Endgame The Critics/Rotten Tomatoes thread

[Quentin Beck]

I'm not impressed anymore 98% or bad movie

If it doesn't reach 98% then I'm going have a 24 hour marathon of the new Hellboy film.

 

[MahvelBaby!]

Lol at the 2 who voted for under 60%

 

[harlequinade]

Lol at the 2 who voted for under 60%

Bet these are the same people who said this will be as divisive as TLJ :P

 

[Holy Slapper]

Lol at the 2 who voted for under 60%

Well what do you expect from a chesslover and a Batman fan?

 

[Naglfar]

TOMATOMETER
96%

Average Rating:8.28/10
Reviews Count: 374
Fresh: 360
Rotten: 14

Audience score back up to 93% (4.6/5)

 

[MahvelBaby!]

Well what do you expect from a chesslover and and Batman fan?

*manbat

 

[Fallen]

TOMATOMETER
96%
All Critics | Top Critics

Average Rating: 8.28/10
Reviews Count: 375
Fresh: 361
Rotten: 14

It needs 15 more fresh reviews to go back up to 97% .

 

[spiderman2]

With the amount of reviews now this will be at worst a 95 at best a 97 and I think most likely a 96.

 

[Quentin Beck]

TOMATOMETER
96%
All Critics | Top Critics

Average Rating: 8.28/10
Reviews Count: 375
Fresh: 361
Rotten: 14

It needs 15 more fresh reviews to go back up to 97% .

 

[Iceman]

With the amount of reviews now this will be at worst a 95 at best a 97 and I think most likely a 96.

Yeah we’re almost done and it shouldn’t move outside of that range.

 

[samsnee]

The New Yorker “review” is such garbage. The guy clearly doesn’t have an open mind to these types of commercial movies that I don’t know why he even bothered reviewing it.

 

[m2k]

I just hate slow RT count days. Suppose it's coming to an end.
Anyway here's to it hitting 97 and 8.3!

 

[Hannibal75]

The New Yorker “review” is such garbage. The guy clearly doesn’t have an open mind to these types of commercial movies that I don’t know why he even bothered reviewing it.

Is this Antohny Lane? I remember last year his Infinity War review had little to do with the movie and was a tirade against comic book movies in general.

 

[samsnee]

Yeap. Here’s a taste:

“One must, after all, respect the feelings of the saga’s devotees, who demand nothing from reviewers but sobs of nonspecific adulation. Anything else is treason. (In future years, I suspect, Marvel fandom will be regarded as a very peculiar phenomenon, and I wish that Michael Moore, say, could interrogate the faithful while the flame still burns.)

The one thing you do need to know about “Avengers: Endgame” is that it runs for a little over three hours, and that you can easily duck out during the middle hour, do some shopping, and slip back into your seat for the climax. You won’t have missed a thing”

The guy has a right to dislike it but sounds like he just has a bone to pick with comic book fans in general.

 

[MahvelBaby!]

It's gonna be a fun 11 more years of suffering for him

 

[Erzengel]

I have to say, and maybe it is that I'm invested and I'm sure I'm into the hundreds of times I've watched these movies, but it didn't feel like 3 hours to me.

 

[samsnee]

It flew by and felt more like a 2 hour movie. I think breaking it up into 3 distinct parts helped.

 

[Xeno]

I just realized that I never voted in this poll. On a whim, I chose "Above 90%". Finger crossed that I'm right.

The New Yorker “review” is such garbage. The guy clearly doesn’t have an open mind to these types of commercial movies that I don’t know why he even bothered reviewing it.

Quite a few of the "Top Critics" have written anti-blockbuster reviews of MCU films and other CBMs. Some reviewers who prefer indies like to pretend that if studios stopped producing superhero films tomorrow, they would suddenly spend billions per year making Oscar bait movies. They're horrendously salty whenever an MCU film seems destined to put up huge numbers because that's proof that the genre isn't going to die out anytime soon.

 

[MahvelBaby!]

Should've voted under 60 trololol

 

[daddydivine]

The New Yorker “review” is such garbage. The guy clearly doesn’t have an open mind to these types of commercial movies that I don’t know why he even bothered reviewing it.

Listen, whenever you think you've read a review so terrible, so indescribably ridiculous that you want to throw up. Just read Armond Whites review about the same movie and realize there is always a worst review out there.

 

[jaqua99]

Yeap. Here’s a taste:

“One must, after all, respect the feelings of the saga’s devotees, who demand nothing from reviewers but sobs of nonspecific adulation. Anything else is treason. (In future years, I suspect, Marvel fandom will be regarded as a very peculiar phenomenon, and I wish that Michael Moore, say, could interrogate the faithful while the flame still burns.)

The one thing you do need to know about “Avengers: Endgame” is that it runs for a little over three hours, and that you can easily duck out during the middle hour, do some shopping, and slip back into your seat for the climax. You won’t have missed a thing”

The guy has a right to dislike it but sounds like he just has a bone to pick with comic book fans in general.

He's right about the fandom though. Stepping outside,. There's a general disregard of any opinion that doesn't butter the MCU. The movies are hits. But are not without fault. Different strokes for different folks. People who dislike these films have opinions JUST as valid as those who love them. His annoyance is around the fact that die hard MCU fans can't seem to accept that.

I was one of those fans for a long time..

 

[RoastBeast]

Yeah, but I bet if I told him to his face I didn't like, say, Pulp Fiction or The Godfather, he'd be up in my grill, too, just as angry!defensive.

 

[MahvelBaby!]

Oh he's right? ...well screw him anyway

 

[samsnee]

He's right about the fandom though. Stepping outside,. There's a general disregard of any opinion that doesn't butter the MCU. The movies are hits. But are not without fault. Different strokes for different folks. People who dislike these films have opinions JUST as valid as those who love them. His annoyance is around the fact that die hard MCU fans can't seem to accept that.

I was one of those fans for a long time..

How does disparaging fans of the genre have any place in a review of a movie?

 

[Webfoot Hero]

How does disparaging fans of the genre have any place in a review of a movie?

It doesn't and why I avoid certain critics who have done it in past reviews. It's so condescending, smug, and elitist to look down on people for liking a particular genre/style of film.