I thought she only considered him her father in the comics, despite her not actually being his daughter.But if it's Polaris then she would be a kid as Mags is her father. While I would love to see Erik's children in a movie, I think he is still too young to be the father of a teen-20 something.
But if it's Polaris then she would be a kid as Mags is her father. While I would love to see Erik's children in a movie, I think he is still too young to be the father of a teen-20 something.
X-Men First Class sequel plans revealed: Flower Power, the '70s and Professor X "really messed up"
The talent behind X-Men: First Class have revealed possible ideas for the next chapters in the mutant superhero saga. The ending of First Class sets up a potential sequel that will be “even more fun”, according to director Matthew Vaughn.
“First Class is similar to Batman Begins, where you have the fun of introducing the characters and getting to know them, but that takes time,” says Vaughn. “But with the second one you can just get on with it and have a rollicking good time,” he continues. “That’s the main difference between Begins and The Dark Knight.”
With First Class set in 1962, part two could move on to the late ‘60s – a period Vaughn is keen to x-plore.
“1962 is far more grounded in the world of the ’50s,” he says. “I think it takes about five years for a decade to really start getting its identity, so the fun thing about this for me would be doing [a sequel] in the latter part of the decade, where you’ve got The Stones, The Beatles, Flower Power…”
There’s also the possibility that the next chapters in the planned First Class trilogy will be set in the 70s and 80s respectively. “That’s an idea that’s been discussed,” admits producer Bryan Singer. “How the characters go through time. But only to a point – they can’t age too fast!”
http://www.totalfilm.com/news/x-men-first-class-sequel-plans-revealed
t:The next film likely takes place in the late 60s or early 70s. Thus, no timeline problem with him being the father of a teen or 20 something.
Well Fox are against having characters with the same or similar powers usually so I don't think Polaris would be in the sequel anyway and as Chaseter said Erik is about 30 in the movie so Lorna if she existed would only be 10 or perhaps 11 at the oldest
Um, teleporting, superstrength, telepathy, flight, energy channeling are all similar if not the same powers in these X-Men films.

Hey its not my logic its Fox say. They thought Gambit and Cyclops powers were too similar to be in a X-Men movie but then put him in Wolverine in which cyclops is in
Fox Exec logic is a law to its self
I thought it was Donners idea mostly she usually comes up with those kind of stupid ideasI thought that was Singer's logic?![]()

I thought it was Donners idea mostly she usually comes up with those kind of stupid ideas![]()
Erik is in his early 30s in this film. If the next movie is set in 1969 or the early 70s he would have had to father a child when he was like 18 if Polaris is going to be late teens or early 20s.
lol, yeah, but no. I can't see it happening.That isn't exactly an abnormal age in that era for men to have sex and potentally have a child. Given the lack of birth control methods women also had children at a much younger age.
lol, yeah, but no. I can't see it happening.
What about... LILANDRA ?
![]()