Headless Knight
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2001
- Messages
- 501
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
nosebleed said:vs realistic? vs SJ willing to do a topless shot? **** That!
Lol, and she suggested it. He didn't even have to ask.
nosebleed said:vs realistic? vs SJ willing to do a topless shot? **** That!
well at least he aint uwe boll............that poor fool begsHeadless Knight said:Lol, and she suggested it. He didn't even have to ask.
Timstuff said:I think The Island could have been a bigger success if the stupid marketing department didn't insist on giving away the entire freakin' movie in the trailer. They shouldn't have even let people know it was about clones until after it was out.
Theweepeople said:I don't agree with this. I think Brett Ratner represents everything that is wrong with Hollywood. That hack spends more time hanging out with the cast of his films than paying attention to critical details in the movies he directs. At least Micheal Bay has proven on more than one occasion that he can make a good blockbuster film.
bunk said:I guess you haven't seen Red Dragon.
Timstuff said:He begs and ends up being denied anyway. Michael Bay apparently though has such a great effect on his actors that he's in a position to turn down their offers. And since The Island was always set to be a PG-13 movie, that's probably why he told SJ to keep the bra on.
I think The Island could have been a bigger success if the stupid marketing department didn't insist on giving away the entire freakin' movie in the trailer. They shouldn't have even let people know it was about clones until after it was out.
Headless Knight said:That one sucks monkey balls. Hopkins acting was so over-the-top I almost thought I was seeing a satire.
NikeHead said:I agree with you about the Island being totally given away by the movie trailers. I had seen the trailers and then saw it at a friends house when it came out on DVD, and having seen the trailers, the plot was already given to me. But my cousin and friends who were watchin it hadn't seen the trailers and didn't know the whole clone deal until it got to that part. They were getting confused up until that point saying, "What's going on? I don't get it." and I would ask them, "You guys haven't seen the trailers?" Because they didn't see the trailers, they ended up enjoying the movie and the plot was ruined for people who watched the trailers like me. Overall I still liked the movie and I think that Bay will be able to do this movie some right.
Headless Knight said:Did you know that, when filming the sex scene in The Island, Scarlett Johansson wanted to show her breasts because it would make the scene more realistic but Bay insisted that she kept her bra on?
That's the kind of guy Michael Bay is.
nosebleed said:I agree here. While I like Ed Norton in the majority of his films, he seems very uninspired in his role in Red Dragon...just going through the motions.
CherryRedSpider said:Bay is going to have a problem with Prime then. That Autobot is all about the frontal nudes.
bunk said:Maybe...I was thinking about Ratner's directing which was solid, not so much the acting. Especially after watching Hannibal.
nosebleed said:Ratner's directing is key to pulling a solid performance out of his actors/actresses. A prime example is the SW prequels. They had great actors/actresses with some very dry, boring acting. Who's fault was this? The actors/actresses or the director?
nosebleed said:Ratner's directing is key to pulling a solid performance out of his actors/actresses. A prime example is the SW prequels. They had great actors/actresses with some very dry, boring acting. Who's fault was this? The actors/actresses or the director?
bunk said:Writer, who incidentally is the same person.
An experienced actor can deal with a bad director but not a bad script.
xwolverine2 said:Lecter haters!!!
you will all burn!
yeah thats Dr. lecter alrightHeadless Knight said:Nothing against Lecter, my problem is Anthony Hopkins' slurp-slurp-I'm-a-psycho characterization.
Headless Knight said:Sorry, you're wrong. The director is the key element in making an actor's talent come to life.
The script has little to do with it, because the actors are going to read it once ou twice in pre-production (when they do it, sometimes they don't even memorize their lines) and then, months later, when they get to the point of filming it, they already forgot at least a large portion of it.
And besides, movies are not filmed chronologically. Sometimes the first thing you film are the final scenes. So, imagine if the actors depended mainly on the script. They'd be totally lost.
When filming a scene, It's the director's job to make sure the actors understand what their characters are feeling in that particular moment, and how to express it. Trust me on this one, bud.
xwolverine2 said:yeah thats Dr. lecter alright![]()
Headless Knight said:I guess you haven't read the books.![]()
Headless Knight said:Lol, I like a lot of Hollywood popcorn stuff too, including most of Spielberg's work.
I love Jaws, Close Encounters, E.T., Riders of the Lost Ark, War of the Worlds, etc. And I also like several of his "artistic" movies (I love A.I. and Schindler's List, and I thought Munich was very good).
So don't get me wrong, Spielberg is one of the best american directors of all time, he's just not impervious to a few missteps in his career.
nosebleed said:Ratner's directing is key to pulling a solid performance out of his actors/actresses. A prime example is the SW prequels. They had great actors/actresses with some very dry, boring acting. Who's fault was this? The actors/actresses or the director?
bunk said:Why should I should I trust you?