def28
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2008
- Messages
- 12,746
- Reaction score
- 184
- Points
- 75
Is M.O.D.O.K. too out of left field for character possibility?
Does Fox even own Modok?
Is M.O.D.O.K. too out of left field for character possibility?
MODOK makes no sense because that character has absolutely nothing to do with DOFP or X-Men in general, really. It's just people trying to fit Dinklage into some box because of his height.
I would say he has questionable rights issues. I don't know who what studio has dibs on him
No idea, I was going with the idea someone said about him playing a scientist earlier in the thread.Does Fox even own Modok?
No more sillier than the rest of the characters he could be playing that others have guessed.MODOK makes no sense because that character has absolutely nothing to do with DOFP or X-Men in general, really. It's just people trying to fit Dinklage into some box because of his height.
Not to mention, he would just be plain silly on screen.
No idea, I was going with the idea someone said about him playing a scientist earlier in the thread.
No more sillier than the rest of the characters he could be playing that others have guessed.
As for not having anything to do with comic version of DoFP or X-Men in general doesn't really mean anything to me; Singer has changed characters inclusions before in his X-movies, and it works.
I'm still seeing him as Puck working with Wolvie in the 70s.![]()
Curious why everyone is as pumped about this guy as they seem to be. Last I saw him was on NipTuck and a few movies.
oh wait, there was some big genre project that gave him a PR boost recently wasn't there. Thank goodness this isn't 4 years ago. Hollywood is an interesting place.
Singer seems to be back in the hot circle again as well.
Variety says he's the 'main antagonist'.
I also doubt Fox has the rights to Puck.
I think he's Bantam
Does Fox even own Modok?
Hoping MTV is correct. Dinklage as Trask is genius.
FANTASTIC casting. Dinklage will soon sit alongside McKellen and Fox as the great X-Men antagonists.