Ok without going into politics I'll sum it up like this; Che Guevara had done a lot of good. He traveled throughout South America and was radicalized by the poverty, hunger, and disease he witnessed. Fulgencio Batista was pretty bad at the time and change was needed and Che and Fidel the rest removed him from power. A lot of people were happy about that.
I've no strong opinion on the man, but he was seen as a freedom revolutionist with good intentions. I believe that's why there's enough support to put him on t-shirts in Cuba and so forth.
At best there's a dividing opinion on him. But that's because there's arguments for good things he did for many people, like some of the ones I mentioned. Not to mention his history is often rewritten and revised.
Who could say the same for the Joker?
Sorry that was a bit longer than I intended it to be, but I just wanted to be clear on why there's a world of difference between these two men.
Thank you. That's all I'm saying.
I don't know what comics or movies you're referring to, but in BTAS he did not have his own casino. A millionaire built a casino in his image (and claimed it was built in honor of the classic Joker image associated with cards and games) so Joker would destroy it and he would collect on the insurance. Painting pictures for Gotham's wealthy....are you talking about the 60's TV show there? Because that is about the only show where they could get away with something as cartoony as that and have it feel normal for that campy world.
As for Bruce Wayne interacting with him, he's Batman. He's not afraid of him.