Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]387055[/split]
The Nokia trailer debuted online, and therefore did not require a MPAA rating.
If the Nokia trailer is going to be attached with Spider-Man, then it would have to be rated by the MPAA in order for it to play in theaters.
What I do find interesting is that the Nokia trailer is 2:16, whereas this trailer #4 clocks in at 2:31. That's an addition of 15 seconds, which sounds unusually long if they were simply taking the trailer and adding the MPAA certificate to it.
Whoops. Thanks for the correction.It's not 2:31, it's 2:13. And there is some static black at the beginning of the Nokia trailer, so I suspect it's that one.
1- Why does the film rating site have TDKR trailer 4 on the list? That's the Nokia trailer right?
http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=23645105&postcount=821Hey guys, can someone explain 2 things
1- Why does the film rating site have TDKR trailer 4 on the list? That's the Nokia trailer right?
He said it was that and that we post non-Batman stuff.
I guess its a good thing I wasnt on the Lounge thenbut heck. Back to Batman?
Broker: Um, she didn't specify that she chose Harvey though, did she? "I don't have an answer" comes to mind. But in general, yeah I guess she did.
I'm trying not to listen to the samples ... the trailers themselves are giving me goosebumps every morning.
Are these new/real?
Some stuff going on in this film that I'm glad I know nothing about (and I want to keep it that way):
1. What is wrong with Bruce, i.e. his injury / sickness.
2. Liam Neeson's cameo(s).
3. The Scarecrow and what he's up to.
4. Why Bane has his mask.
5. The ending.
Jonny you sure you didn't post more AJ and thongs again?