The Amazing Spider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man: Box Office Thread - Part 1

[©KAW]

Damn, y'all sure like numbers...

 

[Donald Thomas]

Sorry, but you two couldn't be more wrong. The Amazing Spider-Man, very much like Batman Begins back in 2005, it's a reboot of a superhero franchise. And as a reboot of a superhero franchise, it's set to become the highest grossing reboot of all time.

Let's take a look at the numbers.

1. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012): $614,611,425 WW (3rd weekend)
2. Iron Man 2 (2010): $623,933,331 WW
3. Iron Man (2008): $585,174,222 WW
4. Thor (2011): $449,326,618
5. Captain America: First Avenger (2011): $368,608,363
6. The Incredible Hulk (2008): $263,427,551

So taking in context with his fellow Marvel Films, The Amazing Spider-Man is bound to keep the crown as the highest grossing solo Marvel superhero. The only Marvel property based on Marvel characters that made more than any other Spider-Man film is The Avengers, which is an assemble never done before kind of superhero film.

Now if we look to the other reboots:

1. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012): Domestic $228,611,425 + Foreign $386,000,000 = $614,611,425 WW (3rd weekend)
2. Star Trek (2009): Domestic $257,730,019 + Foreign $127,950,427 = $385,680,446 WW
3. Batman Begins (2005): Domestic $205,343,774 + Foreign $167,366,241 = $372,710,015 WW
4. Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011): Domestic $176,760,185 + Foreign $305,040,68 = $481,800,873 WW
5. Cassino Royale (2006): Domestic $167,445,960 + Foreign $426,793,106 = $594,239,066 WW
6. X-Men First Class = Domestic $146,408,305 + Foreign $207,215,819 = $353,624,124

Even though the foreign grosses counting isn't how Bruce Malone quoted from an article some pages ago, The Amazing Spider-Man still comes up on the road of becoming the highest grossing reboot of all time, topping Star Trek in domestic grossings and with a far more profitable foreign grossing.

So let's see:

Still biggest solo superhero Marvel solo franchise: Check
Biggest box office reboot of all time: Check
Successfully making a reboot that pleases new and old fans: Check

Unlike you two have posted, neither Iron Man 1 and 2 were bigger successes than The Amazing Spider-Man or the purpose of a reboot is to make more than its previous film. The purpose of a reboot is to get a franchise back in a position of being profitable again. The Amazing Spider-Man achieves that in spades, and it has still a shot of topping Spider-Man 2 WW grosses, which is $783,766,341. And even if doesn't top that, I have a feeling that just like Batman Begins compared to TDK, the sequel will benefit from a huge jump in the grosses. So yeah, my point is that Sony not only managed to make the second best superhero film of the year and best Spider-Man film yet, The Amazing Spider-Man is a winner.

And I pity those who rooted against it. The Dark Knight Rises seems that will have FAR MORE problems to break even without blu-ray sales than The Amazing Spider-Man ever will.



It has been an incredible summer for superhero movies indeed, and like you I'll be purchasing the blu ray releases of all of them. With that said, I can't deny how disappointed I am with TDKR. For all the talk of Best Picture nominations, I was ready to see The Amazing Spider-Man as 3rd and The Avengers as 2nd best superhero film of the year. Instead I'm rating them like this:

1. The Avengers 10/10
2. The Amazing Spider-Man 9.5/10
3. The Dark Knight Rises 4/10

I'm still thankful to Nolan for two of the best Batman films ever though.

Aloha,
I like your thinking.
Spidey rules

 

[SLYspyder]

Sorry, but you two couldn't be more wrong. The Amazing Spider-Man, very much like Batman Begins back in 2005, it's a reboot of a superhero franchise. And as a reboot of a superhero franchise, it's set to become the highest grossing reboot of all time.

Let's take a look at the numbers.

1. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012): $614,611,425 WW (3rd weekend)
2. Iron Man 2 (2010): $623,933,331 WW
3. Iron Man (2008): $585,174,222 WW
4. Thor (2011): $449,326,618
5. Captain America: First Avenger (2011): $368,608,363
6. The Incredible Hulk (2008): $263,427,551

So taking in context with his fellow Marvel Films, The Amazing Spider-Man is bound to keep the crown as the highest grossing solo Marvel superhero. The only Marvel property based on Marvel characters that made more than any other Spider-Man film is The Avengers, which is an assemble never done before kind of superhero film.

Now if we look to the other reboots:

1. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012): Domestic $228,611,425 + Foreign $386,000,000 = $614,611,425 WW (3rd weekend)
2. Star Trek (2009): Domestic $257,730,019 + Foreign $127,950,427 = $385,680,446 WW
3. Batman Begins (2005): Domestic $205,343,774 + Foreign $167,366,241 = $372,710,015 WW
4. Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011): Domestic $176,760,185 + Foreign $305,040,68 = $481,800,873 WW
5. Cassino Royale (2006): Domestic $167,445,960 + Foreign $426,793,106 = $594,239,066 WW
6. X-Men First Class = Domestic $146,408,305 + Foreign $207,215,819 = $353,624,124

Even though the foreign grosses counting isn't how Bruce Malone quoted from an article some pages ago, The Amazing Spider-Man still comes up on the road of becoming the highest grossing reboot of all time, topping Star Trek in domestic grossings and with a far more profitable foreign grossing.

So let's see:

Still biggest solo superhero Marvel solo franchise: Check
Biggest box office reboot of all time: Check
Successfully making a reboot that pleases new and old fans: Check

Unlike you two have posted, neither Iron Man 1 and 2 were bigger successes than The Amazing Spider-Man or the purpose of a reboot is to make more than its previous film. The purpose of a reboot is to get a franchise back in a position of being profitable again. The Amazing Spider-Man achieves that in spades, and it has still a shot of topping Spider-Man 2 WW grosses, which is $783,766,341. And even if doesn't top that, I have a feeling that just like Batman Begins compared to TDK, the sequel will benefit from a huge jump in the grosses. So yeah, my point is that Sony not only managed to make the second best superhero film of the year and best Spider-Man film yet, The Amazing Spider-Man is a winner.

And I pity those who rooted against it. The Dark Knight Rises seems that will have FAR MORE problems to break even without blu-ray sales than The Amazing Spider-Man ever will.



It has been an incredible summer for superhero movies indeed, and like you I'll be purchasing the blu ray releases of all of them. With that said, I can't deny how disappointed I am with TDKR. For all the talk of Best Picture nominations, I was ready to see The Amazing Spider-Man as 3rd and The Avengers as 2nd best superhero film of the year.

I'm still thankful to Nolan for two of the best Batman films ever though.

Well said!

 

[Jexx]

Err.. Pedro, I don't mind you disliking TDKR, but it got 160 mil opening weekend, I don't see how it'll have problems breaking even.

 

[Venom'sDad]

Those are great numbers 3 weeks in....hope it sustaining power.

 

[Pedro Parque]

Aloha,
I like your thinking.
Spidey rules

You're welcome.

Well said!

Thank you!

Err.. Pedro, I don't mind you disliking TDKR, but it got 160 mil opening weekend, I don't see how it'll have problems breaking even.

I don't mean to derail the thread, but it's quite simple, actually. Regardless if it's impossible to gauge how much money Warner lost from the shooting that generated a bad buzz fog surrounding the film, the people that lost their lives are far more important than any other film or all films combined.

However, TDKR still has a reported $250m budget and an insanely huge marketing campaign costs that got literally take down with recent events. The opening is huge, indeed, but the Monday drop certainly isn't pleasing Warner, since it's making less domestically than TDK at the same point. I also think it's fair to say that the first batch of foreign releases fell short of what Warner was expecting, so I think it's fair to say that the chances of both TDKR and TASM not making their money back from the box office alone are slim, but TDKR is in a far more delicate position than TASM ever was.

Remember, TASM has a $230m budget and it was promoted heavily, but by no means the same kind of over the top worldwide promotion that The Avengers and TDKR prior to the Colorado shooting were going for. TDKR was supposed to be a record breaker and it turns out that it's possible that it won't even cross $1 biliion dollars worldwide, and that's probably a huge problem for them. TASM never aimed that high.

I'm just saying that it's ironic, after lurking the boards and seeing so many people talking about how TASM wouldn't make its money back, it's TDKR now that it's in a complicated situation. If anything, The Amazing Spider-Man is having the most stellar run that any reboot ever did, while TDKR is struggling to keep in pace with TDK. This is not gloating by any means, but people calling out this film box office grossing without any sense of rational thinking got to stop. Both TA and TASM did what they were aiming for, I just hope that TDKR will have legs enough to cross $400m domestically and guarantee a well made reboot.

 

[Superhero 101]

Haha Amazing Spiderman WW numbers are 616 million

 

[TheLastBlade]

Haha Amazing Spiderman WW numbers are 616 million

Which means that it made back it's domestic budget. But barely.

 

[Anno_Domini]

Sorry, but you two couldn't be more wrong. The Amazing Spider-Man, very much like Batman Begins back in 2005, it's a reboot of a superhero franchise. And as a reboot of a superhero franchise, it's set to become the highest grossing reboot of all time.

Let's take a look at the numbers.

1. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012): $614,611,425 WW (3rd weekend)
2. Iron Man 2 (2010): $623,933,331 WW
3. Iron Man (2008): $585,174,222 WW
4. Thor (2011): $449,326,618
5. Captain America: First Avenger (2011): $368,608,363
6. The Incredible Hulk (2008): $263,427,551

So taking in context with his fellow Marvel Films, The Amazing Spider-Man is bound to keep the crown as the highest grossing solo Marvel superhero. The only Marvel property based on Marvel characters that made more than any other Spider-Man film is The Avengers, which is an assemble never done before kind of superhero film.

Now if we look to the other reboots:

1. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012): Domestic $228,611,425 + Foreign $386,000,000 = $614,611,425 WW (3rd weekend)
2. Star Trek (2009): Domestic $257,730,019 + Foreign $127,950,427 = $385,680,446 WW
3. Batman Begins (2005): Domestic $205,343,774 + Foreign $167,366,241 = $372,710,015 WW
4. Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011): Domestic $176,760,185 + Foreign $305,040,68 = $481,800,873 WW
5. Cassino Royale (2006): Domestic $167,445,960 + Foreign $426,793,106 = $594,239,066 WW
6. X-Men First Class = Domestic $146,408,305 + Foreign $207,215,819 = $353,624,124

Even though the foreign grosses counting isn't how Bruce Malone quoted from an article some pages ago, The Amazing Spider-Man still comes up on the road of becoming the highest grossing reboot of all time, topping Star Trek in domestic grossings and with a far more profitable foreign grossing.

So let's see:

Still biggest solo superhero Marvel solo franchise: Check
Biggest box office reboot of all time: Check
Successfully making a reboot that pleases new and old fans: Check

Unlike you two have posted, neither Iron Man 1 and 2 were bigger successes than The Amazing Spider-Man or the purpose of a reboot is to make more than its previous film. The purpose of a reboot is to get a franchise back in a position of being profitable again. The Amazing Spider-Man achieves that in spades, and it has still a shot of topping Spider-Man 2 WW grosses, which is $783,766,341. And even if doesn't top that, I have a feeling that just like Batman Begins compared to TDK, the sequel will benefit from a huge jump in the grosses. So yeah, my point is that Sony not only managed to make the second best superhero film of the year and best Spider-Man film yet, The Amazing Spider-Man is a winner.

And I pity those who rooted against it. The Dark Knight Rises seems that will have FAR MORE problems to break even without blu-ray sales than The Amazing Spider-Man ever will.



It has been an incredible summer for superhero movies indeed, and like you I'll be purchasing the blu ray releases of all of them. With that said, I can't deny how disappointed I am with TDKR. For all the talk of Best Picture nominations, I was ready to see The Amazing Spider-Man as 3rd and The Avengers as 2nd best superhero film of the year. Instead I'm rating them like this:

1. The Avengers 10/10
2. The Amazing Spider-Man 9.5/10
3. The Dark Knight Rises 4/10

I'm still thankful to Nolan for two of the best Batman films ever though.

Well, I definitely enjoyed this post expect for the bold, haha. TDKR, to me, was the better of the three(with Avengers at 2 and TAS-M at 3) and TDKR SHOULD still be nominated for Best Film. It was that good.

 

[Anno_Domini]

Batman's done,there wont be a batman movie for another 10 years
As for Avengers,I dont think Avengers 2 will come out untill 2016

Err, ten years? Doubtful. Warner Brothers are already thinking about the reboot.

And isn't Avengers 2 coming out in 2015?

 

[Jexx]

Which means that it made back it's domestic budget. But barely.

I think he was alluding to the '616' part, which along with 666 is considered the number of the devil.

 

[Jexx]

Err, ten years? Doubtful. Warner Brothers are already thinking about the reboot.

And isn't Avengers 2 coming out in 2015?

Batman will probably be rebooted in 4-6 years, Avengers 2 is most likely coming out 2015.

2013: Iron Man 3, Thor: World of Darkness
2014: Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Guardians of the Galaxy
2015: Ant-Man, The Avengers 2

This is assuming that they want to go the 6 films in a phase route anyway.

 

[ShadowEdgeworth]

Which means that it made back it's domestic budget. But barely.

And at the sake of playing Captain Obvious, also means the universe in which the original Amazing Spider-Man is set. ^_^'

 

[Jick]

Which means that it made back it's domestic budget. But barely.

Well, it just made its budget in the States alone:
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=spiderman4.htm

Which means it earned 2 million yesterday, Monday. If it continues like that, then I predict it'll earn around 243 million by the end of Sunday.

 

[Supa]

I think he was alluding to the '616' part, which along with 666 is considered the number of the devil.

Maybe he was alluding to 616, which is the number for the mainstream comic universe.

 

[DeathChill]

Well, I definitely enjoyed this post expect for the bold, haha. TDKR, to me, was the better of the three(with Avengers at 2 and TAS-M at 3) and TDKR SHOULD still be nominated for Best Film. It was that good.

I just can't see TDKR being nominated for best picture. If TDK didn't get it, there's just no way TDKR should.

 

[JKKS085]

Sorry, but you two couldn't be more wrong. The Amazing Spider-Man, very much like Batman Begins back in 2005, it's a reboot of a superhero franchise. And as a reboot of a superhero franchise, it's set to become the highest grossing reboot of all time.

Let's take a look at the numbers.

1. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012): $614,611,425 WW (3rd weekend)
2. Iron Man 2 (2010): $623,933,331 WW
3. Iron Man (2008): $585,174,222 WW
4. Thor (2011): $449,326,618
5. Captain America: First Avenger (2011): $368,608,363
6. The Incredible Hulk (2008): $263,427,551

So taking in context with his fellow Marvel Films, The Amazing Spider-Man is bound to keep the crown as the highest grossing solo Marvel superhero. The only Marvel property based on Marvel characters that made more than any other Spider-Man film is The Avengers, which is an assemble never done before kind of superhero film.

Adjusting WW numbers for inflation and taking production budgets in account would probably help for a better comparision.
Then again, considering TASM's production budget and the fact that the studio will only get between 10% & 15% of it's overseas gross makes the movie a lot less profitable than the two Iron Man movie wich both made more than 300 millions domestically (and were produced for under 200 millions).

Now if we look to the other reboots:

1. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012): Domestic $228,611,425 + Foreign $386,000,000 = $614,611,425 WW (3rd weekend)
2. Star Trek (2009): Domestic $257,730,019 + Foreign $127,950,427 = $385,680,446 WW
3. Batman Begins (2005): Domestic $205,343,774 + Foreign $167,366,241 = $372,710,015 WW
4. Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011): Domestic $176,760,185 + Foreign $305,040,68 = $481,800,873 WW
5. Cassino Royale (2006): Domestic $167,445,960 + Foreign $426,793,106 = $594,239,066 WW
6. X-Men First Class = Domestic $146,408,305 + Foreign $207,215,819 = $353,624,124

Even though the foreign grosses counting isn't how Bruce Malone quoted from an article some pages ago, The Amazing Spider-Man still comes up on the road of becoming the highest grossing reboot of all time, topping Star Trek in domestic grossings and with a far more profitable foreign grossing.

Once again you should have adjusted the numbers. None of those reboots had expensive 3D showings to help. And none of them was produced for more than 200 millions. And considering that terrible 10 millions (-68%) 3rd week-end I have yet to see TASM's topping Star Trek. And even though that may very well happen, except for James Bond with the financially successful but poorly received Die Another Day, none of those franchise can fairly be compared to Spider-Man. Batman was pretty much dead before Batman Begins, the last Star Trek movie to gross over 100 millions domestically was released back in 1986. And yet Casino Royale managed to make more money than any of its predecessors. That's pleasing old and new fans while TASM is a step back in ticket sales from the Raimi trilogy.

First Class is a loose prequel but not a reboot considering that there are elements in it that tie the movie with the rest of the trilogy.
And finally if The Hollywood Economist is wrong, maybe you can enlighten us as to how much studios take in from overseas revenue.

And even if doesn't top that, I have a feeling that just like Batman Begins compared to TDK, the sequel will benefit from a huge jump in the grosses.

First off, TASM was nowhere near as well received as Batman Begins back in 2005.
Secondly, if Sony keeps on heavily interfering with the creative crew during the production process (numbers suggest they will), I highly doubt that a "TDK quality" sequel is even possible. And without a huge buzz, those numbers (500 millions and more domestically) are just unreachable.

 

[Mike]

Adjusting WW numbers for inflation and taking production budgets in account would probably help for a better comparision.
Then again, considering TASM's production budget and the fact that the studio will only get between 10% & 15% of it's overseas gross makes the movie a lot less profitable than the two Iron Man movie wich both made more than 300 millions domestically (and were produced for under 200 millions)




Then again you should have adjusted the numbers. None of those reboots had expensive 3D showings to help. And none of them was produced for more than 200 millions. And considering that terrible 10 millions (-68%) 3rd week-end I have yet to see TASM's topping Star Trek. And even though that may very well happen, except for James Bond with the financially successful but poorly received Die Another Day, none of those franchise can fairly be compared to Spider-Man. Batman was pretty much dead before Batman Begins, the last Star Trek movie to gross over 100 millions domestically was released back in 1986. And yet Casino Royale managed to make more money than any of its predecessors. That's pleasing old an new fans while TASM is a massive step back in ticket sales from the Raimi trilogy.

Finally if The Hollywood Economist is wrong, maybe you can enlighten us as to how much studios take in from overseas revenue.



First off, TASM was nowhere near as well received as Batman Begins was back in 2008.
Secondly, And if Sony keeps on heavily interfering with the creative crew during the production process (numbers suggest they will), I highly doubt that a "TDK quality" sequel is even possible. And without a huge buzz, those numbers (500 millions and more domestically) are just unreachable.

and tasm isnt a critical failure either. Most critics gave it favorable reviews. The GA thought it was good aswell. This is just like batman begins and casino royale all over again on the shh forums. Everything is a tad exaggerated and nitpicked. We are going to get a sequel and it will make more than its predecessor. Tasm3 is what im worried about.

 

[Anno_Domini]

I just can't see TDKR being nominated for best picture. If TDK didn't get it, there's just no way TDKR should.

And with TDK not being nominated, it caused for there to be a larger number of nominees, thus, TDKR has its chance now.

 

[Superhero 101]

Maybe he was alluding to 616, which is the number for the mainstream comic universe.

you sir are correct

 

[milesalpha]

Sorry, but you two couldn't be more wrong. The Amazing Spider-Man, very much like Batman Begins back in 2005, it's a reboot of a superhero franchise. And as a reboot of a superhero franchise, it's set to become the highest grossing reboot of all time.

Let's take a look at the numbers.

1. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012): $614,611,425 WW (3rd weekend)
2. Iron Man 2 (2010): $623,933,331 WW
3. Iron Man (2008): $585,174,222 WW
4. Thor (2011): $449,326,618
5. Captain America: First Avenger (2011): $368,608,363
6. The Incredible Hulk (2008): $263,427,551

So taking in context with his fellow Marvel Films, The Amazing Spider-Man is bound to keep the crown as the highest grossing solo Marvel superhero. The only Marvel property based on Marvel characters that made more than any other Spider-Man film is The Avengers, which is an assemble never done before kind of superhero film.

Now if we look to the other reboots:

1. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012): Domestic $228,611,425 + Foreign $386,000,000 = $614,611,425 WW (3rd weekend)
2. Star Trek (2009): Domestic $257,730,019 + Foreign $127,950,427 = $385,680,446 WW
3. Batman Begins (2005): Domestic $205,343,774 + Foreign $167,366,241 = $372,710,015 WW
4. Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011): Domestic $176,760,185 + Foreign $305,040,68 = $481,800,873 WW
5. Cassino Royale (2006): Domestic $167,445,960 + Foreign $426,793,106 = $594,239,066 WW
6. X-Men First Class = Domestic $146,408,305 + Foreign $207,215,819 = $353,624,124

Even though the foreign grosses counting isn't how Bruce Malone quoted from an article some pages ago, The Amazing Spider-Man still comes up on the road of becoming the highest grossing reboot of all time, topping Star Trek in domestic grossings and with a far more profitable foreign grossing.

So let's see:

Still biggest solo superhero Marvel solo franchise: Check
Biggest box office reboot of all time: Check
Successfully making a reboot that pleases new and old fans: Check

Unlike you two have posted, neither Iron Man 1 and 2 were bigger successes than The Amazing Spider-Man or the purpose of a reboot is to make more than its previous film. The purpose of a reboot is to get a franchise back in a position of being profitable again. The Amazing Spider-Man achieves that in spades, and it has still a shot of topping Spider-Man 2 WW grosses, which is $783,766,341. And even if doesn't top that, I have a feeling that just like Batman Begins compared to TDK, the sequel will benefit from a huge jump in the grosses. So yeah, my point is that Sony not only managed to make the second best superhero film of the year and best Spider-Man film yet, The Amazing Spider-Man is a winner.

And I pity those who rooted against it. The Dark Knight Rises seems that will have FAR MORE problems to break even without blu-ray sales than The Amazing Spider-Man ever will.



It has been an incredible summer for superhero movies indeed, and like you I'll be purchasing the blu ray releases of all of them. With that said, I can't deny how disappointed I am with TDKR. For all the talk of Best Picture nominations, I was ready to see The Amazing Spider-Man as 3rd and The Avengers as 2nd best superhero film of the year. Instead I'm rating them like this:

1. The Avengers 10/10
2. The Amazing Spider-Man 9.5/10
3. The Dark Knight Rises 4/10

I'm still thankful to Nolan for two of the best Batman films ever though.

This is why you have to treat numbers with respect, if you don't you get then you get something like this, most of which just has no meaning. Go back to the drawing board, and figure out what the studio actually receives, this is the number that they worry about.

And it pleased old and new fans? How exactly do you measure that?

When did the Spiderman franchise fall out of profitability?

How is Iron Man not more profitable that TA?. It does not appear to be even close.

How does matching a WW gross mean movie A and and Movie B are equal, considering the huge disparity between the value of the domestic and international box offices?

Rooted against the movie? Er, ok.

 

[milesalpha]

Well, it just made its budget in the States alone:
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=spiderman4.htm

Which means it earned 2 million yesterday, Monday. If it continues like that, then I predict it'll earn around 243 million by the end of Sunday.

1.5 actually, just have to hit that daily tab. More importantly, have a look at the per screen average. It's gonna lose 400-500 screens again this week, after losing over 500 screens after the second week, not a good sign.

It has made it's budget, but that doesn't mean it has paid for itself. Not to worry, it will.

 

[JKKS085]

and tasm isnt a critical failure either. Most critics gave it favorable reviews. The GA thought it was good aswell. This is just like batman begins and casino royale all over again on the shh forums. Everything is a tad exaggerated and nitpicked. We are going to get a sequel and it will make more than its predecessor. Tasm3 is what im worried about.

I've never said that it was a failure, just that Batman Begins got overall better reviews. Sure we'll get a sequel but under what conditions ? More studio interferences ? More rough cuts ? An even blander storyline just to make sure to please the average summer moviegoer (and nothing too eccentric that would put the fans off) ? That's precisely what I'm worried about at the moment.

 

[©KAW]

And with TDK not being nominated, it caused for there to be a larger number of nominees, thus, TDKR has its chance now.

Nominated for what exactly? TDKR is no TDK, it simply doesn't deserve it on any of the key categories.

 

[American_Hobo]

I think boxoffice shows people are not as interested on this movie than previous Raimi's movies.

Domestic - 230M so far, should've been higher.

International - Wikipeda says 614M, but let's be honest, the movie would make insane amount of money internationally whether it's good or bad movie because it's SPIDERMAN.

So if you ask me, people are less interestd on this movie than previous ones.