The Spider-Man 3 FAQ Thread

I thought Americans believed in democracy and free speech and all that.

I take it there was reaction to the removal of the thread, and that it too got "removed".
 
drmick said:
I thought Americans believed in democracy and free speech and all that.

What the heck does freedom of speech have to do with Venom sketches? :huh: :cwink:
 
Are you serious with that question?

You know what I meant: freedom of speech referred to the right to discuss the Venom sketches here; democracy referred to the right of the SHH people to have say in what their leaders (the mods) can or cannot do.
 
drmick said:
Are you serious with that question?

You know what I meant: freedom of speech referred to the right to discuss the Venom sketches here; democracy referred to the right of the SHH people to have say in what their leaders (the mods) can or cannot do.

I don't know if the Hype is a democracy, so again, take it up with them if it's just bothering you oh so much. Fact is: they don't want people discussing or posting the sketches, and that's the end of it.
 
It seems so unbelievable that people can't accept simple instructions. Instead they make it seem like their in charge.
 
NewYorkSpider said:
It seems so unbelievable that people can't accept simple instructions. Instead they make it seem like their in charge.

It seems so unbelievable that people do not know the difference between "their" and "they're", but there you go.

When the Q&A threads got removed there was a more elaborate reason given (and it was stickied if I remember correctly).

And in the end, all I have asked is: Was there are a reaction to the removal of said thread which, too, was subsequently removed.

Yes? No? Don't know? Simple question.
 
Was it said in a removed script summary that Spider-Man fought the Symbiote after it left Brock?
 
No, rather then merge to become Venom, they sat down for tea and crumpets.
 
drmick said:
It seems so unbelievable that people do not know the difference between "their" and "they're", but there you go.

When the Q&A threads got removed there was a more elaborate reason given (and it was stickied if I remember correctly).

And in the end, all I have asked is: Was there are a reaction to the removal of said thread which, too, was subsequently removed.

Yes? No? Don't know? Simple question.
You are correct. And a MOD later admitted he was a bit harsh for the banning of even talking about the Q&A...we use to not even be able to mention it...he later apologized.
 
chaseter said:
You are correct. And a MOD later admitted he was a bit harsh for the banning of even talking about the Q&A...we use to not even be able to mention it...he later apologized.

Power to the people! And all that!

Erm......(please don't ban me).
 
shh didnt want us to go into spiderman 3 knowing the whole movie. thats why he didnt want us tlkin about the q and a. sony proly had a hand in it 2.
 
How do I write Gwen's last name right? Stacy or Stacey???
Please help :)
 
And you are a n00b who will most likely get banned or a probation if you say that to their faces.
 
So what's the deal with the good quality comic con footage being up now? Why didn't it not end up on the net sooner?
 
It's not the comic-con trailer. It is a longer and completely unfinished theatrical trailer that was leaked by god knows who.
 
StarkCEO said:
They moderators are up tight anyway.


Perhaps it has something to do about lawsuits and being sued?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,346
Messages
22,088,991
Members
45,887
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"