Age of Ultron The Avengers 2! The Official News and Speculation Thread - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's nothing wrong with discussing Thanos and the IG, HOWEVER 3+ pages of talking about the lighting of the Gauntlet and resorting to pixels is dull dull dull.

I still believe the idea that the Gauntlet in Odin's possession is a fake. Maybe Thanos will come for it in TDW, and then it's revealed the real Gems have been scattered across space and time setting up a major plotline for the next run of movies.
 
With Hugh Jackman stating he wants to be in Avengers 2. Would you rather see Spiderman or Wolverine in Avengers 2?
 
There's nothing wrong with discussing Thanos and the IG, HOWEVER 3+ pages of talking about the lighting of the Gauntlet and resorting to pixels is dull dull dull.

I still believe the idea that the Gauntlet in Odin's possession is a fake. Maybe Thanos will come for it in TDW, and then it's revealed the real Gems have been scattered across space and time setting up a major plotline for the next run of movies.

Makes sense to me. I always thought it was weird that such a powerful weapon would be displayed with all of the gems in place. ALL OF THE GEMS IN PLACE.

:cmad:
 
Neither.

Makes sense to me. I always thought it was weird that such a powerful weapon would be displayed with all of the gems in place. ALL OF THE GEMS IN PLACE.

:cmad:

Same, since the Gauntlet itself isn't the artifact. Given that, as you said, they're all in one place it's equally likely that it was merely a tease from Marvel to say that yes the Gauntlet and Gems are out there but it won't be canon
 
Last edited:
Yeah no Spidey or Wolverine in Avengers. Give me Jack of Hearts!
 
Perhaps it´s better to have an Ultron scenario or something in Ant-man and have Wolverine there and bring spidey into the Avengers 3. :)
 
Perhaps it´s better to have an Ultron scenario or something in Ant-man and have Wolverine there and bring spidey into the Avengers 3. :)

Let's not and say we did. :yay: Wolverine has no business anywhere near Ant-Man, or anything else for that matter that doesn't involve the X-Men. And even that's become debatable.
 
It´s true what you say, it doesn´t fit but It would be cool to have Jackman in TA,
I don´t think the movie right owners will come to an agreement so I don´t see it happening in TA, even if others think it might happen.

But I thought perhaps in some other Marvel movie with some other heroes,
it would be possible for Jackman to participate.

That´s why I thoght about Ant-man. Utron could seek to enhance his body with vibranium or admantium and therefore involve perhaps BP and Wolverine.

But yeah it doesn´t fit! :)
 
The Oscorp and Daily Bugle buildings will be visible in the Manhattan skyline in A2 indicating a collab by MS and Sony. Spidey will be in A3, book it!!
 
The Oscorp and Daily Bugle buildings will be visible in the Manhattan skyline in A2 indicating a collab by MS and Sony. Spidey will be in A3, book it!!

Some old lady just saw a trailer for Hugh Jackman on the A2 set.
 
I think there are enough other characters that we want to see in Avengers, that we don't need to worry about Wolverine or Spider-man. If they want Easter egg references, I'm cool with that.
 
Fair enough. It would clutter up, and be a mess. But My question is why would you guys want a bunch of no names in the Movie world to be in The Avengers 2? I know the characters you want, where in the comics, but still. I'm fine with 2 or 3 new characters (That haven't been in their own movie) be in the sequel, but no more, IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"