Yeah but bringing Venom into Spider-Man 3 didn't balls up anything from the previous two movies. Peter dropping MJ for Black Cat after the ending to Spider-Man 3 makes no sense.
Probably one of the reasons it was cancelled. Raimi hated the scripts and he wanted to have a good script written, but that meant delaying the movie AGAIN. Sony wouldn't have it so they rebooted the franchise (bad idea).
That's the one thing that makes me glad Spider-Man 4 was scrapped.Yeah but bringing Venom into Spider-Man 3 didn't balls up anything from the previous two movies. Peter dropping MJ for Black Cat after the ending to Spider-Man 3 makes no sense.
Yeah it sucks that Raimi didn't get the chance to do another Spidey film, however Im pretty happy that the first 2 films will be remembered, they're clasics and nothing can take that away from them. In a way there are levels in which these films won't be topped, the new Spider-Man will be conected to the MCU which is great but its success will have a lot to do with interacting with other characters which is necessary after the last 2 disasters. So in that sense Raimi's trilogy will be the best standalone Spiderman franchise while hopefully the new Spidey is as great in its shared universe.
That's why Sony is in the mess it's in now. Moral of the story? Don't mess with the director if they've proven themselves. Just let them do their own thing.
It's common sense these so called professionals should have known themselves. Spider-Man 2 was the most acclaimed CBM until TDK came along. Sony should have had total faith in Raimi after that.
It's common sense these so called professionals should have known themselves. Spider-Man 2 was the most acclaimed CBM until TDK came along. Sony should have had total faith in Raimi after that.
If Sony wasn't so stupid then maybe Raimi's third Spider-Man film would have topped SM2, and the series could have continued long after that.
They should of had total faith in him after Spider-Man 3 as well, or rather they should have just GIVEN him their faith. I mean, critical fan reception aside, Spider-Man 3 made quite a bit of money. Spider-Man 3 and the not-to-be Spider-Man 4 are prime examples that higher up executives don't know ****, and should always **** and stay out of the way and let a director do his damn job.
I think without the dancing scenes and Venom's little amount of screentime, the fans wouldn't hate it so much 'cause even with those aspects most of the general audience loves it.
So discussion of organics and mechanical has been brought back to life in the 2017 thread, and it got me thinking as it always does.
For any of the posters here who were much younger when the first movie came out, did you notice the change? Did you question it and wonder why it was such? Me, it totally went over my head in 2002, and that was a big year for me. I was drowing myself in Spider-Man media anyway I could. I was already a fan long before the movie came along, so naturally all I would have known was mechanical shooters. The old Fox cartoon and the 1978 show specifically was what I was drawn to during those days, and some Ultimate Spider-Man comics too, as well as a bunch of toys. But when the movie came out, organic webbing went completely over my head, I just recognized he had webbing and didn't give it a second though. This even continued onwards to Spider-Man 2 and 3. It just never dawned on me till the first Amazing Spider-Man movie when mechanicals came back into the picture. By that time, for some reason...I just didn't care form them anymore. At first I thought I was just in a "either or" category. But the more I thought about it and rewatched the Raimi movies I just ended up preferring them exclusively. Anyway, back to the original question, when you were younger during the time of the Raimi triology, did the difference occur to you?
In a recent interview Joss Whedon said he liked Spider-man 3!
I'd also include the retcon of Uncle Ben's death involving Sandman as being one of the more unpopular elements.
In a recent interview Joss Whedon said he liked Spider-man 3!
Me too. And I preferred organics for a number of years until I got used to the mechanical webshooters in the comics and every other animated show.As a kid I always thought Spider-Man could actually shoot webs so when I started watching the 90s show I was like "WTF" lol So I've always prefered the organic webs.
I think web shooters are fine as long as they are adressed in their story instead of being just cheap fan service.