The Dark Knight SlashFilm recieved major spoilers! READ at OWN RISK.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noir
  • Start date Start date
no, he said that it's been unofficially confirmed (haha..i know) that nolan and the gang with be at wizard.
 
when you got latino review posting, and KNOWING/met the guy who posted it, then there's something there.

Jett also confirmed that the report is true. Was WBDEEPTHROAT right the whole time?..hmm
 
Didnt Jett also confirm that there would be no TDK at wizard world too...???

No. Jett is going to Wizard World. He's said all along that they would be at WW in Chicago. He did report the studios claim that they would not be a Comic Con, but that really wasn't his fault.
 
No. Jett is going to Wizard World. He's said all along that they would be at WW in Chicago. He did report the studios claim that they would not be a Comic Con, but that really wasn't his fault.

Someone posted a link where BOF confirmed no Batman at WW, plus the whole "scissor puppy" thing................:csad:
 
Jett also confirmed that the report is true.
based on what? oh, because he says so. so much for that spoiler policy, eh jett-"oh, i knew that stuff all along"-man?

seems to fly in the face of Miranda's report who has said that no major character dies. color me skeptical.
 
He did report the studios claim that they would not be a Comic Con, but that really wasn't his fault.
but it hardly portrays him as the insider he purports to be, doesn't it?

"there will be NO, NADA, NIET TDK presence at SDCC"

 
I dont want this to turn into another BOF and Jett debate, b/c it always ends in bloodshed, but I need to hear or read from something other than BOF and Latino Reveiw
 
Well it could explain the two suits. /FILM is stating there is two batmans. What if the old suit is stolen, worn by none other then AMH.

Then Batman has a new suit. It would be easy to decipher between the two in the movie. Since those sources whether they are believable or not stipulate the Joker catches batman standing beside Bruce Wayne.

personally I find it highly unlikely, but Nolan has as many twists as this movie seems to be motivating.

It's a 200.000.000 dollar secret. ( 2 for two batmans,) Everything is a joke...(sigh)

Guess I'll wait to see the damn thing.
 
So how spoilerish are these details? Scale from 1-10.
 
I think we won't get the pleasure Rachel dying. I think Nolan doesn't kill women by men.
 
I don't even think thats a very big spoiler.

And I don't think it's 100% true either.

Am I supposed to believe that Jett (who has been keeping his mouth shut) has confirmed this?
 
That's not so big, people have been gunning for Joker to butcher Rachel for years.
 
I think we won't get the pleasure Rachel dying. I think Nolan doesn't kill women by men.

Watch the Prestige(lady drowns in a magic act), and Chill did shoot Bruce's Mom.............you know what, nvrmind, your right..............:csad:
 
Watch the Prestige(lady drowns in a magic act), and Chill did shoot Bruce's Mom.............you know what, nvrmind, your right..............:csad:

Hmm...right. :whatever: But she won't die. Because then we lose the women quote in the movie. I think there's a law that at least 5% of the cast have to be women... :woot:
 
Hmm...right. :whatever: But she won't die. Because then we lose the women quote in the movie. I think there's a law that at least 5% of the cast have to be women... :woot:

I think they would just look the other way and just let that one slip by in this case.
 
Or they change the role to a hot looking... female news reporter... blond hair, big breasts and willing to have sex with Bruce Wayne
 
Watch the Prestige(lady drowns in a magic act), and Chill did shoot Bruce's Mom.............you know what, nvrmind, your right..............:csad:
i think he was talking about murder, and the Prestige wasn't a case of murder. Joe Chill, however, obviously was.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"