The Amazing Spider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man: Box Office Thread - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
And I'm positive it'll reach 700m very soon.
 
At the very last day of its third week(21st day).
No,way before that
In Around 12 days I think

It was never expected except by you apparently as still no one assumed this before.
Tell me who didnt assume?
Is it too much to assume for a movie to cross 700M when the sequel made 900M?

Then how come everyone else says it did and you're the only one I've meant on these forums that seems too stubborn to acknowledge this fact?
Because I dont believe that TASM exists because of BB like you keep saying
Lol....I should've said earlier "and don't reply with more awful questions about TDK" :dry:
They are less awful than......Well you know

No...you could counter biasness with facts, which I've done. You counter supposed "biasness" with dumbfounded comments.
I have been posting facts all along that this is the 2nd best reboot if not the best yet
All you have been saying is 'It SHOULD have done better'

Because you know who started the trend? C'mon, I'll give you a hint. The movie was released in 2005.
They didnt give a rat ass about trend
There were 2 options to be different from the '02 movie...Either go the IC way and show the origin in a brief montage and concentrate on the main villian OR make the origin a major part of the movie
They went with the second option

The police chief didn't slander; he just had the wrong idea of Spider-Man. But the whole agenda of using the police force? Yep, you guessed it :up:
It was replacing Jameson.Fact

You trying to use the exact same words as I did does not help your case, but I like the effort. Keep trying
You still havent disproved me..I think you can do better than posting simileys

Gas. Is. Gas.
Nuclear Fusion is Nuclear Fusion

And yet still isn't the exact numbered installment as BB and TAS-M are
And thats important because?

And it still didn't make up its budget as BB did in 18 days.
Yes it did it in some 12-15 days

Hey, that's fine. But I don't have much faith in what TAS-M 2 will do in the box office now.
And you probably didnt have this kind of belief with TDK?
As I said,you biasness is out of the world

Unlike Batman Begins..this movie also made money outside North America

Yah, keep telling yourself that dude.
He was even friendzoned..no wonder he cried
The guy who left your father for dead..Sleep with him
The guy who gave everything for you..Goodbye my friend
Why?Because **** logic that why

They shouldn't have copied or OR even made TAS-M period. Yah, I said it :cwink:
And yet you saw it twice :D

TDKR was supposedly 4 hours long,and its final cut is 2:45
So I guess WB intervened and chopped the movie
What a dummy Nolan is

No...that's not interfering at all. That's helping the director when it comes to such a huge property. Helping with the decisions is FAR different than pushing characters into the product.
Keep telling yourself that

Nah, it is.
Its just a collection of reviews..so here you are disagreeing with 250 odd reviewers

Was Batman & Robin hyped? No, it wasn't. Hyped and anticipated movies aren't generally with awful quality films.
Very Very bad logic
Movies like Iron Man werent hyped either and neither was Batman Begins
Hype has something to do with the fanbase and the previous movies released..the advantage that a first movie does not have

Hey, that's fine if you think that.
It's worse when someone can say a children's film is better than TAS-M
Madagascer>BB :D

TDKR>TAS-M
Still way lower than TDK
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
200,548
Messages
21,758,632
Members
45,593
Latest member
Jeremija
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"