The reviews suggest AXM isn't exactly a masterpiece either.
Um.. AXM seems to have won over the reviews and awards that matter in the industry - and certainly the sales - so just what in the world are you talking about?
So apparently Eisner awards for best continuing series, best inker, among others, just don't matter? I assume Wizard Fan awards also don't matter... Niether do the bags and boards awards... or Eagle awards, right?

... I mean I guess being the most nominated book in the last 10 years in the comic industry shouldn't count for anything... right?
And also the positive reviews from AICN, ROLLING STONE, IGN, ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY, and LOTS of others should just be ignored.
If you think us fan boys *****ing about not hitting deadlines and lack of continuity somehow equals poor critical reception - then it certainly isn't showing in the fan awards or the sales.
I honestly have no idea what you were getting at in your posts... if you don't like AXM that is one thing but to say it is performing poorly when no evidence supports it is a totally differnet thing.
Lots of us are pissed about the delays and the lack of finding it's place in the world of continuity, but don't insult our intelligence to look up information that is available to everyone.