The Hunger Games - Part 2

back to casting suggestions. lots of great choices for Coin, but some of them may be too big of a price tag to try and get, who knows?

another choice i've thought of possibly would be Joan Allen

I'm still behind Helen Mirren. I don't think price would be too big a deal with her, since she kinda does whichever kinda work she wants anymore. Red, the National Treasure sequel, Inkheart, a voiceover on Glee of all things.

i gotta admit i wouldn't want either of them men as finnick. don't hate them, but i don't think it'd work at all.

i see them casting someone less known, but heavy on the heartthrob meter. finnick has to be charismatic and good looking, which is why the capital loves him so much

He's probably too old now, but I kinda automatically went to Justin Hartley during my initial reading of the book.
 
so who wants the katniss barbie doll LOL
PHNsv7I2VSuNRR_1_m.jpg
it looks better then the first one they did for bella :word:
 
http://www.deadline.com/2012/04/gar...ger-games-2-catching-fire-lionsgate-in-shock/

Gary's not directing. His official statement:

Despite recent speculation in the media, and after difficult but sincere consideration, I have decided not to direct Catching Fire. As a writer and a director, I simply don’t have the time I need to write and prep the movie I would have wanted to make because of the fixed and tight production schedule.

I loved making The Hunger Games – it was the happiest experience of my professional life. Lionsgate was supportive of me in a manner that few directors ever experience in a franchise: they empowered me to make the film I wanted to make and backed the movie in a way that requires no explanation beyond the remarkable results. And contrary to what has been reported, negotiations with Lionsgate have not been problematic. They have also been very understanding of me through this difficult decision.

I also cannot say enough about the people I worked with: Producer Nina Jacobson, a great collaborator and a true friend; the brilliant Suzanne Collins, who entrusted us with her most amazing and important story; the gifted and remarkable Jennifer Lawrence whose performance exceeded my wildest expectations, and the rest of the incredible cast, whom I am proud to call my friends.

To the fans I want to say thank you for your support your faith, your enthusiasm and your trust. Hard as this may be to understand I am trying to keep that trust with you. Thank you all. It’s been a wonderful experience.


Lionsgate Statement:

We’re very sorry that Gary Ross has chosen not to direct Catching Fire. We were really looking forward to making the movie with him. He did an incredible job on the first film and we are grateful for his work. This will not be the end of our relationship, as we consider Ross to be part of the Lionsgate family and look forward to working with him in the future.
 
sounds like an x men 3 situation and sounds like gary pulled the smart matthew vaughn exit
 
Finke covering her tracks -- bullcrap. Someone out-scooped her on Gary Ross leaving, and she said something else entirely.

Looks like she's going to have to watch her rivals more closely, rather than just The Wrap...
 
Best thing that ever happened lately was Deadline reporting on an April Fools Joke. Priceless. :hehe:
 
I'm glad he's not directing the next one. I didn't think the movie was bad or anything but I think a lot of directors could have done it better. When most the book are people fighting at least direct a proper fight scene.
 
It was something more than just "I don't have time." Somebody screwed him over.
 
And there went the hopes for a good sequel. Clearly rushing this.
 
I'm still behind Helen Mirren. I don't think price would be too big a deal with her, since she kinda does whichever kinda work she wants anymore. Red, the National Treasure sequel, Inkheart, a voiceover on Glee of all things.

when did she voice over on glee? i missed that

now that you mention it, it does appear that mirren picks the roles she wants to do, nevermind the paycheck, which is fantastic imo. i wish more statured actors would do the same. heck, the cast alone could convince her and draw her in. or if she has any grandchildren, this would definitely make her even more popular in their book
 
when did she voice over on glee? i missed that

now that you mention it, it does appear that mirren picks the roles she wants to do, nevermind the paycheck, which is fantastic imo. i wish more statured actors would do the same. heck, the cast alone could convince her and draw her in. or if she has any grandchildren, this would definitely make her even more popular in their book

She was the voice of Becky (the cheerleader with Down Syndrome).
 
Obligatory context: I didn't know much about this. I knew the basic premise, I liked some the cast, I thought the trailer was mildly interesting, and I perused a copy of the book at Walmart. But wasn't all that hyped. No particular reason. It just never had room on my radar (I'm mean come on, we're so close to The Avengers. My brain only has so much hype it can spare). But my mom wanted to go so I went. And...

It's well acted, I like the look of the future world, and James Newton Howard's score was a 180 from his Green Lantern score (as in, it didn't suck). It has a certain thoughtful quality tonally and a slightly surreal one as well that I appreciated seeing in this type of mainstream Hollywood affair. But I was just never really that involved. Way too much set up for stuff that's clearly not going to matter until a sequel (I know how the critics of the Marvel movies for including all the Avengers foreshadowing must feel). They were exposition for a movie that doesn't exist yet. I never got what it was about, and I don't mean the plot. There's so much room to dig into some meaty ideas here, but it seems to hover along at the most broad and obvious level of satire, commentary, theme. It was really walking on eggshells. The ending just kinda stumbled into place too. Very anticlimactic. Also, what's up with those Hulk dog things? I'm still not sure what they were. Are they genetically engineered in the blink of an eye? Computer projections that can touch you and ruin your day? Crazy animal hybrids kept in stasis? I have no idea. I also didn't think it fit with the world building they'd been doing. Nothing in the movie previous made we think we were in a future with that kind of tech, and it didn't work as a revelation, it just completely threw me out of the movie. I've honestly not thought about it much since seeing it until now. I got home and started watching Doctor Who and my wife asked me how the movie was. I had to think for a moment to remember what I'd seen.

I still think I'd go see a sequel. I think this just barely missed crossing the finish line, and now that so much of the set up is out of the way, I think the story could possibly go to some interesting places.
 
It's a shame he isn't coming back. He brought a real, raw feeling to the first one. Plus, he put so much work into the sequel already. I hope they find a quality director to follow him
 
Its not that big of a deal if you asked me. Take Harry Potter for example, the first 2 were ok but Alfonso Cuarón came in and made the 3rd a more darker and serious movie and IMHO took the franchise in the right direction. I am alittle worried though about the rushed production on this one unless they have been working on a script for some time now. I just get big Xmen 3 hot flashes and we all saw how that one turned out.
 
I'm not trying to throw Ross under the bus because the movie was good but this happens all the time. It's not anything new.

I hope that a half way decent director comes on board.
 
I dont care who comes aboard just keep this P.O.S, S.O.B away from the franchise.






Brett-Ratner.jpg
 
It is a shame that they couldn't give him more time, I hate when the studio doesn't give directors time. I think the movie is good enough that a 2 year wait would be fine but the studio doesn't agree with me.
 
It is a shame that they couldn't give him more time, I hate when the studio doesn't give directors time. I think the movie is good enough that a 2 year wait would be fine but the studio doesn't agree with me.

"2 year wait?! No, it's now or never, get 'em while they're young!" dose creepy old studios, :lmao:
 
"2 year wait?! No, it's now or never, get 'em while they're young!" dose creepy old studios, :lmao:
The Hunger Games has good reviews and is probably going to gross between 360-375mil domestically. That's an insane domestic number, the studio should have more faith and not rush it too much.
 
On a more serious note, Im sorry but movies arent meant to be made and rushed in under a year timeframe. 2 years is the sweet spot now, You just need time to write a script, prep, shoot, edit.
 
Personally I always thought that 3 years was best but in this movie's case the actors are aging so I understand why they don't want to wait quite that long.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,272
Messages
22,078,008
Members
45,878
Latest member
Remembrance1988
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"