A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
Such a shame to abandon that awesome new cast. I will believe this new movie happens when I see it.
The same article says that a fourth and final film with that cast is still in active development as well. Granted, there's zero guarantee that it will happen after so many abandoned attempts, but they're still trying to make it and the fact that it is reported to be the last one makes me think they are probably a bit more serious and certain about this than before.Will believe it when I see it at this point but clearly Paramount has been forced to abandon the Abrams cast sequel. It's just not happening right now. Paramount screwed that up at every angle.
I'm really confused why they made all those announcements and failed to deliver on every single one. This all fell apart post-Beyond because they didn't want to pay some of the cast members what they already agreed to. And then they announced the sequel again when none of the cast members were signed to new deals, which was a huge gamble that didn't pay off at all.
Now, what it means to abandon the Abrams cast at least means they can start fresh with a new cast and they'd be a lot cheaper to start out.
I'm still disappointed with the Abrams films. They successfully relaunched the franchise and were riding tons of momentum and goodwill. Then they totally squandered it.
Then they had the 50th anniversary for Beyond and they did nothing to capitalize on it at all. The marketing for Beyond was awful. Absolutely awful.
Really does feel like Star Trek’s answer to the Batman drought between 1997-2005.How many times have we had an announcement of a new Kelvin-timeline Star Trek movie since Beyond?
How many times have we had an announcement of a new Kelvin-timeline Star Trek movie since Beyond?