The Amazing Spider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man (First Reactions: Critics, Fans) (Spoiler Alert) - - - Part 12

Status
Not open for further replies.
So that makes you more right?

Uh, no, I gave a reason as to why I am as I am.
Would you like some more green eggs and ham?
I'm not blindly biased, I'm just looking forward to the movie.
The villain aspects and things like that don't bother me, because I'm only seeing this movie to see Peter Parker. That's the whole reason why I like Spider-Man.
 
You're telling me that as you sat in the theater, and the team assembled for the first time in the same shot, and this played:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNdZFPitS1Q#t=64

It didn't resonate somehow?

That is exactly what I am telling you. We live in the world that has been blessed by the likes of John Williams. We have Planet Krypton, The Imperial March and Hedwig's Theme to name a few. That doesn't compare.
 
One complaint I'm not getting is the score. Are they hearing the same score I am? Because I'm the first to say when these superhero scores are lackluster (and most recent ones are), but it's no exaggeration for me when I say this is EASILY the best superhero theme I've heard in the last decade. It actually IS a "hummable," memorable theme for the first time in ages, and yet, people are still complaining. Just don't get it. I mean, is it not mixed to full effect in the actual film or something? :huh:

I mostly notice the score on 2nd viewing and after that
Maybe I'll like it when I watch it again
 
Uh, no, I gave a reason as to why I am as I am.
Would you like some more green eggs and ham?
I'm not blindly biased, I'm just looking forward to the movie.
The villain aspects and things like that don't bother me, because I'm only seeing this movie to see Peter Parker. That's the whole reason why I like Spider-Man.

You have an admitted bias.

Her purpose was nipples?

I approve. :up:

Having finally seen Dunst's upper frontal region exposed, I must say it was worth the wait.
 
Her purpose was nipples?

I approve. :up:

I can just imagine Sam Raimi:

kirsten-dunst-in-spiderman-371x400.jpg

"Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...cut."
 
I just really liked MJ in the first Spider-Man movie. Maybe it was just because of that scene. LOL
 
as far as the MJ ****e issue, they painted her with a pretty ****y brush.

what was it that really made us as an audience like her? was it that she was with the coolest guy in the school? or that our hero felt like he needed a cool car in order to get her? the fact that she then went on to the richest guy in the school? how about how she kissed spiderman while in a relationship (which btw, makes her go apes#$% in sm3)? i mean, what about her made her attracted to peter? nothing in the movie told us she was concerned with ANYTHING outside of herself and things.

well, certainly it must be that she was a good person. ummm, but then she opines for peter WHILE she's engaged to be married? kisses another guy while in a relationship. and then leaves a genuinely decent character on the altar. so i guess she's not that good afterall.

so why would peter want this dbag again? i dont know. thats just the way it is cause the comic book said so.

there was absolutely nothing of value to her character.

:up:
 
You have an admitted bias.

I'm not biased or fan boyish to the point where I think this movie will make a billion dollars and be labelled the greatest movie in the history of history of history. But yeah, I'm biased.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"