ThePowerCosmic
Hyped Up
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Messages
- 19,379
- Reaction score
- 984
- Points
- 73
Yeah, he's probably pretty mad about that.
Nope, I'm serious. I don't want people to get ahead of themselves, and start naming battle scenes that might not happen.i think he was being sarcastic (on account of the smilie)
Nope, I'm serious. I don't want people to get ahead of themselves, and start naming battle scenes that might not happen.
You'd be wrong. Are you really incapable of realizing how ****ing stupid and contrived that scenario is? It's like a bad cover from Superman's Pal Jimmy Olsen. I hope you're not planning on a writing career when you grow up because holy ****.
You keep focusing on the conventions and cosplayers like it's a relevant point because you don't actually have one. The idea that buying a Spider-Man costume, in a world where there's a real guy running around like that on the news every day, would somehow automatically make a person jump to the immediate conclusion that you or someone you know must be Spider-Man? That makes sense to you? That there is really no other logical explanation like "Hey someone's going to a costume party?" You think it's a reasonable deduction that every time someone buys a red nose and clown shoes that they must be Bozo?
Pure contrariness, like I said. Because the alternative is that you really are as dim as you sometimes come across, and I don't believe that to be the case. So do yourself and everyone else a favor and stop trolling all the damn time. It's freaking tedious and makes you look bad.
I gotta say...I'm kinda with Anno on this one. At the very least, I see his point, and even if I didn't I'd find your post unnecessarily hostile.
You're point about some one spazzing out over the purchase of a clown costume doesn't really work, as clowns are an everyday, common thing, where as Spider-Man is not.
It really isn't that far fetched for someone to be suspicious when if Peter or Gwen came in asking for them to tailor a Spider-Man suit, because Spider-Man is NOT the "clown" or film character, or what have you that no one would bat an eye about. Sure, Peter or Gwen could brush it off as a costume for a party or whatever, but why in the blue hell would they risk something like that? ESPECIALLY when the tailor could see THEIR new costume being used by Spider-Man in the news as soon as it was picked up.
i think he was being sarcastic (on account of the smilie)
Nope, I'm serious. I don't want people to get ahead of themselves, and start naming battle scenes that might not happen.
ah k. well if it isn't an action scene it is a wasted opportunity.
if anything it will be a rather extensive scene given the amount of time and effort they are going to with the set and the one day of location filming.
plus, you shouldn't expect people to stop "getting ahead of themselves". speculation is what this thread is about, in between the news we get anyway.
yeah if its just some kind of expositional scene, they could just shoot that in the real times square...
Are we sure there's going to be a Times Square Battle simply based on a one day shoot and a Times Square model. Aren't you all setting yourselves up if it's just a simple scene that doesn't include a fight scene?![]()
Has the suit got any more perfect since I've been away?


I understand chaseter why he didn't like the first one, he does have fair points. I did enjoy the first film myself, but I also want to see other's point of view on it. Just because I overlook most of the flaws cause I enjoyed it doesn't mean other's aren't allowed to criticize them
My first guest about the mimes thing would just be as background color for a scene in Central Park or something. Maybe some crooks robbing a bank?
t:
They're shooting at a fake Times Square set for 60 days iirc...only thing that takes that long are battle scenes.Are we sure there's going to be a Times Square Battle simply based on a one day shoot and a Times Square model. Aren't you all setting yourselves up if it's just a simple scene that doesn't include a fight scene?![]()
sunscreen doesn't help once you get burned, it is a preventative measure only.
edit: ha, and i think you realised that and edited accordingly

60 DAYS? Well, that's different, I thought it was for a one day shoot.They're shooting at a fake Times Square set for 60 days iirc...only thing that takes that long are battle scenes.

We'll see, it looks like it may be so.ah k. well if it isn't an action scene it is a wasted opportunity.
if anything it will be a rather extensive scene given the amount of time and effort they are going to with the set and the one day of location filming.
plus, you shouldn't expect people to stop "getting ahead of themselves". speculation is what this thread is about, in between the news we get anyway.