Scream 4!!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
It just doesn't make sense for Dewey to be the killer. As someone mentioned before, he's now the sheriff of the town he loves and married to the woman of his dreams. What possible motive would he have?
 
Twas I who brought up why the heck would any of them? The only one of the three that makes slight sense is Gale since she's apparently bored in Woodsboro and has written alot of ****** sequels to her books featuring Ghostface.

Dewey is the Sheriff of Woodsboro (the only character who still loved Woodsboro by the end of the trilogy), and has the woman of his dreams.

Sidney's just now completely healed and has written her self-help book. Those two just don't make sense in the slightest.

Even Gale. I don't see her doing that as it'd be a total waste of developing her character in 2 and 3 to being a nicer gentler Gale who used her *****yness for the side of good.
 
yeah - but all that can be undone as time goes by.

Dewey is just.... not in his character. I'm sorry. I don't see him as the type to "crack." He is Sidney's rock, and really just an honest straight up good person.

Gale is selfish to some extent and Sid is damaged. And while I don't see Sid being the killer cuz just about everyone of the normies out there think she will be they won't. I don't see them having ghostface repeatedly go after her in the movie just to throw the other characters off. Just a lot of overall let down if they revealed her in the end to be involved.

Gale I could see.

But Dewey and Sid are safe, IMO.

But I trust in Williamson and Craven to deliver.

- Jow
 
I see Sid and Dewey's relationship as being similar to Laurie Strode and Dr. Loomis in Halloween. (Granted, Michael did eventually kill Loomis.)
 
In one timeline of the Halloween series he did, but that's the Halloween - Halloween 6 timeline. THen yeah Loomis was killed by Michael

If you count the canon one according to Jamie Lee Curtis and the people between H20 and Resurrection. Then Loomis died of old age protecting Laurie's secret.
 
JustABill said:
In one timeline of the Halloween series he did, but that's the Halloween - Halloween 6 timeline. THen yeah Loomis was killed by Michael

If you count the canon one according to Jamie Lee Curtis and the people between H20 and Resurrection. Then Loomis died of old age protecting Laurie's secret.
Click to expand...

I know H20 paid tribute to Loomis at the very beginning of the movie. I don't remember them ever saying he 'died of old age while protecting her secret' though. :huh:
 
Didn't Pleasance die in real life tho and they just wrote the character out?

- Jow

PS: Kickass - the only question I would want answered is this: Is there more than one killer in S4? That's it. You don't have to say if there's 2 or 3 or 20. Just if it's one person or multiple. Thats the only spoiler I'd want to ask.
 
Marx said:
I know H20 paid tribute to Loomis at the very beginning of the movie. I don't remember them ever saying he 'died of old age while protecting her secret' though. :huh:
Click to expand...
It was assumed and spoken in interviews about the film that that was what happened in the H20 timeline. Marion Chambers, the nurse killed in the beginning is the same Nurse who worked with Loomis in Halloween 1 and 2. They explained that she was taking care of Loomis as he got older and more frail and Loomis trusted her with Laurie's files and secrets. That's why Michael came to her and attacked her.
 
JustABill said:
It was assumed and spoken in interviews about the film that that was what happened in the H20 timeline. Marion Chambers, the nurse killed in the beginning is the same Nurse who worked with Loomis in Halloween 1 and 2. They explained that she was taking care of Loomis as he got older and more frail and Loomis trusted her with Laurie's files and secrets. That's why Michael came to her and attacked her.
Click to expand...

I remember the nurse being the same actress. I'll have to re-watch it. Either way, Halloween, Halloween II and Halloween: H20 are the only ones that matter to me.
icon11.gif
 
^^ Lol, no love for Halloweeen II 4, 5, or 6? They're all good in their own way. Halloween 4 was awesom (IMO), halloween 5 was good, 6 was okay (producer's cut was better), but Ressurection? That sucked.
 
I just hope the viral cam storyline from Scream 4 works better than it did in Halloween: Resurrection.

It was boring as hell.

- Jow
 
Marx said:
I remember the nurse being the same actress. I'll have to re-watch it. Either way, Halloween, Halloween II and Halloween: H20 are the only ones that matter to me.
icon11.gif
Click to expand...

This, it's a perfect trilogy that way. Laurie killed Michael, and Loomis dies of old age.

There is no "daughter" Jamie or Busta Reeves in my Halloween.

The only redeeming qualities of H4-H6 are;
-redneck shoot-em-up of Michael
-nipples on the sherrif's daughter -> Shotgun stairway fight
-blonde half-sister of Jamie
-Michael killing homeless guy in the beginning of 5
-Paul Rudd being true to his skills, not funny
 
Last edited:
Halloween 1, 2, H20 were the only ones I acknowledge as well. Including Zombie's craptastic "films."

There was 1 moment in 5 that legit creeped me out though. When they were surrounded by like 7 Michael Myers all at once. That was crazy scary to me.

Then it was just a bunch of *****es playing a prank and I never got creeped out again till H20.

and even H20 irks me. With the stolen Beltrami score.

- Jow
 
Personally, I love Rob Zombie's version for many reasons. Obviously, not as much as the original, but it's good film on it's own and many people think Rob was just out to remake film. He was doing his vision of the character and how Michael would be in the real word. Rob stated he's not doing remakes anymore because fans are going to continue to b**** that it's too different or it's too much like it.
 
Rob Zombie's first Halloween movie was gold compared to his second attempt.
 
Marx said:
Rob Zombie's first Halloween movie was gold compared to his second attempt.
Click to expand...
I think his second film was decent, despite what people say. He tried to take it in a different direction. The atmosphere in his second Halloween film was birlliant in terms of autumn and Halloween. It defenitely was'nt on par with his remake, but it was still decent, IMO.
 
Speaking without all of the other "bad" things of RZ's Halloween, the worst and downright pathetic part of it all is his Loomis. I love Malcolm McDowell but him and RZ really **** the bed with that character. He was a ******* *****e, who didn't give one care to "help" Michael. No passion other than "selling books". He was a media ****e. And, he had the same stern tone for all his lines. All I could picture was Loomis wanting to mess with Ari Gold the whole time. He basically was Tim Burton's Commissioner Gordon...
 
^^ Well, that was Rob's version of the character. He took it in his own direction and I didn't mind it tbh. I liked how, in the second film, Linda's father confornts Loomis.

Don't forget, guys, Rob was pushed around by the company on the set of the second film and he was quoted as saying it was a horrible experience, if I remember correctly.
 
Spider-ManHero12 said:
^^ Well, that was Rob's version of the character. He took it in his own direction and I didn't mind it tbh. I liked how, in the second film, Linda's father confornts Loomis.

Don't forget, guys, Rob was pushed around by the company on the set of the second film and he was quoted as saying it was a horrible experience, if I remember correctly.
Click to expand...

I don't like directors coming out after the fact and blaming the studio. Him, Raimi, etc. need to either stick to their cards or jump ship if they are not happy, not release an inferior version of the product for a paycheck and then say "sorry, not my fault" when people hate it.
 
antsman41 said:
I don't like directors coming out after the fact and blaming the studio. Him, Raimi, etc. need to either stick to their cards or jump ship if they are not happy, not release an inferior version of the product for a paycheck.
Click to expand...
Maybe it's because they still have a drive to do it. Raimi walked out of S-M4 because the a-holes at the studio were trying to tell him what to do. Rob's new film (Lords Of Salem) won't have studio's pushing him around, se he'll be free to do what he wants. You don't see guys like Spielberg, Lucas, Tarantino, Rodrigueze, etc, being pushed around often.
 
I admired Zombies fresh take on Halloween. He obviously was passionate about it and wanted to bring something new to the table. The first one was technically well made.

But humanizing Michael Myers is pretty much the worst thing you can do. He's better as a force of nature, well evil. Giving him a motive to become the monster is sorta defeating the object of Michael Myers. He is just "The Shape" afterall. Making him more human and relatable, just makes him less frightening.

Saying that, I hated him being Laurie's brother too. And Zombie obviously didn't introduce that part.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

T
  • Poll Poll
Scream 4!!!!! - Part 4
16 17 18
Replies
442
Views
38K
John Locke
John Locke
T
  • Locked
  • Poll Poll
Scream 4!!!!! - Part 4
39 40 41
Replies
1K
Views
73K
Thread Manager
T
T
  • Locked
  • Poll Poll
Scream 4!!!!! - Part 3
39 40 41
Replies
1K
Views
61K
Thread Manager
T
T
  • Locked
Interstellar - Part 4
39 40 41
Replies
1K
Views
38K
Thread Manager
T
T
  • Locked
Prometheus - Part 4
39 40 41
Replies
1K
Views
28K
Thread Manager
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Staff online

Members online

Total: 2,861 (members: 15, guests: 2,846)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,447
Messages
22,109,743
Members
45,902
Latest member
SilverHawk7

Share this page

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"