The Official Choose A Director Thread

[FlawlessVictory]

You know something about WB looking at Lawrence for Superman don't you.

 

[JackMercy]

Am I incorrect in my assertion, Show...? Just stating the facts...

 

[Excel]

What do you mean "would not be able to get"? Warners has a very good working relationship with F. Lawrence... He has done two pretty successful pictures for the studio...

I think that, if what show says bout wb keeping director on short leash true, hell be tough to get.

 

[Angeloz]

You do realise they sign actors up for trilogies in comic book films?

Angeloz

 

[Angeloz]

Accidental double post due to computer.

Angeloz

 

[Sam]

You do realise they sign actors up for trilogies in comic book films?

Angeloz

Tells that to Kate and rest of crew of SR. Most of rumors says they are all out, exept, MAYBE, Routh

 

[Angeloz]

For the last time people it is Lois. Lois Lane not Louis Superman is not gay he is not Apollo from Wildstorm

But he and Batman make a good couple.

Actually I understand about the lack of being able to spell Lois frustration. You should joke instead. It's more fun.

Angeloz

 

[Showtime]

Am I incorrect in my assertion, Show...? Just stating the facts...

Nope you are right on.

Lawrence and WB are surely on the same page and definitely have a good working relationship.

 

[Angeloz]

Tells that to Kate and rest of crew of SR. Most of rumors says they are all out, exept, MAYBE, Routh

My point was that's why there's rumours of trilogies as that's de rigueur (standard practice). Even if they don't get made.

Angeloz

 

[JackMercy]

Nope you are right on.

Lawrence and WB are surely on the same page and definitely have a good working relationship.

I know that. Please tell excel, so I don't have to...

 

[Showtime]

I think that, if what show says bout wb keeping director on short leash true, hell be tough to get.

WB would not be able to get Lawrence. Show is saying they wanna keep the directors on a short leash.

Lawrence wouldn't be a director that WB couldn't keep on a leash so to speak. He has a good relationship with them working and otherwise. Wouldn't be a problem.

You know something about WB looking at Lawrence for Superman don't you.

:gag:

 

[SuperDaniel]

What if the W Bros are the action directors Mark Millar was talking about the whole time?

 

[Showtime]

I know that. Please tell excel, so I don't have to...

Taken care of. See above.

 

[Showtime]

What if the W Bros are the action directors Mark Millar was talking about the whole time?

Interesting point but he always said "director" and "he".

 

[Sam]

My point was that's why there's rumours of trilogies as that's de rigueur (standard practice). Even if they don't get made.

And my point is, develop a trilogy is way different than make 3 movies.

Spider-man isnt a trilogy. X-men isnt a trilogy. Those are 3 different movies, done once at a time.

What they are talking about is a trilogy.

 

[SuperDaniel]

Interesting point but he always said "director" and "he".

Maybe its because he didn't want us to find out. They have a huge pull at the WB and are big action directors. If Millar said directors, we would certainly know who they are, right?

It sounds like the W Bros would direct, Millar would write and Routh will be Superman maybe by WB's request.

 

[Daredevil_2003]

But he and Batman make a good couple.

Actually I understand about the lack of being able to spell Lois frustration. You should joke instead. It's more fun.

Angeloz

Yes, making fun of people with bad spelling/grammar is always more fun than just throwing a fit. t:

 

[Excel]

Lawrence wouldn't be a director that WB couldn't keep on a leash so to speak.

I doubt that, most directors want total control, espec. ones fresh off a 600 million hit.

 

[Showtime]

Maybe its because he didn't want us to find out. They have a huge pull at the WB and are big action directors. If Millar said directors, we would certainly know who they are, right?

It sounds like the W Bros would direct, Millar would write and Routh will be Superman maybe by WB's request.

I really don't think that is the case, but it is certainly a good theory.

 

[Showtime]

I doubt that, most directors want total control, espec. ones fresh off a 600 million hit.

If he keeps the budget where it should be and goes with the story they want, then they would have happy with the outcome. Those are two of the sticking points ie the leash.

 

[Excel]

I would bet it is a lot more than that. No way they have a grey backround retro look. Theyll want light bright and modern ala spidey and iron man.

 

[Showtime]

What?

 

[Angeloz]

And my point is, develop a trilogy is way different than make 3 movies.

Spider-man isnt a trilogy. X-men isnt a trilogy. Those are 3 different movies, done once at a time.

What they are talking about is a trilogy.

Comic book films get made one film at a time. Plus one film leads to the next (kind of although sometimes badly). The only exception is "Superman: The Movie" and "Superman II" as they made them at the same time although they changed things so one didn't lead as directly to the next.

Angeloz

 

[Daredevil_2003]

I would bet it is a lot more than that. No way they have a grey backround retro look. Theyll want light bright and modern ala spidey and iron man.

lol wut?

 

[I Am The Knight]

...