Endgame Official Avengers: Endgame News & Speculation Thread!

[Flash525]

Can't believe I didn't notice this earlier, but who's the woman in the reflection?

 

[Aximili86]

What are we even looking at in the top screengrab there? I can't make it out too well, Natasha looking out of some concrete bunker in the Avengers compound?

 

[matt47]

Endgame blanket

Merchandise is where we are gonna get most of the spoilers aye. Kinda wish I didn't see Hulk yet.

 

[Marvolo]

What are we even looking at in the top screengrab there? I can't make it out too well, Natasha looking out of some concrete bunker in the Avengers compound?

It seems to be the Aether in liquid form in its stone container. Look at this clip from The Dark World:




On another note, have yall heard the theory that Thanos didnt kill the ashed people when he snapped rather the ashed people were sent to an alternate universe? The theory goes on to speculate that it cant be undone and the two universes cant be rejoined and the OG avengers that didnt get sent to the alternate universe will stay in the original universe and all the ashed people stay in the alternate universe. Future MCU films would be set in the alternate universe with the ashed characters. It would certainly be a reason for Cap and Tony not appearing in future films. They would be in the original universe. And if those actors decided to ever return their character could travel from the original universe to the alternate universe.

The theory also speculates that the Xmen will exist in the alternate universe.

 

[Aximili86]

It's interesting speculation in an academic sense, can't see it happening though. Seems a little convoluted for the general audiences, and I don't smell Marvel going for a branching-timelines Fox-XMen type of thing.

 

[Flash525]

On another note, have yall heard the theory that Thanos didnt kill the ashed people when he snapped rather the ashed people were sent to an alternate universe? The theory goes on to speculate that it cant be undone and the two universes cant be rejoined and the OG avengers that didnt get sent to the alternate universe will stay in the original universe and all the ashed people stay in the alternate universe. Future MCU films would be set in the alternate universe with the ashed characters. It would certainly be a reason for Cap and Tony not appearing in future films. They would be in the original universe. And if those actors decided to ever return their character could travel from the original universe to the alternate universe.

I hadn't heard this until I read about it here, but I'll put it on the shelve with all the other ludicrous theories that aren't going to be.

The snap will be undone, I can almost guarantee that. It's the result and consequences of traveling through the Quantum Realm and what undoing the snap does that'll be responsible for any changes and loss of characters moving forward.

Honestly, I've read some spectacularly bizarre theories surrounding Infinity War and Endgame. Fans will leech on to the smallest detail in an effort to explain something, and even if a theory sounds like it makes sense, and probably does, it's not going to be the end result. Most of them are based on desire and wishful thinking; like Loki secretly being Banner. WTH is that all about?

 

[Panacea]

What are we even looking at in the top screengrab there? I can't make it out too well, Natasha looking out of some concrete bunker in the Avengers compound?

It's Jane Foster in a screencap from Thor: The Dark World.

There was a theory (leak?) that...

Spoiler

...the Avengers would travel back in time through their history and past movies, collecting the Infinity Stones in Endgame.

 

[Iceman]

I hadn't heard this until I read about it here, but I'll put it on the shelve with all the other ludicrous theories that aren't going to be.

The snap will be undone, I can almost guarantee that. It's the result and consequences of traveling through the Quantum Realm and what undoing the snap does that'll be responsible for any changes and loss of characters moving forward.

Honestly, I've read some spectacularly bizarre theories surrounding Infinity War and Endgame. Fans will leech on to the smallest detail in an effort to explain something, and even if a theory sounds like it makes sense, and probably does, it's not going to be the end result. Most of them are based on desire and wishful thinking; like Loki secretly being Banner. WTH is that all about?

Loki is Banner? First I've heard of that one.

 

[Iceman]

If this is 3hrs, I do hope they insert an intermission. I have a weak bladder, and though I made it through several long movies without going to the restroom and I rarely use the restroom the first time I see a movie, I'd rather not have the end of the movie tainted for me by thinking to myself "Wrap up so I can go to the bathroom!!!"An intermission would be nice, LOL

The worst part is that anyone who needs to go will probably miss a later, more important part of the film, assuming they don't need to go early on. My friend who doesn't get to go to the cinema much with a big young family missed the Darth Vader part in Rogue One and didn't see it for months!

The main thing I get from the intermission talk is that it looks like they really want the film to be long and understand that it needs to be (which is great). And whatever they decide, it's worth considering the best option.

 

[Flash525]

It's Jane Foster in a screencap from Thor: The Dark World.

There was a theory (leak?) that...

Spoiler

...the Avengers would travel back in time through their history and past movies, collecting the Infinity Stones in Endgame.

Assuming that is the Reality Stone, why on earth is Clint near it? Surely he's not capable of touching or handling it? He's just a mere human after all.

Loki is Banner? First I've heard of that one.

I've read it several times (on here too - honestly I'm surprised you haven't). In short, IIRC, it's the reason Banner never [actually] transforms into Hulk - it's because he can't, because he's actually Loki.

Like I said above, absurd theory, but that's the levels some fans will go to.

 

[Iceman]

I've read it several times (on here too - honestly I'm surprised you haven't). In short, IIRC, it's the reason Banner never [actually] transforms into Hulk - it's because he can't, because he's actually Loki.

Like I said above, absurd theory, but that's the levels some fans will go to.

Oh wow.

 

[Spider-Fan]

(1) Go to the bathroom either during the previews or especially here after the first preview.
(2) See if you can ask theater staff when they expect the actual movie to start, then go to the bathroom ten minutes before. That's what I did for IW. They know how long the trailers are, how long the film is, and the exact time it gets out. Better to go to miss some of the previews rather than risk having to go during (when the films are this long).
(4) Don't drink right before you go in nor during.

I don't mean for this reply to sound rude, but I have been going to the movies for almost 30 years. I am well aware of how to try to limit the chances of going to the restroom during the movie. Nothing you suggest here is Earth shattering, new, or anything that I don't already do. But call me old fashioned, but for a movie like this, I want to experience the movie. I best enjoy experiencing a movie with snacks. So my preference would be give me a few minutes during this long movie I don't want to miss so I can actually drink something.

 

[Spider-Fan]

Another thing people have to remember: getting people into the cinema is one thing, but movie theaters make more money on concessions than the ticket itself. So I think they would prefer a 10 min intermission and people buying popcorn/snacks over just having more people come to the movie and skipping the snacks (like I would) so they don't go to the bathroom.

 

[Iceman]

Another thing people have to remember: getting people into the cinema is one thing, but movie theaters make more money on concessions than the ticket itself. So I think they would prefer a 10 min intermission and people buying popcorn/snacks over just having more people come to the movie and skipping the snacks (like I would) so they don't go to the bathroom.

Yeah, I mentioned this earlier. It’s a big part of their income and they don’t have to split the revenue with anyone unlike the ticket proceeds. They would sell a fair bit more in this case I think. Speaking just for myself, if there were an intermission I would feel free to buy exactly what I wanted rather than not drink anything during or even before the film.

 

[starscream]

The only downside of the midnight premiers here on the 24th here, is that they skip the previews and go straight to the movie. So no drinking before the movie for me

 

[samsnee]

Honestly, someone who sees it early just needs to tweet out the best time to go to the bathroom and not miss anything major.

 

[Thanoss]

seems that a lot of you look at campea show

 

[Spider-Fan]

Honestly, someone who sees it early just needs to tweet out the best time to go to the bathroom and not miss anything major.

Honestly, I hate using the restroom at all during a movie. Even parts I know are slow. So this wouldn't work for me either.

 

[Mjolnir Reborn]

I don't have any issues with sitting through 3 hours as long as I do a little bit of fluid planning for the hours before the film. If I do that it doesn't matter if I drink something during the film, I probably won't even have to go when the film is over.

 

[Ninjablade]

Honestly, I hate using the restroom at all during a movie. Even parts I know are slow. So this wouldn't work for me either.

Yeah this is how I am too. If I’ve seen the movie already, I’m more lenient on it, but I try not to leave the theater at all unless it’s an emergency. I tend to sit towards the middle of an aisle, and I don’t like having move past a bunch of people disturbing them.

Personally I don’t usually drink anything when I see a movie and go to the bathroom before I encter the theater, but I know that’s not the same for everyone. A little worried about the long runtime because I’d rather not be sitting during my first showing and constantly having to let people get by me so they can leave. Especially towards the end of the film.

 

[samsnee]

I don't like leaving either, but when you gotta go, you gotta go, you know?

 

[KaijuDude1992]

I'll just do what I did with IW and not eat or drink anything atleast 2 to 3 hours of me seeing the movie. It has worked for me before, and with a movie like this I definitely don't want to miss anything, especially if the 3 hour running time sticks. As for the intermission stuff I'd be fine with it, but I'm not going to lie that it could probably end up somewhat hurting the momentum of the film.

 

[psylockolussus]

I don't like leaving either, but when you gotta go, you gotta go, you know?

And you can just watch it again. No problem.

 

[Spider-Fan]

And you can just watch it again. No problem.

But you only get to experience a movie the first time once, and I like to have that be a complete experience and see everything the first time.

 

[DyeLorean]

I had to go soooo damn badly during Homecoming that I missed the car scene between Vulture and Peter. I didn't know about that scene until I saw the blu-ray.