Octoberist
point blank
- Joined
- May 13, 2005
- Messages
- 46,465
- Reaction score
- 17
- Points
- 33
Why do so many people rag on X-Men 3? Yeah, it could have been better, but I thought it was a good movie overall, and as the closing chapter of the X-Men trilogy I was quite satisfied with it. I think that people unleash a lot of unwarranted resentment on it just because of the politics behind Bryan Singer not directing it.
Think of it this way people: if Fox had done what so many fanboys wanted and waited a year or longer for Bryan Singer to finish making Superman Returns, they would have lost half the cast. Many of the returning X-Men cast members have very high price tags, and are in demand for a lot of projects. If Fox missed their planned window for making X-Men 3, they might not have been able to make it at all without recasts and / or even more character deaths.
My major gripe with X3 is and always has been that I feel it should have been a half hour longer. There were a lot of stories going on that I wanted to see explored further, but due to time constraints they couldn't. But hey, a movie that leaves you wanting more is at least better than a movie that makes you shout "when is this thing over?" at the screen (read: Superman Returns.)
It's pretty obvious dude. I can see how someone could defend Fox's other (AVERAGE) property Fantastic Four, but not X3. NOT X-3!
Cyclops dying without any remorse from his team-mates; new characters being introduced while old ones are either killed, are MIA or get mistreated (Mystique, Nightcrawler); misguided main plot with the serum instead of the Phoenix story; Logan being the one who saves Jean at the end; weird editing, and the list goes on?
