Civil War Sharon carter A.K.A. Agent 13 - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
So it isn't at all a possibility?

It's always a possibility, but given what the Russos have said, it's unlikely. And until I see a source for it other than people who are mad about Sharon Carter, I'm not likely to believe it.
 
Iron Man & Spidey were always in the script

The Russos said they had no plan B for if they didn't get Spidey
 
Suit yourself. I think two movies completely coincidentally having a similar premise falling on the same day is much less likely than one movie being changed in reaction.
 
Is it so hard to believe they reduced Sharon Carter's role over what was originally intended?

These films tend to be light on sex and romance anyway.
 
4wHASiE.png


Wp7Ev7Q.png

"I was supposed to be a lead but they reduced my part to a cameo. Love 'em :yay:"

Kiss confirmed : "It's refreshing to see Captain in a more intimate situation."- @EmilyVanCamp speaking of her on screen kiss with Cap
 
Is it so hard to believe they reduced Sharon Carter's role over what was originally intended?

These films tend to be light on sex and romance anyway.

Aside from The Winter Soldier and arguably GotG, no, not really.

Her role's definitely been reduced, but when the she's mentioned in response to a question of how and what will be front and center, it is peculiar that she's gone from what sounded like a main supporting to slightly more than what she got last time.

So it would appear that not much thought was put into Sharon's "introduction" from the beginning.
 
"I was supposed to be a lead but they reduced my part to a cameo. Love 'em :yay:"

Well, who doesn't give a kind word about their boss, no matter what.

Not that the Russos have anything to say about her.
 
Last edited:
Because perhaps some people might want to discuss something about Sharon other than bashing other characters and coming up with conspiracy theories?
 
Why are you here?

Because we're allowed to visit threads in relation to characters in a movie we're looking forward to? Yet all that this thread consists of is whinging, moaning and conspiracy theories that are completely unfounded and ridiculous.
 
Because we're allowed to visit threads in relation to characters in a movie we're looking forward to? Yet all that this thread consists of is whinging, moaning and conspiracy theories that are completely unfounded and ridiculous.

It doesn't much sound like you think much will or should come of Sharon, nor that she is a part of the movie you're concerned with. So what are you looking for, exactly?
 
I mean, if anyone has something worthwhile to contribute, go ahead. It's just that a lot of posters on this thread appear to be here to defend the Russo' decision to underuse Sharon or to defend probably every character at the expense of Sharon.
 
I mean, if anyone has something worthwhile to contribute, go ahead. It's just that a lot of posters on this thread appear to be here to defend the Russo' decision to underuse Sharon or to defend probably every character at the expense of Sharon.

And vice versa. Also this isn't the Sharon appreciation thread, so not everyone who comes on this thread needs to be a Sharon fan.
 
So you don't need to like Sharon to post here but negative comment about any other character is character bashing and bad.
 
So you don't need to like Sharon to post here but any other character is character bashing.

No one is bashing Sharon. Saying her supposed reduced role isn't as big of a deal as some think it is =/= not bashing. I've seen Sharon bashing in other threads, which people are entitled to do, but I don't see them do it on this thread.
 
I'm glad there wasn't romance in WS. I don't think I would love it as much as I did. I'm also glad it doesn't look like CW will have much romance.
 
And I'm not bashing Scarlet Witch by saying I'm not interested her.

Also notice; me not prowling the Wanda thread.

But you would have every right to. And it would be wrong of someone to then say to you "why are you here?"
 
I love Sharon Carter, and I get that a lot of her fans are upset (I included) but nothing is going to change and the least we should be doing is fighting about it.

I'm upset because when EVC was cast, she was cast as the female lead of TWS. For whatever reason, the Russos upped Scarlett's role and made her the female lead.

On the path to Cap 3 the writers, Feige and I believe the Russos themselves talked about Sharon's role in the film and that she will have more of a presence. This is also evident by her being in all the concept art. However, it looks like she was replaced by Wanda in the airport fight and possibly some other scenes. We have yet to see EVC in the outfit from all the promo photos and that worries me. I really doubt they would release so much merchandise with her wearing an outfit she doesn't wear in the film though so that is keeping me optimistic she plays a role in the airport battle or the end battle.

It feels as if she's been replaced twice now by two different female characters - in TWS by BW and in CW by SW. I love all the characters but I wish Sharon had a meatier role in a CA film (which should be her time to shine). I'm sure I will be happy with whatever we get, I'm just hopeful it's good and she has a role in Infinity Wars.
 
It doesn't much sound like you think much will or should come of Sharon, nor that she is a part of the movie you're concerned with. So what are you looking for, exactly?

I've said nothing about any potential future of Sharon's character, so I have no idea where that accusation is coming from. I browse each character thread to see what's being discussed, to see any news, etc, such as the tweets posted earlier. Is that so wrong? No, it's not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,392
Messages
22,096,670
Members
45,894
Latest member
DooskiPack
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"