.
I don't see that at all. Loki could be the main villain in the first Thor film, nearly beat Thor and his armies, and narrowly escape to Earth where...
We see at the start of the Avengers film, he is using the Hulk to isolate Thor far from Asgard and lure him into a trap. From there Thor meets the other heroes and they realize they are basically fighting a common enemy. The Hulk wouldn't stick around for future Avengers films and Thor could move onto some other of his rogues gallery in future solo films (as I'd hope he'd do even if Loki DIDN'T appear in the Avengers film so I don't know where you get the whole "loki being in the Avengers will hurt the Thor franchise" thing!).
You're crossing the streams here. As regards Thor, we are talking about building from Asgard to Earth - thats simply idiotic, as I already explained.
Well, we're both stating opinion, but if your going to stoop to calling things idiotic, I'll merely ask you: Where did Thor come from? And where did he end up? According to your logic, any story that took place after one of his many adventures in Asgard must have been idiotic which as anyone else knows is clearly NOT the case.
As for the Avengers battling Hulk on Earth - if thats your big finale you need your head examined! The Avengers movie needs to be "off the charts" in terms of epic scale...frankly this is a problem I see for any eventual Avengers movie (half the characters are relatively weak).
Oh my Lord! Again, you contradict your own statement about how important it is to stick to the comic as closely as possible by telling me I need to have my head examined for suggesting that...they stick to the comic by having them fight the Hulk on earth...just like they did in the comic!! What do you want, them fighting the Hulk on the Deathstar with lightsabers and the help of Darth Vader and Aragorn's Elf Army? Man, that would be just off the charts in terms of epic scale!! And pretty lame as well. If you don't like the original premise, take it up with Stan Lee.
Clearly you are someone of little taste.
Well, I am conversing with you, but if that's the way you choose to believe...
