The Clinton Thread II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can anyone explain why Hillary is so "untrustworthy" and "incompetent"? Please don't bring up the e-mails thing, her evolving stance on issues or the Clinton foundation. Is it something that's tangible or is it due to her gender/husband's history at the White House?

And something that's not a partisan site like Mother Jones, New York Daily Post, or Breitbart.

Because the GOP has been pushing a smear campaign since 2008 knowing full well she'd run this year.
 
Can anyone explain why Hillary is so "untrustworthy" and "incompetent"? Please don't bring up the e-mails thing, her evolving stance on issues or the Clinton foundation.
Yeah, let's just disregard all this stuff.
Is it something that's tangible or is it due to her gender/husband's history at the White House?
Her gender has nothing to do with her being corrupt and untrustworthy. Being a woman does not make Clinton immune from criticism either, nor does said criticism of Clinton make me a woman hater. If anything, she should be grilled harder than she is.
 
Can anyone explain why Hillary is so "untrustworthy" and "incompetent"? Please don't bring up the e-mails thing, her evolving stance on issues or the Clinton foundation. Is it something that's tangible or is it due to her gender/husband's history at the White House?

And something that's not a partisan site like Mother Jones, New York Daily Post, or Breitbart.

There are a lot that have hated Hillary for a long time. Here is a story from 1996.

Hating Hillary
 
Yeah, let's just disregard all this stuff.

Her gender has nothing to do with her being corrupt and untrustworthy. Being a woman does not make Clinton immune from criticism either, nor does said criticism of Clinton make me a woman hater. If anything, she should be grilled harder than she is.

I get the e-mails complaint to a degree, but the GOP is trying to stoke a fire that isn't there. Most of the Foundation donors seeking favors and/or meetings were rebuffed, and there's no tangible proof (yet) of conflict of interest between the Foundation and its donors.

There's nothing hypocritical about Clinton like Trump spewing anti-immigrant hate but hiring undocumented models for slave labor. Or him claiming to create American jobs when all of his clothes are made outside the U.S.. Where's the equivalent for Hillary? Conservatives say she 'stole' $6 billion, when that was due to bad paperwork. Throughout the decades, she has been subjected to countless GOP witch hunts due to her gender and affiliation -- and that was before she decided to run for the Oval Office.

I'm not voting for her because she's a woman, but because she is the most qualified candidate. She's not going to turn the world into a global apocalyptic wasteland due to a mean Tweet, or sully America's name by insulting world leaders.
 
I get the e-mails complaint to a degree, but the GOP is trying to stoke a fire that isn't there. Most of the Foundation donors seeking favors and/or meetings were rebuffed, and there's no tangible proof (yet) of conflict of interest between the Foundation and its donors.
Either she or FBI director Comey lied under oath. But, hey, govt officials before have been above the law, including herself, what's another incident to add to that list?
The gripe is that she's so careless she can't even be trusted with national security given this unauthorized server with BS security. Plus, she or her lawyers/administration purged the evidence.
The jury's still out on the foundation with a separate investigation.

Throughout the decades, she has been subjected to countless GOP witch hunts due to her gender and affiliation -- and that was before she decided to run for the Oval Office.
You can research for yourself and rationalize which of the many "Gates" and scandals are justified or not.
Hillary and Bill are a package deal like "Bonnie and Clyde".

I'm not voting for her because she's a woman, but because she is the most qualified candidate. She's not going to turn the world into a global apocalyptic wasteland due to a mean Tweet, or sully America's name by insulting world leaders.
That's because she doesn't need a mean tweet to turn the world into a global apocalyptic wasteland (also, what????) and instead of insulting world leaders (if she's not utilizing subtle insults) she's bound to sully America's name by charming them ~ "doing favors"/rack up those scandals.

Any who...

Thought this was adorable

[YT]vuegl6ob0Po[/YT]

Oh and her approval ratings recently hit a new record.
 
Last edited:
It's been over 260 days without Clinton having a press conference. Her media statements are really short, too. And in her recent one, she dodged questions and instead offered the reporters chocolates. And they just go along with that? I mean....really?

If they give non-scripted questions she may have another one of those 'short circuits'.

The FBI has also admitted Clinton used software designed to prevent recovery and hide traces of deleted emails. But we're meant to believe she only deleted innocuous messages. Right.

She's still not Trump. That's the only important thing here, or at least to my libertarian pragmatist's eye. That said, my biggest concern with Hillary isn't this presser stuff. Rather its the sabre-rattling at Russia over the DNC stuff. My own philosophy is, get your messes together and fix them; in this case, get your security systems up to snuff rather than avoiding the problem. Sabre-rattling at Russia when you have these horrid images of people caught in the middle of the wars coming out of Syria - that's the bigger concern imo.

I don't want to see more of that on our watch.
 
Why has her approval level fallen so low in the last few days?
 
I wouldn't be worried about it. I don't think Trump had the best approval rating in the Rep primaries - and look at where their party is now. Look at how much approval Bernie had - and look at where he is now.
 
Why has her approval level fallen so low in the last few days?

Could be a number of factors. Not quite finding a new shocking controversy, so this must another peak from all the reporting piling on.
Her previous record low was reported a month ago.
 
You know what we need... Celebrity Deathmatch to return.
 
Either she or FBI director Comey lied under oath. But, hey, govt officials before have been above the law, including herself, what's another incident to add to that list?
The gripe is that she's so careless she can't even be trusted with national security given this unauthorized server with BS security. Plus, she or her lawyers/administration purged the evidence.
The jury's still out on the foundation with a separate investigation.

That is troubling. She really needs to address this.
 
The 5 most outrageous things Hillary Clinton said in her FBI interview

1. She cited her 2012 concussion as the reason that she cannot remember details of briefings during her "transition out of office."

2. She said she never even thought whether emails she exchanged on a future U.S. drone attack should be classified.

3. She said she thought the "C" before a paragraph indicated alphabetical order. The C actually stands for "classified."

4. She said no one ever raised concerns to her about her use of a private email server.

5. She said she could not recall any training on how to handle classified information.

---------------------------------------------------

Dodging Press

Getting a Bigger Transport for Press Passengers
 
No wonder her trustworthiness ratings are in the tank.

I think a problem is a lot Republicans think people support Hiliary because they think she is a great candidate. Some of her supporters may think that, but most think she is the lesser of two evils, it would take a huge smoking gun to convince a lot people that Trump is better then Hiliary and Republicans don't have that huge smoking gun.

The problem with the 2 party system is the GOP decided to loose its mind this election and don't want to act like a responsible opposition party. Thus there is no one holding Hiliary responsible on a lot of important policy issues. The GOP is crying wolf too much, they try to demonize Clinton so much, that its easy to ignore them, which means its easier for her to get away with shady stuff.
 
She's being demonized well enough in my facebook feed without whatever faux news is throwing on the fire.
 
Might be the Bernie Supporters. :oldrazz:

[YT]ktfas66rXUI[/YT]
 
No wonder her trustworthiness ratings are in the tank.
CrYEpkUUMAAUdr-.jpg
 
She's being demonized well enough in my facebook feed without whatever faux news is throwing on the fire.

People do need to distinguish between demonizing and demanding that Clinton be held accountable for her actions, that's how democracy works. While there might be undue focus on certain irrelevant things she's done some of her conduct is not exactly as honest and forthcoming as she should.
 
That thyroid problem sounds very serious.
Hopefully it's more like what my dad had (like for a good several months) and not much worse.
 
So, uh, will Monica live in the white house basement or the attic? Cause she is most definitely coming too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"