The Amazing Spider-Man 2 The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - Part 6

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nope, I'm serious. I don't want people to get ahead of themselves, and start naming battle scenes that might not happen.

ah k. well if it isn't an action scene it is a wasted opportunity.

if anything it will be a rather extensive scene given the amount of time and effort they are going to with the set and the one day of location filming.

plus, you shouldn't expect people to stop "getting ahead of themselves". speculation is what this thread is about, in between the news we get anyway.
 
yeah if its just some kind of expositional scene, they could just shoot that in the real times square...
 
You'd be wrong. Are you really incapable of realizing how ****ing stupid and contrived that scenario is? It's like a bad cover from Superman's Pal Jimmy Olsen. I hope you're not planning on a writing career when you grow up because holy ****.

You keep focusing on the conventions and cosplayers like it's a relevant point because you don't actually have one. The idea that buying a Spider-Man costume, in a world where there's a real guy running around like that on the news every day, would somehow automatically make a person jump to the immediate conclusion that you or someone you know must be Spider-Man? That makes sense to you? That there is really no other logical explanation like "Hey someone's going to a costume party?" You think it's a reasonable deduction that every time someone buys a red nose and clown shoes that they must be Bozo?

Pure contrariness, like I said. Because the alternative is that you really are as dim as you sometimes come across, and I don't believe that to be the case. So do yourself and everyone else a favor and stop trolling all the damn time. It's freaking tedious and makes you look bad.

Agreed.

I gotta say...I'm kinda with Anno on this one. At the very least, I see his point, and even if I didn't I'd find your post unnecessarily hostile.

You're point about some one spazzing out over the purchase of a clown costume doesn't really work, as clowns are an everyday, common thing, where as Spider-Man is not.

It really isn't that far fetched for someone to be suspicious when if Peter or Gwen came in asking for them to tailor a Spider-Man suit, because Spider-Man is NOT the "clown" or film character, or what have you that no one would bat an eye about. Sure, Peter or Gwen could brush it off as a costume for a party or whatever, but why in the blue hell would they risk something like that? ESPECIALLY when the tailor could see THEIR new costume being used by Spider-Man in the news as soon as it was picked up.

The costume party excuse could work and the tailor wouldn't need to ask in the first place because it's not uncommon for a person to wear a costume of a superhero like figure in real life but the underlined part would definitely be possible.
 
i think he was being sarcastic (on account of the smilie)

Nope, I'm serious. I don't want people to get ahead of themselves, and start naming battle scenes that might not happen.

ah k. well if it isn't an action scene it is a wasted opportunity.

if anything it will be a rather extensive scene given the amount of time and effort they are going to with the set and the one day of location filming.

plus, you shouldn't expect people to stop "getting ahead of themselves". speculation is what this thread is about, in between the news we get anyway.

yeah if its just some kind of expositional scene, they could just shoot that in the real times square...

All this for a none action scene?

50+ days on that Time Square set they're building...........

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=101496
 
Are we sure there's going to be a Times Square Battle simply based on a one day shoot and a Times Square model. Aren't you all setting yourselves up if it's just a simple scene that doesn't include a fight scene? :o

No chance they build such an extensive/expensive set for a simple scene. I think there's a good chance it'll be the big final fight to boot.
 
Has the suit got any more perfect since I've been away?
 
I think they will capture that one day from Times Square and use it later by CGI. That's the best idea for it to happen this way.

And lets not talk about Wesman. Might be a 14 year old kid or could be a grown man being an extreme fanboy. Either way he was a troll and he got what was coming. Can't wait for him to return after 2 weeks. He might have changed. :p :p
 
I understand chaseter why he didn't like the first one, he does have fair points. I did enjoy the first film myself, but I also want to see other's point of view on it. Just because I overlook most of the flaws cause I enjoyed it doesn't mean other's aren't allowed to criticize them
 
I understand chaseter why he didn't like the first one, he does have fair points. I did enjoy the first film myself, but I also want to see other's point of view on it. Just because I overlook most of the flaws cause I enjoyed it doesn't mean other's aren't allowed to criticize them

True...true
 
Sorry to go off this topic. BUT could Dillon be working at Ravencroft and something goes wrong in the voltage cells? It's a shot in the dark but its plausible
 
My first guest about the mimes thing would just be as background color for a scene in Central Park or something. Maybe some crooks robbing a bank?

That actually isn't a bad idea with the crooks. I mean look at "THE DARK KNIGHT" or "KICK ASS 2", here you have a hero on the scene cleaning up the scum of the city, and suddenly new costumed vigilantes (imitators) and costumed crooks show up. It would be like Toby Maguire's line from "SM 3" after facing off with Sandman, "Where do these guys come from?"

And like someone said... one of the crooks could be Quentin Beck if you do this or working for Quentin Beck. Again, Webb building the universe. :woot:
 
is it just me or is this costume have slightly different, but kinda similar material than the original TASM costume?

willsp.jpg


it doesn't look as rubbery, it has more of a raspy quality
 
I hope they find a new and interesting way of portraying the villain instead of always making them a father figure to Peter.
 
Are we sure there's going to be a Times Square Battle simply based on a one day shoot and a Times Square model. Aren't you all setting yourselves up if it's just a simple scene that doesn't include a fight scene? :o
They're shooting at a fake Times Square set for 60 days iirc...only thing that takes that long are battle scenes.
 
Electro lighting up Times Square, bada$$.
 
They're shooting at a fake Times Square set for 60 days iirc...only thing that takes that long are battle scenes.
60 DAYS? Well, that's different, I thought it was for a one day shoot.

What we need is the Times Square model, the fake Times Square location pic and a pic of where/the exact angle where they are shooting from in Times Square. These eyes of mine want to match all three of them up together. :word:
 
You've been posting that face in every thread here.....

Spam much?

Edit: lol, spammer was silenced
 
Last edited:
ah k. well if it isn't an action scene it is a wasted opportunity.

if anything it will be a rather extensive scene given the amount of time and effort they are going to with the set and the one day of location filming.

plus, you shouldn't expect people to stop "getting ahead of themselves". speculation is what this thread is about, in between the news we get anyway.
We'll see, it looks like it may be so.

Can speculation and curiosity be friends?

If so, I wonder if Electro can fly in this film.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"