I don't see why it's idiocy. I still don't understand why people get so upset when someone claims that the man died for his art. I mean it's not like it's anything to be ashamed of. And he could have said whatever he wanted about how fun the role was. His definition of "fun" could have simply been the escape factor as far as being able to completely transform into something else. As talented as the man was, and as brilliant as his performance was, the role obviously had a toll on him, as was evident by the amount of medication he was on. I mean he also stated that he was only getting 2 hrs. of sleep some nights during filming. That ain't exactly my definition of fun. You can't simply turn off the character. I'm sorry but the role of the Joker, i.e. all the deep, ark places he had to go to in his mind in order to be able to pull off the performance he did, MIGHT have had an affect on the mans health. In fact, I think it did a good chunk of damage. I suffer from some of the same things he did. One of the thing nobody seems to think about in terms of this arguement about if the role killed him is the ticks. All that lip licking and twitching, I don't think he was faking those. And I think it's fair to attribute things like that, that might have led to excess medication, to his end status.