Garfield's Peter is the worst iteration of Spider-man I've ever seen so I agree wholeheartedly, but what is the bolded referring to? It's been a minute since I watched ASM 2 in it's entirety.
Garfield's Peter is the worst iteration of Spider-man I've ever seen so I agree wholeheartedly, but what is the bolded referring to? It's been a minute since I watched ASM 2 in it's entirety.
I can think of several better reasons to hate Garfield's Spider-man other than that, but that moment is pretty indicative of the half-baked, scattershot writing in ASM 2.
The level of discussion/hate the last couple pages over such an insignificant scene as Peter crossing the street is kind of embarrassing. Guys. It's not character assassination in the vein of Dr Doom in the FF movies. I mean, hell, one simply has to read Amazing Fantasy #15 to see that Parker can get lost in thought to the point of walking without noticing oncoming vehicles.
I rather focus on the poor structure and the overbaked ideas before I waste my breath on something as minor as that.
I would like to thank Sony, Marc Webb and Andrew Garfield for making one of the worst superhero films of all time. Without this, Homecoming wouldn't have happened. Thanks guys!
At first I was like , then I opened the scene on youtube to go WHOA, I never noticed this before.Nah that was dumb and out of character to walk into oncoming traffic. He even broke some guys mirror. The guy wasn't likable.
The thing is this: I don't find Andrew Garfield's Peter Parker to be endearing, charming, or remotely likable in the slightest. Throughout the entirety of the first TASM, I thought that Peter Parker was a disrespectful and entitled punk to everyone. And that carried over onto the sequel, too.
Peter wasn't lost in his thoughts. He was lucid and aware. Hence why he extended his hand to signal an oncoming car to let him pass through the middle of a crowded street white the traffic was moving. It was an exercise in pure vanity.
In your above example, Peter was saving people from a villain. Not crossing the street and trying to show off for his girlfriend. One act is an attempt to be heroic. The other act is just to elevate his own ego. That is not heroic.
The thing is this: I don't find Andrew Garfield's Peter Parker to be endearing, charming, or remotely likable in the slightest. Throughout the entirety of the first TASM, I thought that Peter Parker was a disrespectful and entitled punk to everyone. And that carried over onto the sequel, too.
So, when you have a moment in TASM2, when he walks into oncoming traffic without a care in the world, it's hard for me to not think he's being a jerk there, too. If he had awkwardly walked into traffic because of being so enamored with Gwen and then said a quick and sheepish "sorry!" to some of the drivers, that would have been okay.
Also that "I'm the luckiest guy in the world" moment in the comics was adorable. Why? Because Peter Parker was an established character who was a good spirited person who was getting over some really bad luck. Plus, he responded to a random, stereotypically outspoken NYC person who was telling him to shut up first. It was an "I don't care about your negativity! I'm so happy!" moment. Not being a jerk at all, if you ask me.
In your above example, Peter was saving people from a villain. Not crossing the street and trying to show off for his girlfriend. One act is an attempt to be heroic. The other act is just to elevate his own ego. That is not heroic.
Ok. You kind of missed my point, but made my point as well. The example I gave with Styx, I wasn't saying I myself think Spider-Man was a jerk. My actual opinion of those panels, I think it was just a comic relief action panel. My point was that if I wanted to, I could twist that all to show off how much of a jerk he was by pure mental aerobics.
Yet you make my point by saying "crossing the street trying to show off for his girlfriend". That is also a bit of mental aerobics because that's not what the scene was trying to depict. If he came up to Gwen and said, "Hey did you see what I just did, pretty cool huh?" then yes that is solid evidence he was trying to show off. But thats not what happened. That scene if anything, was trying to show, hey look at these two kids who are so in love. Once they looked at each other they just locked in and it was as if nothing was inbetween them. Even Gwen didn't notice that he caused all that traffic commotion. It's a lame scene. I even said I think the scene is whatever. But c'mon, "he's such a jerk look at him holding up traffic". I just think you guys are getting too triggered about the scene for the wrong reasons.