He only appears short when next to Neeson because Neeson's so tall himself. Besides, it's not like Batman's supposed to be the tallest guy ever either. I'm pretty sure Superman's taller than him in the comics (and movies, come to think of it).One thing for sure (love him as I might) he's probably still too short.
Did you see in BB how dwarfed he was standing next to Ra's?
You may begin the flaming on me now.![]()
Should we include the supposed official synopsis in the FAQ?
So Jonathan Nolan is writing the script of TDK, is David Goyer doing anything in this movie? Does Chris Nolan have storyline input in the sequel?
I'd just like to know, if this sequel does indeed start a few months or years after BB, what in the hell has Batman been doing? The Joker's already robbing banks and doing double homicides by the end of the first movie, I don't think that's the kind of criminal you let slide for a few months is it? Since nolan is really entrenched in his realistic approach, I wonder how it's explained, if at all.
I thought The Killing Joke was pretty tight, and if there was one thing i didn't like about Begins, it was that Batman became aware of the Joker. Through all of his incarnations, Batman was always there when the dude fell into the chemicals and actually became the joker, so is that whole scenario actually even gonna make it's way onto TDK? Are they gonna explain it like that, having Batman be there and everything, is it gonna be flashback, or are they gonna make up some new BS story not really involving Batman? Either way, I know I'm gonna go see the movie and love it ten times as much as Begins, but I really wanna know.
Sorry if this was asked, i didn't wanna look through 27 pages :P
if there was one thing i didn't like about Begins, it was that Batman became aware of the Joker. Through all of his incarnations, Batman was always there when the dude fell into the chemicals and actually became the joker, so is that whole scenario actually even gonna make it's way onto TDK?
Well there's one way they could do it...........have the Joker as one of the thugs helping Crane pour the chemicals in Arkham Asylum. After Batman showed up he was throwing goons all over the place and it was full of vats and chemical set-ups. There's also plently of scenarios that could have happened in the Narrows, maybe Batman threw Joker into a exploding water main or gas pipe.
Well there's one way they could do it...........have the Joker as one of the thugs helping Crane pour the chemicals in Arkham Asylum. After Batman showed up he was throwing goons all over the place and it was full of vats and chemical set-ups. There's also plently of scenarios that could have happened in the Narrows, maybe Batman threw Joker into a exploding water main or gas pipe.
i think the third film has the potential to be the best out of all of them.I don't think Dent should even turn into Two-Face in this film. I think he should get the acid thrown in his face in the THIRD film. We need a movie to introduce Dent first, to get us to sympathize with him, attatched to him, all that good stuff. Two-Face's role in the story of Harvey Dent is really the ending of Harvey Dent. It's how he becomes a monster: something he had been trying to fight. It's really a tragic saga that requires two films: to show Harvey's connection with Batman, his connection with Gordon, his slow descent obsession, and finally the staggering act of violence that sends him over the edge.