Bastila
Deathdealer
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2006
- Messages
- 9,926
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
DACrowe said:Ah, but they weren't afraid to show rear nudity or topless in Selene's case so it wasn't a lack of body parts and it had heavy foreshadowing in it. It just seemed like that and since when do vampires us protection? LOL! Plus as juvinile as Wiseman can be as a filmmaker he tended to avoid overly romantic/sexual cliches in the first one (except for a much needed to be deleted scene in the extended cut) and why else would he film a scene of his wife then?
they might have use protection, as the vamps in Underworld are different to other vampires films and books, for starters they can see themself in mirrors and have reflections unlike most, the holy cross thing doesn't work and garlic either, so there different vamps to others. But like i said earyer most films you see with a sex scean you don't see anyone using protection but they never get pregent or no one questions it, so why question it in this film?
And maybe they just wanted to make love like UMMan said. lol.