Oh I don't know. I still would have liked to have seen Routh do one with Sophia Bush as Lois. maybe Bruce Willis as Lex.
Jon Hamm is typical fan casting for Superman, he sort of resembles the look of KC Superman so he gets chosen. Sure he’s a decent actor but in terms of how he performs he just doesn’t come across like Superman at all for me. It’s like the whole anyone whose bald for Lex thing we see I with fancastings.
The most important aspect of KC Superman is he feels like he has a history, which Brandon Routh has. Plus he has that factor that presence that belongs to Superman so I’d take him anyway over Hamm.
Routh was fine as Superman Returns—unfortunately, it was a case of an actor outshining the rest of the film around him. Sure he has history, but if you’re putting him up against Hamm I think it’d be a no-brainer to pick the bigger name (who just also happens to be critically acclaimed).
Big names and Superman don’t go together, it’s always better if it’s an unknown, lesser known or sone one whose played the role before. Jon Hamm would be a Jon Hamm in a Superman outfit.
Maybe it’s time to change that. WB had good luck with an unknown exactly once: Christopher Reeve. 40 some years ago?
Routh didn’t get a sequel, and who knows what Cavill’s future is with the DCEU. Blame doesn’t lay fully with these two actors, of course, but we can’t pretend they were a smashing success with audiences or WB wouldn’t be so gun-shy in green-lighting future Superman projects with either of them attached.
They never went for an unknown for Batman—those movies are Hollywood legends, for better or worse. Since Superman II, has any Superman film done anything to make waves?
I honestly don't buy that argument very much. I think the name Donner brought up as an example of an actor who was too recognizable is Robert Redford, but are you telling me Robert Redford couldn't have made an amazing Superman? The job of an actor is to convince you that they're the character, suspending your disbelief is part of going to the movies.
I don't agree!
I don't think Cavill was really an unknown either. He had already been the lead of a big budget movie like Immortals and was a main cast member of a very successful cable show for years.
Can it really be called a correct formula for film when it's only ever worked that one time for Reeve?
Just playing devil's advocate there. I also think an unknown is probably best for Superman.
Yes I'd agree it's been successful for tv, but for film I'd still argue that it's only worked the once. I wouldn't say that most people like Routh or Cavill in the role. They have vocal followings on this forum, sure, but generally speaking, I'd say the response to both has been very mixed at best.
Those aren't very good comparisons. A big star wasn't going to be in a low budget television show in the 50s or even the 80s. Tom Welling was playing the role of a teenage Superman, there's not really many big teenage stars that are going to sign on to an ongoing series on the CW. Every person who get a teenage role on the CW is an unknown. And Tyler Hoechlin has been acting since he was a child.
Yes, the reason is that big stars didn't taking leading roles in television back then. It wasn't even an option. Cary Grant wasn't looking for pilots to star in. Even now Will Smith isn't going to be in a CW show.
Tyler Hoechlin is a television star. He had a main role in Teen Wolf for three years before being cast as Superman. Also Seventh Heaven when he was younger.
 
				