Schlosser85
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 30,209
- Points
- 0
I agree I see Redmayne more as Riddler, if anything.
I don't see Casey Affleck as Joker.
I don't see Casey Affleck as Joker.
YOU KNOW WHAT THAT IS?!Let’s ******ck!
I’ll **** anything that moves!
DO YOU KNOW WHAT A LOVE LETTER IS BATMAN?!?!
Tall, lanky, big smile, pointy chin, pale, creepy...
One of my favourite villains of all time lmao. Dennis Hopper could have killed it back in the 80’s as Joker.Let’s ******ck!
I’ll **** anything that moves!
DO YOU KNOW WHAT A LOVE LETTER IS BATMAN?!?!
Haven't seen Blue Velvet but I still think this is a really interesting idea. Reminds me of Tuco

No it's fair, I've thought about it some as well.It's just an idea I wanted to throw out there. Not something I'm super invested in but it could potentially be interesting
*Tuco SalamancaNo it's fair, I've thought about it some as well.
Although I do recommend you watch the movie first lol
Frank Booth or Stansfield inspired Joker getting high off his own supply to amp himself up before the kill would be pretty great to see
He was horrible in those Fantastic Beasts movies. Just an annoying, unlikeable protagonist. I haven’t liked him in any movies I’ve seen him in.Eddie Redmayne will forever be the guy that stole Michael Keaton's Oscar, and on that alone I want him to drop off the face of the earth forever.
Tuco has Jokerish tendencies but not really the IQ for him to be 100 percent a good influence*Tuco Salamanca
another Arthur like Joker? Might as well tie it into that universe then, like some people suggestDo not make Joker Frank Booth. Although I’d like a different portrayal of the Joker after Phoenix, Reeves is making a very realistic Batman world so an Arthur like Joker makes the most sense.
I could see the Joker singing In Dreams to Batman tbh.
'A candy coloured clown they call the sandman...'
It's funny how well Arthur Fleck with a slightly different history would fit in this world from what we've seen so far. I don't want him to because having to deal with Joker's canon and timeline sound like a pain (do they explicitly say it's 1981 in the movie or is it just vague 80s? I can't recall) but the look of him feels so right.Do not make Joker Frank Booth. Although I’d like a different portrayal of the Joker after Phoenix, Reeves is making a very realistic Batman world so an Arthur like Joker makes the most sense.
It does, but I don't want another face paint Joker either. It doesn't even have to be a result of chemical bleaching; if they really want to explain it, just make it a skin condition or something like that.It's funny how well Arthur Fleck with a slightly different history would fit in this world from what we've seen so far. I don't want him to because having to deal with Joker's canon and timeline sound like a pain (do they explicitly say it's 1981 in the movie or is it just vague 80s? I can't recall) but the look of him feels so right.