I've dropped a few cast reviews, but here's my movie one.
It was a really fun film to watch. Going into it, I wasn't expecting much with Gunn saying that he didn't "get" the character, so I remained skeptical, but open-minded.
I didn't care if he said that or not, at least he was honest about his insecurities with the character.
I will watch it a second time because I feel like I just want to enjoy myself at the movies like I used to, which I did here.
I'm not a huge fan of making Superman serious. That being said, he
was serious in this, but not over the top. He lements, but that's what makes him relatable, he's raised around the human race, so he has adapted their ways and traits.
The other films, minus
Smallville's take on Clark Kent's persona, don't capture this well. They've made him stiff, overtly stoic, and a cardboard cutout.
I'm not big on Superman being dark because he isn't a dark character. He's meant to be a beacon of hope and light for doing and being good to humanity. The movie gave me that. I appreciate seeing
color, too. Finally, Superman has color again. Of course, being a dog person, Krypto.
Are those lore problems? Yes. Are there campy scenes that made me laugh? Yeah, that's Gunn, too, those are overlooked.
Was there good vs. evil? Yes. Did Superman use his powers to save everyday people and animals? Absolutely. Was David Corenswet perfectly cast? I would say so.
So many moments in the movie made me scream out,
"That's Superman." Not many versions have done that.
They pinned the essence of the character down that the other films never did. They brought out Superman's humanity. He felt real, that's what I connected with. I'm curious where they're going to take the character from here.
They can go anywhere with the future stories. The tone was correct. We're getting away from what doesn't work. So many past versions have turned me off to caring about the character, but now, like the fundamental essence of who Superman truly is, I have hope again. That's what he represents.