!Superman!
Civilian
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2012
- Messages
- 307
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
she doesnt have any make up on...just google her guys... she is hot!

Ya know, maybe she can........... act?
![]()
A WEE bit sexist when you say it in ranks of numbers, bro. Not cool.![]()
but why would a " glamorous model" hook up with this Peter? in the animated series Peter looked strong and like " a model" so to speak. Andrew Garfield looks like a school kid. This isn't Transformers where Super woman Megan Fox hooks up with a tool like Shia LaOPTIMUUUUUUUS.
Please go read some comics and not rely and a poor cartoon for your characterization.
Garfield is a good looking guy, even for the for a "nerd type" that people see Peter as.
MJ is supposed to be the most wanted girl in school, everyone wants her, this chick looks like your average girl, nothing special really jumps out about her.
"some comics"
there are so many different comic versions of spiderman and mary jane that i dont have any problem with Mark Webb casting a beautiful girl like Shailene Woodley.
It was his choice. He has a vision for this movie. People here just wanted a pin up girl Mary Jane Style to jer*off to.
and its not a poor cartoon^^
well but Gwen Stacy didnt look like the comic version either and she was great. Peter was pretty spot on. thin guy. Better than the Toby M. Spiderman. It wont chance now, she is MJ let`s see what she can do.
well but Gwen Stacy didnt look like the comic version either and she was great. Peter was pretty spot on. thin guy. Better than the Toby M. Spiderman. It wont chance now, she is MJ let`s see what she can do.
well but Gwen Stacy didnt look like the comic version either and she was great. Peter was pretty spot on. thin guy. Better than the Toby M. Spiderman. It wont chance now, she is MJ let`s see what she can do.
They should have just given Emma Stone a red wig and let her play Gwen and MJ. Emma would have been a fantasic MJ, I dare say her MJ would probably best her Gwen as I think her natural energy (like Zombieland) is muted as she is playing a more subdued Gwen rather than a party girl like MJ.
why should they fire the person? it worked with the first movie. Now everybody knows Garfield and Stone even more . So whats the problem with an unknown face like Woodley? If the movie is good people will hear about it and watch it. It`s still Spiderman so people will go no matter what.
but people here wanna see a "glamorous Model" as MJ. Stone is not a glamorous model but i agree with you. She would be great as MJ.
To me Emma Stone did not look completely accurate for Gwen Stacy. Gwen is supposed to look like a young goddess beauty queen with an amazing figure. Emma just looked cute. One good thing about Emma is she had a big name in Hollywood before she was cast so more people will show up just to see her.
NO-ONE is going to show up to see Shailene. If they cast someone big at the moment that would work in their favour. If they cast Elena Satine she is an unknown but she looks like MJ stepped off the page. She is also a good actress. About as good as Shailene who herself is an unknown. Which is why yes, whoever cast her should be fired. She should be recast in the next one. This is a slap in the face to Stan Lee's vision. If they wanted ugly they should have featured Carlie Cooper or Deberah Whitman instead of Mary Jane. Everyone will end up hating MJ again like in Raimi's and I will never forgive Marc Webb or whoever for doing that.
![]()
Not glamorous?
MJ is a girl everybody in the school wants to be with and i think there would be more beautiful girls in a school next to Emma stone.MJ is supposed to be the most wanted girl in school, everyone wants her