The Dark Knight SlashFilm recieved major spoilers! READ at OWN RISK.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noir
  • Start date Start date
Yes, c'mon Jow, Discredit LR............c'mon...........please.........tell us its not true:confused:



This may sound like an excuse, and I'm sure that's what he'll say, but Idc. I really don't f'n feel like it. I'm sick of all this mysterio BS. Idk how many times I have to nail scoops before the guy believes me. Someone has an ego bigger than me, congrats mysterio.

I know it's just one poster, but it's really bothering me.

So I don't feel like being criticized today. It's been a tough week personally for me, and some Bat-news hits and the naysayer strikes. Some good stuff is sour for me now and so I'm gonna head out and let off some steam because the 4 year old mysterio has to be a *****e.

- Jow
 
Idk how many times I have to nail scoops before the guy believes me.
you haven't nailed anything until it turns out to be true. and should someone die, you've left it vague enough that should ANY character die, you, like jett, will be able to come back with "i told you so!"
 
This may sound like an excuse, and I'm sure that's what he'll say, but Idc. I really don't f'n feel like it. I'm sick of all this mysterio BS. Idk how many times I have to nail scoops before the guy believes me. Someone has an ego bigger than me, congrats mysterio.

I know it's just one poster, but it's really bothering me.

So I don't feel like being criticized today. It's been a tough week personally for me, and some Bat-news hits and the naysayer strikes. Some good stuff is sour for me now and so I'm gonna head out and let off some steam because the 4 year old mysterio has to be a *****e.

- Jow
So then LR was true????????? I really hope its not so do your scooper thing.............c'mon........something.........:csad:
 
Is do we know more about this Slashfilm/LR stuff? Is it true?

Is there really gonna be fake Bats and all of that?
 
Is do we know more about this Slashfilm/LR stuff? Is it true?
both LR and BOF are doing the backpedal two-step. the "news" items have been deleted and discussion threads are being deleted and prohibited. pretty rich.

SHH is where it's at.
 
Did Jett post it was 100% legit, then deleted everything, or was there another post in between that saying it was iffy? Not that it really matters
 
Did Jett post it was 100% legit, then deleted everything, or was there another post in between that saying it was iffy? Not that it really matters
yes.

LMFAO!!!! now jett has shut down his forums. you just can't make this stuff up.
 
Well, if Jett shut his forums down, the report was true.

And to me, that's good news - should make for some tense moments near the end of the film, more than BB's ending anyway.
 
Well, if Jett shut his forums down, the report was true.

And to me, that's good news - should make for some tense moments near the end of the film, more than BB's ending anyway.
nah. he started off saying the report is 100% true. then he backpedaled and said, "well i'm not saying the report is true, but i know such and such, and i believe him." then he backpedaled further and said, "so and so says it's bs, and i believe him. i will now delete this thread and anyone who tries to start another thread about this topic."

the locked down forum is his retreating back behind the green curtain.
 
nah. he started off saying the report is 100% true. then he backpedaled and said, "well i'm not saying the report is true, but i know such and such, and i believe him." then he backpedaled further and said, "so and so says it's bs, and i believe him. i will now delete this thread and anyone who tries to start another thread about this topic."

the locked down forum is his retreating back behind the green curtain.

Well, then based on that, this is probably a half and half report. Half true, Half B.S.

Congrats Jett for once again coming across as if you have connections or know anybody....
 
Really hope the whole

Rachelle Dawes being killed by the Joker

Is true, it would really set him apart from other comic villains

who only threaten, yet never follow through, with killing the hero's love interest
 
Really hope the whole

Rachelle Dawes being killed by the Joker

Is true, it would really set him apart from other comic villains

who only threaten, yet never follow through, with killing the hero's love interest


Totally agree, it definately would set him apart and would truly make him a psychopath
 
haha, 'membership by approval'

what bollocks
 
IMO, if the Joker WAS to kill Dawes...then showing a picture of Joker with a knife up against her cheek a year before the film comes out...would be terrible marketing? surely?

That's the main reason I think it's b.s.
 
Can I just chime in and say that if all those spoilers that LR offered are true

I am 100% absolutely content with everyone of them
- The big one, Joker killing Rachel. This the extreme side of Joker we all want to see and I think her death will have a greater impact on us with Maggie in the role - we would have cheered in the theater had it been Katie

- Relieved the Batpod does not "eject" from the Tumbler. That sounded ******ed.

- Very happy that Two Face's appearance is only a brief cameo likely to stir some sequel interest. That's what I figured it would be anyway, but this should at least shut up the "THERE'S TOO MANY VILLIANS!" whiners.
 
I don't think Joker killing Dawes would be a terrible idea. I just don't think he will. It's too obvious.

Fox...is a whole different ball game.
 
IMO, if the Joker WAS to kill Dawes...then showing a picture of Joker with a knife up against her cheek a year before the film comes out...would be terrible marketing? surely?

That's the main reason I think it's b.s.

Good point. The picture of the Joker and Rachael suggests that he's going to kill her or it could be used as a device to distract us from knowing who actually gets killed.

The latter seems to be the most logical.
 
I don't think Joker killing Dawes would be a terrible idea. I just don't think he will. It's too obvious.

Fox...is a whole different ball game.


Sorry, but you can't kill Morgan Freeman, he's too powerful

The spoiler report which is looking to be pretty credible pretty much said it would be Dawes. AND - I think the mob taking things too far conversation in the teaser may have to do with her murder.

Honestly, I don't think you can kill Fox so early in Batman's career. And the entire concept of killing Alfred or Gordon is insane.
 
No, the Joker kills him. Think about it- no one would think or even consider it! The Joker kills Alfred! :(

BTW, not being serious.
 
Don't really understand the hostility toward these rumors from some of you. They all make quite a bit of sense given what we already know.
I don't quite get why people are up in arms over the Joker learning Bruce's identity. The person made it quite clear that by the end of the movie he would no longer believe Bruce Wayne is Batman. It's a common storyline that has appeared several times in the comic. As long as by the end of the film the Joker doesn't know for certain Bruce is Batman then all is well.

As for Rachel dying... I'm conflicted, but only because I like Maggie Gylennhaul. Personally, back when Katie was still Rachel, I was secretly hoping for this exact outcome. It's not something that I feel is necessary, but if it works within the context of the plot, more power to them for having the balls to do it.
 
I don't think Joker killing Dawes would be a terrible idea. I just don't think he will. It's too obvious.

Fox...is a whole different ball game.

not really, especially to regular (not hardcore fans) audience that is...

people usually have that notion that the hero will always save the day especially a damsel in distress...

killing off Rachel would be breaking that convention...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"