The Official 'Thor Rate & Review' thread - Part 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
Having read Devin's review, I think he's pretty much on the money except for the Thor/Jane Foster romance.

It's one of those romances where the characters are smitten the moment they lay eyes on each other. And Jane does have an interesting in Thor...as a test subject...as the validation of her entire career. But, he is right in the sense that Portman and Hemsworth's chemistry do make up for a lot of the scripts problems in that area.

And I especially think this is spot on for the Marvel films as of late: "I’m afraid that the lesson Marvel learned from Iron Man is that a charismatic lead with make up for any number of flaws, and that’s only true to an extent. But as great as Hemsworth and Hiddleston are, they cannot overcome the film’s flaws. All they can do is drag the film up from awful to fairly tolerable."

Sorry, but it's dead on right there.
 
i have to disagree with that review sorry. The movie is simple comic book fun. Some film buffs want every single thing build up and explanied a 100 times over. It's fantasy. I totally buy the romance.
 
Last edited:
Having read Devin's review, I think he's pretty much on the money except for the Thor/Jane Foster romance.

It's one of those romances where the characters are smitten the moment they lay eyes on each other. And Jane does have an interesting in Thor...as a test subject...as the validation of her entire career. But, he is right in the sense that Portman and Hemsworth's chemistry do make up for a lot of the scripts problems in that area.

And I especially think this is spot on for the Marvel films as of late: "I’m afraid that the lesson Marvel learned from Iron Man is that a charismatic lead with make up for any number of flaws, and that’s only true to an extent. But as great as Hemsworth and Hiddleston are, they cannot overcome the film’s flaws. All they can do is drag the film up from awful to fairly tolerable."

Sorry, but it's dead on right there.


Well, not quite but he's on the right track IMO. I'd call it more than 'fairly tolerable'. Watchmen was a film I might describe that way, i.e. I was no worse for wear having seen it. That's what I consider fairly tolerable. Thor was fun and worth seeing again.
 
Devin is a raging DC fanboy really though. I expected him to give Thor a negative review. And i expect him to praise Green Lantern as a masterpiece. The "fairely tolerable" remark is nonsense. It reeks of pretentious and bias twaddle, in all honesty.

Anyway, saw it last night. Really enjoyed it. Hemsworth, Hiddleston and Elba are the standouts.

I also thought Hopkins was great. He seemed really sincere in his performance, and i was expecting him to just ham it up and phone it in. The scene where he banishes Thor is a masterclass in acting. You could really sense both the ferocious anger and the heartbreaking pain that Odin felt there.

Hemsworth really nailed down the likable obnoxiousness/arrogance. And also the childish naivety. Because really, that's what Thor was before he learned humility; a spoilt, man child. And he was convincing with his child like naivety. He seems to have a natural comedic flair, too.

Hiddleston was amazing. I really felt for Loki's plight. The scene where he and Odin are arguing in the vault was so well acted. Again, like with Hopkins' in the scene where Thor was banished, you could really sense the anger yet at the same time the pain in the character. Loki is now my favourite comic book movie villain. There is a fine line between making a villain sympathetic... and going completely over the top and mushy with it (Sam Raimi i'm looking at you!)

Elba as Heimdall was bad ass. Period. So much presence and subtle power in his performance. I loved his commanding, monotone voice. You could really sense that even Thor knows Heimdall isn't one to be ****ing with.

Everyone else was decent. I really liked Selvig. The scene with him and Thor in the bar... competing to down those big jugs of beer was brilliant. He was actually a pretty well defined character, whereas I expected him just to be generic.

Portman as Jane was surprisingly not that annoying. I liked how she played her as intelligent, but still kinda ditzy and scatty. And I genuinely believed she really liked Thor (i imagine a lot of that wasn't even acting, to be honest). Although her line "Oh.my.God" was pretty cringe worthy.

The Warriors Three were pretty corny, but I guess that was the intention. I thought Stevenson as Vosltagg was brilliant though.

The story was solid. I thought they did well with Thor's journey in the 2 hours running time. But for me, Loki's story running parallel was much more interesting though IMO. The conflict between the two brothers, the whole love/hate thing was very well played. Highlighted in the end when despite Thor realizing his brother had betrayed him and Asgard... he still showed pain and anguish when Loki apparently fell to his doom.

SHIELD played an important role, they actually seemed more welcome in this movie. The idea of a secret government agency investigating all these strange goings on makes sense. Fits with the plot. Although the Hawkeye cameo was pretty pointless. He should have taken Thor out with a tranq arrow or something, make his appearance actually worthwhile.

The action scenes, hmm, I was kinda disappointed to be honest. The first scene in Jotumheim was great. But I felt the Destroyer battle was anti climatic and Thor beat it far too easily. The Destroyer in the comics is nigh on invulnerable. The finale was very emotionally charged, but the actual fight between Loki and Thor was a bit of a let down.

Overall i'd give it a solid 8/10. Not as good as Iron Man, but definitely the second best movie Marvel Studios has made.
 
Last edited:
At least he didn't [Blackout]actually destroy the Destroyer but rather simply got it to shut down. Given that I know that the Destroyer is indestructable, it would've sucked to see Thor smash it to pieces.[/Blackout]
 
I'm gonna have to see Thor for myself to see how good his fight with Loki really was, because there doesn't really seem to be a clear consensus on it.

I've seen alot of users say it was awesome and I've seen quite a bit of users say it was a let down.
 
Devin's hardly a DC fanboy.

Wait until his review of Captain America hits. It's already a huge win in his eyes...

That review was written the moment we saw Evans in full gear. He's all over Captain America...as he was when Iron Man came out.
 
True.

But i'd have just liked to have seen a longer, more drawn out battle with the Destroyer. Show some of Thor's raw phsyical strength, going toe to toe with it, trading blows. Then perhaps when he's getting beaten, take to the sky and start using Mjolnir's more exotic powers.
 
kedrell,

I would agree with you that it's more than fairly tolerable but it doesn't really strive to be more than that.

But, I really can't give an honest assessment of Thor until I see those deleted scenes and see what Branagh might have kept in because I've got to assume that Marvel wanted this film to play swift...and I think there's some character connective tissue that's on the cutting room floor that I think would levitate the issues that both Devin and I have.

But, I will own it on Blu Ray for two reasons. One, I collect all of Portman's work. Two, it'll make a hell of a double billing with Masters of the Universe(I freaking love that film.).
 
Yeah I'm looking forward to those scenes as well. One thing that really wasn't in the film and that I would have liked(though there is a passing line by Thor that sort of covers that base) was [Blackout]to see that Asgardians are far stronger and tougher than human beings. Sure we get a tiny fraction of that but really I was just hoping one of the warriors 3 or Sif would've just picked up a car or something to try to smash the Destroyer with...or something really clear to that effect.[/Blackout]
 
At least he didn't [Blackout]actually destroy the Destroyer but rather simply got it to shut down. Given that I know that the Destroyer is indestructable, it would've sucked to see Thor smash it to pieces.[/Blackout]

Uhm... didn't Thor [BLACKOUT]turn the Destroyer's head to mush[/BLACKOUT]?
 
Not that I saw. He just got it to shut down. It's still all in one piece. I'll see it again and try to make sure that's the case though.
 
Yeah I'm looking forward to those scenes as well. One thing that really wasn't in the film and that I would have liked(though there is a passing line by Thor that sort of covers that base) was [Blackout]to see that Asgardians are far stronger and tougher than human beings. Sure we get a tiny fraction of that but really I was just hoping one of the warriors 3 or Sif would've just picked up a car or something to try to smash the Destroyer with...or something really clear to that effect.[/Blackout]

True, although I'm not suprised that they aren't in the film, I kind of knew that was going to be left out from the get go.
 
8/10

Thoroughly enjoyed the [blackout]altercation and proceeding fight amongst the frost giants, Loki's deception and Thor's banishment.[/blackout]. Pacing was good, never looked at my watch or thought something was dragging, the comedy elements had me most worried but when seeing it all as a whole they mostly fit well. [blackout]The relationship between Thor and Jane was underdeveloped, and left the emotional ending moment of Thor asking Heimdell if he can see Jane quite empty, but something was bound to be underdeveloped here when so much fantasy backstory has to be explained to the audience. Loved Hawkeye's cameo, loved every mention and allusion to the other Marvel heroes.[/blackout] Hemsworth was definitely the right pick for Thor, he and Hiddleston were both very strong in their roles. Branagh's direction was expectedly strong. Overall, it wasn't the best Marvel film - but it's a strong opening to the universe of Thor, and one that I think can only improve in a sequel where so much backstory will already have been established.
 
How would you rank it among the other Marvel Studios films?
 
I saw it. It was everything I dreamed of and more.

It easily smashes the over-rated, campy, over acted Spiderman trilogy. And a much better movie than the forced humor filled Iron Man films. Only the Hulk is on a level playing field with Thor, but I still feel Thor is the best thus far.
 
Btw, anyone else regret having watched 300 by now? Because every time someone said "This is madness!" I wanted to yell "This is Sparta!"
 
devin is definitely not a DC fan boy and his spidey reviews scored much higher than BB and TDK.

I'll go further to say why I think his review is wrong (imho);

1. you can clearly see everyone's motivation.
from Loki, to Thor to Odin. you don't need to knock people over the head with it it was clearly defined.
I would agree the change in personality (Thor in particular) is a too to quick and convenient but I totally got the journey to get there (metaphorically speaking).

2. The Shield sections service the story.
in IM2, the Shield sections feel bolted on and fell a little out of place but in this movie there is a REASON shield is there, there is a REASON they are holding Thor.

3. The sections on Earth whilst boring (c'mon, they are) also service the story and is a NEEDED backdrop to the splendour of Asgard, the movie needs to take a breathe and the Earth sections allows this.

4. The CG isn't as make as he makes out, at least they didn't bother me as much as say G.I. JOE.
 
Last edited:
Btw, anyone else regret having watched 300 by now? Because every time someone said "This is madness!" I wanted to yell "This is Sparta!"

I almost laughed out loud when I heard that line in Thor... lol.

And it could be "This is [anything]" I will think of 300 :csad:
 
Would be fun if it turns out that Hiddleston was yelling "This is Sparta!" as a gag. Would make an awesome blooper reel. :funny:
 
That Devin review was so ridiculously flawed. 'Shield sinks the film'? So he's so lazy he's just copying his criticisms of Iron Man 2 onto Thor? He proposes so many subjectives without ANY evidence, just 'Asgard looks so cheesy and silly, the script is awful, Anthony Hopkins collects his paycheck'. I hate that the internet allows people like that to qualify as journalists.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"