My goal is not so much to change your opinion, but to subvert the narrative of you put forth, and show it to be ill founded, for the benefit of others. You're certainly welcome to your opinion, but to say that it is founded on all the information given so far, that's not opinion, anymore than whether the moon is made of cheese is a matter of opinion.
Certainly you've read a lot of information, but if you've put a negative spin on nearly all of that information, your conclusion is based on your opinion, and not actually on the information, no matter how much it is.
Take the previous page, since you asked me to re-read, you compared a quote about kinberg giving the nature of FF during a XMDoFP comic-con panel to Kinberg talking about the visual scale of XMA during an XMA interview. You used the amount of information you have to make a comparison between statements that are not actually comparable. That's your opinion, that those statements are comparable, but you portray your opinion as though it is a function of information, when it is not. You use this to then portray a coming of age story as something boring, ignoring information such as all the actually comparable films to this enterprise and some of the greatest films in history. And then calling the conclusion of 'boring' as 'going by what he actually said.' It seems you do this over and over and then portray this selective use of information as an opinion formed by a large amount of information.
You're welcome to your opinion, but when you portray it as anything other than that, ie formed from a large number of facts, I feel compelled to point it out. Some people have not read as many quotes as you have, and unless your bias is pointed out, they may be led to believe that you are making the most reasonable conclusion based on all the information presented, which, again, is what you're implying when you say a positive spin is a lie.