The Justice League General & Speculation Discussion Thread - Part 10

[Thread Manager]

This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]531517[/split]

 

[Thread Manager]

This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]531327[/split]

 

[Superchan]

I guess color doesn't count unless it's really bright.

It does, but after almost 5 hrs of seeing superman in muted colors it would be nice to see some more vibrancy in Superman's appearance.

brb colour correcting "Mona Lisa", gotta turn up the saturation and brightness, its too dark and gritty smh

Mona lisa doesn't wear a bright red and blue costume and I've seen the mona lisa up close and that image still has more colors than a Snyder DCEU movie.

 

[adeel7861]

It does, but after almost 5 hrs of seeing superman in muted colors it would be nice to see some more vibrancy in Superman's appearance.

The film noise doesn't help either. Or should I say the extra film noise. Although I did love the way his suit looked in BvS.

 

[Paradox1]

Superman's costume looks bright as hell to me lmao. However I've read everyone sees colors differently. So it makes me wonder why so many people seem to share this opinion. I know it's hearsay but color is actually subjective. So when someone says the colors are mute, it may not actually be mute just their perception of it.

 

[Black Narcissus]

I can smell it coming:

 

[Guts]

It does, but after almost 5 hrs of seeing superman in muted colors it would be nice to see some more vibrancy in Superman's appearance.



Mona lisa doesn't wear a bright red and blue costume and I've seen the mona lisa up close and that image still has more colors than a Snyder DCEU movie.

There are plenty of colors in Snyder's DCEU movies.

 

[KRYPTON INC.]

Can someone explain to me the term "film noise"? Never came across it before, but then, I am a layman. Some sort of film school terminology?

 

[matt47]

Can someone explain to me the term "film noise"? Never came across it before, but then, I am a layman. Some sort of film school terminology?

isn't it just a fancy pants term for film grain?

 

[king666]

There are plenty of colors in Snyder's DCEU

Yeah. His movies look great. BvS looked really good.

 

[idiot09]

There's gotta be film grain when you shoot on 35mm film. Otherwise what's even the point.

 

[matt47]

I'm one of the few that doesn't get why people like film grain. It's like wanting your film's quality to look bad.

 

[Polux]

I can only speak for myself, but I particularly like the grain (sometimes) because ti gives the picture "texture", the illusion of tangibility, like seeing the little clumps of paint in a, well, painting.

Which doesn't necessarily work for every movie, of course, but in this particular case it REALLY works for some of us.

 

[Greenlite]

If film grain means the texture you see shooting in film, and results in visuals like SW7, Nolan films, BvS, WW, then I am all for it.

I don't like the perfect clean textures, it's like TV.

Like Picasso paints s*** and it's beautiful, it's art, kids photoshopping fan-arts are mostly considered...amateur, but of course you get some gems every now n then

 

[idiot09]

I was looking for Dunkirk tv spots, and noticed the IT and Justice League trailed side by side. And I noticed they came out around the same time, and they both have 29M views. Yet it is quite widely known that the IT trailer was some kind of sensation....hmm strange.

 

[Greenlite]

I was looking for Dunkirk tv spots, and noticed the IT and Justice League trailed side by side. And I noticed they came out around the same time, and they both have 29M views. Yet it is quite widely known that the IT trailer was some kind of sensation....hmm strange.

I guess it's not just YT views, IT prob had a bunch of FB/twitter shares etc

 

[matt47]

If film grain means the texture you see shooting in film, and results in visuals like SW7, Nolan films, BvS, WW, then I am all for it.

I don't like the perfect clean textures, it's like TV.

Like Picasso paints s*** and it's beautiful, it's art, kids photoshopping fan-arts are mostly considered...amateur, but of course you get some gems every now n then

The thing is though, it looks artificial in some shots of Snyder's movies.

 

[idiot09]

I guess it's not just YT views, IT prob had a bunch of FB/twitter shares etc

Thats BS tho, because we all know how stupid view count on fb is. TBF its very easy to inflate those numbers to suit a narrative. Anyway...

JL trailer 21 days away folks.

 

[matt47]

Thats BS tho, because we all know how stupid view count on fb is. TBF its very easy to inflate those numbers to suit a narrative. Anyway...

JL trailer 21 days away folks.

 

[Superchan]

There are plenty of colors in Snyder's DCEU movies.

I disagree, with some specific exceptions MOS was very muted and BvS was very dark and neither styles were what I would associate with superman but to each his own.

 

[KRYPTON INC.]

Thats BS tho, because we all know how stupid view count on fb is. TBF its very easy to inflate those numbers to suit a narrative. Anyway...

JL trailer 21 days away folks.

External reaction.

Internal reaction.

 

[Micromind]

If film grain means the texture you see shooting in film, and results in visuals like SW7, Nolan films, BvS, WW, then I am all for it.

I don't like the perfect clean textures, it's like TV.

Like Picasso paints s*** and it's beautiful, it's art, kids photoshopping fan-arts are mostly considered...amateur, but of course you get some gems every now n then

This.

Clean and smooth texture usually means that the movie was filmed on a digital camera, which is great for TV and sports coverage but looks too polished for movies.

 

[matt47]

This.

Clean and smooth texture usually means that the movie was filmed on a digital camera, which is great for TV and sports coverage but looks too polished for movies.

I have to disagree here. These days the difference between film and digital are basically non existent. It really all depends on what the film maker does in post. You can make a digital movie look like it was shot on film and vise versa.

I agree that I don't like that clean/smooth texture you guys are talking about, but I don't think that has to do with film vs digital. I think that all depends on the calibration on your tv. All tv's now come with that motion smoother setting and it's what you see on in stores...and sometimes (unfortunately) in some people's homes. I went to a friends place and he had it on and thought it made the movies look better....I literally could not watch it, it was too smooth! It looked like a soap opera...or you know...The Hobbit.

 

[GothamBat]

I have to disagree here. These days the difference between film and digital are basically non existent. It really all depends on what the film maker does in post. You can make a digital movie look like it was shot on film and vise versa.

I agree that I don't like that clean/smooth texture you guys are talking about, but I don't think that has to do with film vs digital. I think that all depends on the calibration on your tv. All tv's now come with that motion smoother setting and it's what you see on in stores...and sometimes (unfortunately) in some people's homes. I went to a friends place and he had it on and thought it made the movies look better....I literally could not watch it, it was too smooth! It looked like a soap opera...or you know...The Hobbit.

that was because of the frame rate though. more frames = closer to looking like real life = more soap-opera-y and cheap looking

 

[markjoedelonge]

I'm on Season 7 of Parks and Rec!

21 days to go!!