Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]387205[/split]
I am sharpening my pitchfork in anticipation for RIM's review...... Only smoking, I will curious to hear what he has to say.
Dude...weed is still illegal.
The majority of the negative reviews I'm seeing seem to be negative just simply because "it's the same movie as before." They're not judging the move by the quality of the story, acting, characters etc. This sounds pretty biased. Whereas all the postive reviews I've seen are viewing it as the previous films never existed.
It's shame that there is nothing we can do about it. The comparisons are inevitable.The majority of the negative reviews I'm seeing seem to be negative just simply because "it's the same movie as before." They're not judging the move by the quality of the story, acting, characters etc. This sounds pretty biased. Whereas all the postive reviews I've seen are viewing it as the previous films never existed.
yeah, and personal amounts have been decriminalized in many areas.
But don't get any idea, young man! 18+
Some people believe that's a valid criticism though.
Yeah, and personal amounts have been decriminalized in many areas.
But don't get any idea, young man! 18+
True, but that doesn't mean that it is a valid criticism.It is valid criticism. When Batman gets rebooted and they do another origin story, it will get compared.
It is valid criticism. When Batman gets rebooted and they do another origin story, it will get compared.
I don't need weed...I have paint and sharpies!!!! t:
Seriously though, I'll never do anything like that. Ever.
It is valid criticism. When Batman gets rebooted and they do another origin story, it will get compared.
It is valid criticism. When Batman gets rebooted and they do another origin story, it will get compared.
But it's almost like this movie is getting points knocked off just because the previous movie trilogy exists.