ShadowBoxing
Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2004
- Messages
- 30,620
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
Not really a plothole, but more of a grievance. Stephens really should've been called Bullock, since he basically had the look and character.
My only plot hole?
The fact that fincher doesnt spit out the smoke grenade in the prologue.
Stupid.
Also, can someone explain to me why people are on the barges? I don't think it's a plot hole. I just keep peeing at that point in the movie every time I see it. It's weird. What happened?
To be fair, the smoke grenade is pretty big nd it is stuffed right into his mouth by the Joker, and if something is that big and stuffed into your mouth there is diffilculty trying to spit it out.
How Gordon was able to get to the place where Two-Face captured his family earlier than Batman?
Not really a plothole, but more of a grievance. Stephens really should've been called Bullock, since he basically had the look and character.
I just assumed that the devoted man-power were too busy looking for bombs on the bridges and tunnels...since the Joker's threat mentioned nothing about the ferries...although it does require a small suspension of disbelief that they would not check the ferries for explosives before loading the passengers.
Where did the piles and piles of mob money come from? I know the Joker had Lau--are we just to assume that the Joker forced Lau to send the mob's money back from HK?
WOW, gonna leave that one alone.....![]()
Well, Ramerez is an actual Jeph Loeb character, whereas Bullock is totally left out, so I find it funny they didn't bother to name drop with such a small role...and he survives to boot.There's really no reason we couldn't have seen at least Bullock in this movie given the roles that were involved. Even Montoya could have been fit in easily.
you can easily make the deduction where it came from.
Can someone explain to me why people are on the barges? I don't think it's a plot hole. I just keep peeing at that point in the movie every time I see it. It's weird. What happened?
I think the movie hints that Lau just packed it up and had it moved somewhere in Gotham while he went to Hong Kong.
I don't know if this is a plot hole per se, but if Two Face is dead at the end - doesn't this mean Batman killed him?
No. Dent was holding Jimmy Gordon, and Batman tackled Dent. All three of them fell over the edge. Batman saved Jimmy, but Dent fell (presumably to his death).
Batman didn't kill Dent intentionally, nor did he decline to save him like with Ra's in BB.
Dent put himself in that situation like Ra's did and Batman interjected for the greater good.So you're saying tackling someone holding a hostage whose standing on the edge of a 60ft drop, when you know you'll only be able to save the hostage and when tackling them will result in a fall isn't killing them? Riiiiiigggghhhht.
So you're saying tackling someone holding a hostage whose standing on the edge of a 60ft drop, when you know you'll only be able to save the hostage and when tackling them will result in a fall isn't killing them? Riiiiiigggghhhht.
What would you have had Batman to do then. I will pass this on to Nolan so he can correct his mistake. And Batman did sort of cause Ra's death by allowing Gordon to take his tumbler and blow up the tracks.There's a big, big difference between not saving someone (Ra's) and doing something that directly results in a death (Harvey). Which is what Batman would have done if Harvey turns out to be dead, as his tackling/pushing directly resulted Harvey's death. That is unarguable. And as this would completely contradict the major themes and arguments of the film, I take this to mean that Harvey is still alive.
What would you have had Batman to do then. I will pass this on to Nolan so he can correct his mistake. And Batman did sort of cause Ra's death by allowing Gordon to take his tumbler and blow up the tracks.